The Android invasion continues with LG's Optimus

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
I like you you twist my words to say the phone fail because of its looks.

I like how you say here that you're not talking about looks, and then you end your stupid rant with this:

And I don't know what planet you're living in but aesthetic plays a big part in a consumer choice for a product.


Oh, and your original post in this thread was


Thats great, I'm pretty sure LG loves comsumers like you.
Thats why when HTC released smartphones with the Snapdragon proccessors for T-mobile(HD2), Verizon(Incredible), and Sprint(EVO), they all sold out.
And LG release its Snapdragon for ATT, the Expo, that phone sunk into oblivion.
Probably has nothing to do the other 3 being nice looking phones with big LCD screen vs. the LG which was ugly and has a 3.2" screen.
Keep telling yourself that "design is almost totally irrelevant"


The only conclusion one can take away from your incoherent rants is that you're an idiot. You're a great troll, though. I mean, you ruined this thread.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I don't think the "Chic" one will appeal to fashionistas, or has sleek curves as LG thinks it does, but it's also not a bad looking phone in comparison to say the Droid, which is selling fine.
lg-optimus-smartphones.jpg

The phone on the bottom sort of looks like the Droid X
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Thats great, I'm pretty sure LG loves comsumers like you.
Thats why when HTC released smartphones with the Snapdragon proccessors for T-mobile(HD2), Verizon(Incredible), and Sprint(EVO), they all sold out.
And LG release its Snapdragon for ATT, the Expo, that phone sunk into oblivion.
Probably has nothing to do the other 3 being nice looking phones with big LCD screen vs. the LG which was ugly and has a 3.2" screen.
Keep telling yourself that "design is almost totally irrelevant"

Let's break down what you said about this list of phones.

+ The all share Snapdragon processors.
+ HD2 = T-Mobile, Sense-UI, Larger 4.3" Screen
+ Incredible = Verizon, Android, Large 3.7" Screen
+ EVO = Sprint, Android, Larger 4.3" Screen, WiMax

Now let's look at the LG Expo:
- AT&T
- 3.2" Screen
- Vanilla WinMo 6.5 unskinned (and probably locked down to hell and back)

These differences as well AT&T's flagship phone is the iPhone, given the options I'm sure you can understand why the HD2, Incredible and EVO - all being non-AT&T phones sold out while the Expo didn't. You may consider the screen size being an aesthetic issue, but in reality it's a technical issue.

Other than that, all three of the other phones are technically superior than the Expo in almost every other way, including the carrier choice. It has nothing to do with HTC versus LG in terms of aesthetic design.
 
Last edited:

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Don't forget that Samsung and LG are the two companies making AMOLED screens. So their phones will get first dibs on AMOLED supply with everyone else picking up the scraps. So if you want an AMOLED screen, your options could become fairly limited.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Let's break down what you said about this list of phones.

+ The all share Snapdragon processors.
+ HD2 = T-Mobile, Sense-UI, Larger 4.3" Screen
+ Incredible = Verizon, Android, Large 3.7" Screen
+ EVO = Sprint, Android, Larger 4.3" Screen, WiMax

Now let's look at the LG Expo:
- AT&T
- 3.2" Screen
- Vanilla WinMo 6.5 unskinned (and probably locked down to hell and back)

These differences as well AT&T's flagship phone is the iPhone, given the options I'm sure you can understand why the HD2, Incredible and EVO - all being non-AT&T phones sold out while the Expo didn't. You may consider the screen size being an aesthetic issue, but in reality it's a technical issue.

Other than that, all three of the other phones are technically superior than the Expo in almost every other way, including the carrier choice. It has nothing to do with HTC versus LG in terms of aesthetic design.

I'm not sure I follow you. Are you saying the Expo was destined to fail? Are you excusing them?
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
So if you want an AMOLED screen, your options could become fairly limited.

Through 2010 and 2011 anyway. LG and Samsung both have major fabs that come online in late 2011. Not sure if any smaller players will pop up before then though. I would like to see more Super AMOLED screens out there.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
I'm not sure I follow you. Are you saying the Expo was destined to fail? Are you excusing them?
Pretty much. Given the sub-par specs and the fact that AT&T is going to push the iPhone while they still can, the Expo may as well have been stillborn. It has nothing to do with aesthetic, just look at the marketing. Have you seen an AT&T ad for any phone other than an iPhone in the last year? Now what about VZW, Sprint and T-Mo? Hmm... pretty sure I see Android ads almost daily for VZW and T-Mo.