why is the earth's molten core still hot after billions of years?Reading article from 2 days ago in NYTimes by expert Dr. David Keith.
![]()
Opinion | What’s the Least Bad Way to Cool the Planet? (Published 2021)
Pretending that climate change can be solved with emissions cuts alone is a dangerous fantasy.www.nytimes.com
He's personally invested in carbon removal, started a company (Carbon Engineering) that's all about it. But he argues that geo-engineering is a real possibility, creating a reflective layer in the upper atmosphere using sulfur distributed by high flying airplanes and/or making low clouds more reflective by distributing salt into them.
A parameter he talks about is what it would/will take to decrease average global temperatures by a degree. I'm not seeing it, figure he's talking about Celsius, but is he? Working in the USA, it's possible he means Fahrenheit. What do you make of it?
- - - -
The summary paragraph at the end of the opinion essay:
Cooling the planet to reduce human suffering in this century will require carbon removal or solar geoengineering or both. The trade-offs between them are uncertain because little comparative research has been done. The fact that one or both are taboo in some green circles is a dreadful misstep of contemporary environmentalism. Climate justice demands fast action to cut emissions and serious exploration of pathways to a cooler future.
Decay of potassium keeps the mantle hot, keeping the core warm.why is the earth's molten core still hot after billions of years?
what kind of insulation does the core have?
why isnt starbucks copying that insulation to keep my coffee hot?
Decay of potassium keeps the mantle hot, keeping the core warm.
Most thought, but maybe a few were smarter and realized it wasn't flat. However show me the minority who realize we'll populate other solar systems and I'll show you idiots. We'll never get spacecraft to go fast enough to make it happen. Partly because as you approach the speed of light your craft gets heavier and heavier. And even light is too dang slow. And what's the point? When we get there we aren't going to find a Disneyland.At the moment, we are limited by the tools of our times. I've been saying this most my adult life. Even when I studied Physics I knew this and took everything taught as a subset of something yet unrealized. I cannot possibly predict the future, good or bad, so I leave the idea open to the possibilities. There was a time most thought the world was flat because they couldn't imagine seeing over the horizon.
Exactly!!!!!!By your stance we should wipe ourselves out and do Earth the favor.
ION drives ftw?However show me the minority who realize we'll populate other solar systems and I'll show you idiots.
We'll never get spacecraft to go fast enough to make it happen. Partly because as you approach the speed of light your craft gets heavier and heavier. And even light is too dang slow. And what's the point? When we get there we aren't going to find a Disneyland.![]()
Cause the men are on Mars and the womenz are making sammiches out of the moon, from Venus. Gotta love the USPS.Uranus is already pretty crowded.
Uranus is already pretty crowded.
Don't tell.You can always expand it bigger by adding more structures to it, it's an interesting property of Uranus.
What good is a dead wise man? And just because humans were removed from the picture wouldn't prohibit other disasters from happening to the Earth.Exactly!!!!!!
Like the wise man said ... If the Earth dies, you die. If you die, the Earth survives.
You are not looking at human history on a species level. Considering how far humans have come in the last two hundred years compared to the last two hundred thousand years is amazing. What makes you think that two hundred thousand years from now it will be bleak? It might, but never underestimate humans as a successful virus.Most thought, but maybe a few were smarter and realized it wasn't flat. However show me the minority who realize we'll populate other solar systems and I'll show you idiots. We'll never get spacecraft to go fast enough to make it happen. Partly because as you approach the speed of light your craft gets heavier and heavier. And even light is too dang slow. And what's the point? When we get there we aren't going to find a Disneyland.![]()
Not possible. The reason that stuff ended up in the ground was because no fungi during that era could eat tree bark. Trees filled valleys actual miles deep, then got drug underground by shifting plates. Won't happen again on this planet unless plants evolve something else that fungi can't eat.We need to plant swamp forests and keep the bozos away from them long enough for the trees to die and be buried. We could have a new Carboniferous age!
Not being able to populate other solar systems isn't a bleak outcome for the human race. We could be quite happy here if we can save the place.You are not looking at human history on a species level. Considering how far humans have come in the last two hundred years compared to the last two hundred thousand years is amazing. What makes you think that two hundred thousand years from now it will be bleak? It might, but never underestimate humans as a successful virus.
Whats does trees buried for millions of years do?Not possible. The reason that stuff ended up in the ground was because no fungi during that era could eat tree bark.
Trees filled valleys actual miles deep, then got drug underground by shifting plates. Won't happen again on this planet unless plants evolve something else that fungi can't eat.
Sequesters carbon.Whats does trees buried for millions of years do?
Turn into coal, mostly. We can't really make the burnt coal turn back into brick form very easily, or at least not at the scale we need.Whats does trees buried for millions of years do?
I had a conversation yesterday with Alex Carlin, which I'm going to broadcast on my radio show on Oct. 13. He's a musician, something of a climate expert (10+ years of investigation and activity). His self directed and edited documentary Alex in Russialand has won awards and has showings this month in the USA (US debut was Friday at Grauman's Chinese in Hollywood). Alex is optimistic about the climate, claims that the narrative about CO2 is fine insofar as controlling emissions, but CO2 removal is necessary to bring down global temperatures, all true, of course. He says oceans are key. He believes it will become clear very soon. He's written several articles concerning GW:Turn into coal, mostly. We can't really make the burnt coal turn back into brick form very easily, or at least not at the scale we need.
I had a conversation yesterday with Alex Carlin, which I'm going to broadcast on my radio show on Oct. 13. He's a musician, something of a climate expert (10 years of investigation and activity). His self directed and edited documentary Alex in Russialand has won awards and has showings this month in the USA (US debut was Friday at Grauman's Chinese in Hollywood). Alex is optimistic about the climate, claims that the narrative about CO2 is fine insofar as controlling emissions, but CO2 removal is necessary to bring down global temperatures, all true, of course. He says oceans are key. He believes it will become clear very soon. He's written several articles concerning GW:
![]()
Alex Carlin, Author at EXPOSEDbyCMD
www.exposedbycmd.org
After attending showings of his documentary this month in the US he heads back to Europe to present at a climate conference in November.
You are not looking at human history on a species level. Considering how far humans have come in the last two hundred years compared to the last two hundred thousand years is amazing. What makes you think that two hundred thousand years from now it will be bleak? It might, but never underestimate humans as a successful virus.
I'd be curious what he means by this, the oceans are already very quickly approaching a tipping point that will create a widespread acidification event which could easily destroy most complex life on our planet.He says oceans are key.
It does, but everything has it's limits, and we're testing them as is.I seem to remember that algae and stuff in the ocean sucks up way more CO2 and stuff than plants and trees on land and what not, could be wrong though.
Read his articles. Start withI'd be curious what he means by this, the oceans are already very quickly approaching a tipping point that will create a widespread acidification event which could easily destroy most complex life on our planet.
