The All Time Final Statement on Clinton's Presidency

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

AaronP

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
4,359
0
0
Anyone who says he was a good president after reading this should be exported to Kabul.

This has nothing to do with Monica, nothing to do with famly values, nothing to do with perjury. This is the final statement on his presidency. he should stay in Australia.

YOU WILL BE SHOCKED

and don't turn around and say that Reagon armed the whackos too, because they were fighting communism.
 
A

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
It doesn't surprise me that the bush administration will try to abuse this catastrophy to win votes.

Aelus
 
R

Rockhound

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
408
0
0
Ok all you Clinton lovers and Bush haters!!!! DEFEND THIS ONE and tell me WHO SCREWED the F**K UP!!! I FREAKING DARE YOU TO TELL ME BUSH IS A SCREW UP ON THIS ONE!! I DARE YOU!
 
R

Rockhound

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
408
0
0
Aelus, YOU are such a freaking BASTARD its SICK!!! This has absolutely nothing to do with winning votes. AMERICAN LIVES WERE LOST! And all you can think about is votes?!! YOU ARE A SICK, SICK PUPPY. Why don't you go tell that to those families. I'd like to KICK YOUR BUTT!

That figures, another foreigner writing this crap. HOW DARE YOU!
 
S

Soybomb

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
9,506
2
81
I"m a republican. What a crap story that was. The first paragraph alone lost all credibility. How does this guy know how long they've been planning it, what kind of "sophisticated" encryption and communications equipment they used. Hell I trust 128 bit encryption. The whole article is full of speculations and guesses. Clinton's not the president anymore either. Just let it go for now.

For god's sake I've got a spread spectrum cordless phone, encrytion isn't hard to find, there is no such thing as an unhackable computer network, etc. Its a fine piece of yellow journalism you dug up though.
 
F

FrontlineWarrior

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2000
4,905
1
0


<< It doesn't surprise me that the bush administration will try to abuse this catastrophy to win votes.

Aelus >>



please get your head out of your ass.
 
A

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
rockhound, why does the article only speak of clinton then? it's not like he was in command when the afghans were armed by the USA and provided with modern equipment.

if you can't set aside your emotions, don't discuss about this.

Aelus
 
A

AaronP

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
4,359
0
0
they are using radios that scramble their frequency and constantly cycle frequencys to talk to each other so no-one can listen. These radios were given to them by Bubba. I'm not saying that these terrorists who were in the US and doing that bombing are using these radios, but terrorists in the middle east are using them to undermine US interests.

 
R

Rockhound

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
408
0
0
Then when in the hell was he in command moron? He was the president prior to Bush for 8 years. Moron. It mentions only Clinton because it happened during the Clinton administration. Moron. Just like Clinton sold technology to china. Moron.

My emotions are with those families, and if any president, Republican or Democrat did such a thing I would be pissed. But for you to come out with this votes comment is way the hell out of line. They are obviously investigating this and trying to figure out how they did all this without anyone knowing. Part of the investigation. Moron. If the investigation leads to technology sold to them, then that's where it leads. Moron.
 
G

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Aelus, YOU are such a freaking BASTARD its SICK!!! This has absolutely nothing to do with winning votes. AMERICAN LIVES WERE LOST! And all you can think about is votes?!! YOU ARE A SICK, SICK PUPPY. Why don't you go tell that to those families. I'd like to KICK YOUR BUTT!

That figures, another foreigner writing this crap. HOW DARE YOU!

first off, calm down.

secondly, i don't think we should put down other people's opinons because they're foreigners... if anything, i think it would give them some objectivity. i enjoy watching the bbc for the reason that i often see points of view on there that i would NEVER have seen on any of the u.s. networks.
 
A

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
but the soviet/afghan war was BEFORE clintons administration, and the afghans were getting TONS of weapons from the USA. Don't you think they were also got satellite phones with encryption to communicate?

stop the namecalling, and don't call my kettle black.

Aelus
 
flavio

flavio

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,823
1
76
You guys are a little too gullible. One idiot links to some bashing article in what appears to be a christian right-wing slanted website with other stories like

Dems own morals showing - again
Exclusive: Paul Sperry blasts liberals good-'ol-boy hypocrisy

and you're calling for blood already.

Don't be foolish.

 
R

Rockhound

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
408
0
0
Sorry gopunk, but that crosses the line. I'm sorry. That is way, way beyond a simple opinion. How you could even think such a thing. Yea, Bush is just worried about votes. Yea right. Tell me about it. Sorry, but they didn't attack Belgians or anyone else with American equipment.
 
F

FrontlineWarrior

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2000
4,905
1
0


<< but the soviet/afghan war was BEFORE clintons administration, and the afghans were getting TONS of weapons from the USA. Don't you think they were also got satellite phones with encryption to communicate?

stop the namecalling, and don't call my kettle black.

Aelus >>



Sending guns half-way around the world is a lot different than giving terrorists equipment that prevents intelligence!!! MORON
 
A

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
frontlinewarrior, according to your logic preaching murder and statesponsored mass extinction is perfectly alright, but looking at a situation in a rational way is evil?

Aelus
 
R

Rockhound

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
408
0
0
Well, with Clinton's past record of selling stuff to China, would you put it past him? Yea, and he didn't do that either I suppose. Sure. Whatever.
 
X

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0

This is stupid and counter productive... (much like most of these venting threads)... first of all this article seems to lack alot of crediblity... if this were the case... some major newspaper would have broken the news first.

Second... pointing flaws in the president that has given us the most prosperous time in our nation's history is in bad form... he might have done some questionable personal things... but he is a patriot... and shouldn't be considered otherwise.
 
A

AaronP

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
4,359
0
0
but he is a patriot... and shouldn't be considered otherwise
-----

I don't consider Clinton a patriot, I think he's the world's greatest con-man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom