Thank you, President Clinton

[her209]

We're better than you 😛

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: SuperTool

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

Originally posted by: DaiShan
Let me get this straight, you would rather have a president who had never had oral sex before because of his strong morals? Please. The current president squandered the largest surplus in history and the country has sunk into a recession which flared anew on the coat tails of his pressing for war. I think I would rather have a healthy economy and a scum bag running this country well than the gunslinging oaf we have now...

That last statement of yours speaks volumes about your character. Or lack thereof.

Yeah, character isn't going to feed the unemployed.

You'd be surprised.

 

[Yossarian]

The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: her209
We're better than you 😛

You are better than ... whom? For truth's sake, I hope you're talking to a small child.

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

Originally posted by: DaiShan
Let me get this straight, you would rather have a president who had never had oral sex before because of his strong morals? Please. The current president squandered the largest surplus in history and the country has sunk into a recession which flared anew on the coat tails of his pressing for war. I think I would rather have a healthy economy and a scum bag running this country well than the gunslinging oaf we have now...

That last statement of yours speaks volumes about your character. Or lack thereof.

Thank you for putting into words what I had trouble with. 🙂

so death is better then a good economy ?

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

Yeah but Clinton was getting Blow Jobs in the Oval Office and as an American I'd rather starve than have my President get his weasal greased by some fat intern. Thank God for the Hypocrite Republicans who made Political hay with this or it might have been overlooked by the majority of voters..wait it was wasn't it. Nevermind.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: her209
We're better than you 😛

You are better than ... whom? For truth's sake, I hope you're talking to a small child.

Small child or you..same difference.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

If you cover your eyes and walk around with your hand out hoping not to hit anything, then you'd be right. But look at what all he did. He ruined our future by doing the things he did. He considerably crippled our military (duh, do I have to explain THAT significance to you?). I didn't think it was possible, but he turned the White House into a JOKE in the eyes of the rest of the world with his scandals. Clinton was worse for this country because all he did was sit on his ass trying to figure out how to make it a warm, cushy, okay-on-the-outside-but-empty-on-the-inside kind of country. Kinda like the man himself.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: her209
We're better than you 😛

You are better than ... whom? For truth's sake, I hope you're talking to a small child.

Small child or you..same difference.

Jesus, Red. Stop making jokes unless you're going to make them funny. You sound like you're missing a chromosome.

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

no clinton was smarter.

he had smarter financial advisors then what bush has.

i dont think it was luck.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

Originally posted by: DaiShan
Let me get this straight, you would rather have a president who had never had oral sex before because of his strong morals? Please. The current president squandered the largest surplus in history and the country has sunk into a recession which flared anew on the coat tails of his pressing for war. I think I would rather have a healthy economy and a scum bag running this country well than the gunslinging oaf we have now...

That last statement of yours speaks volumes about your character. Or lack thereof.

Thank you for putting into words what I had trouble with. 🙂

so death is better then a good economy ?

The President itsn't responsible for the quality of the economy. You aren't going to die simply because we don't have a scum bag in office.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: her209
We're better than you 😛

You are better than ... whom? For truth's sake, I hope you're talking to a small child.

Small child or you..same difference.

Jesus, Red. Stop making jokes unless you're going to make them funny. You sound like you're missing a chromosome.

To bad I don't have an extra one like you do!

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

no clinton was smarter.

he had smarter financial advisors then what bush has.

i dont think it was luck.

If Clinton was that smart, why'd he let Hilary run the country?

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: her209
We're better than you 😛

You are better than ... whom? For truth's sake, I hope you're talking to a small child.

Small child or you..same difference.

Jesus, Red. Stop making jokes unless you're going to make them funny. You sound like you're missing a chromosome.

To bad I don't have an extra one like you do!

That's more like it.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

no clinton was smarter.

he had smarter financial advisors then what bush has.

i dont think it was luck.

If Clinton was that smart, why'd he let Hilary run the country?

I think you have Clinton and his wife mistaken for Ronald and Nancy Reagan (and her Astrologer)

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

If you cover your eyes and walk around with your hand out hoping not to hit anything, then you'd be right. But look at what all he did. He ruined our future by doing the things he did. He considerably crippled our military (duh, do I have to explain THAT significance to you?). I didn't think it was possible, but he turned the White House into a JOKE in the eyes of the rest of the world with his scandals. Clinton was worse for this country because all he did was sit on his ass trying to figure out how to make it a warm, cushy, okay-on-the-outside-but-empty-on-the-inside kind of country. Kinda like the man himself.

Clinton didn't ruin our military. He shrunk it, but that was the right thing to do. You grow military during war and shrink it during peace time. If you keep growing the military peace or war, soon you'll be like North Korea. The military Clinton left to Bush did just fine in Afganistan. Besides 300 Billion/year on defense spending did absolutely jack to stop 9/11. If you think extra 100 billion would have, you are very dumb or very misguided.
And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

no clinton was smarter.

he had smarter financial advisors then what bush has.

i dont think it was luck.

If Clinton was that smart, why'd he let Hilary run the country?

where did you hear this at ???

just more crap that you spew.

atleast the country wasn't run by miss cleo during the regean era.

btw i do have proof of that. even funnier is that what was in nancy's book.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: SuperTool

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

If you cover your eyes and walk around with your hand out hoping not to hit anything, then you'd be right. But look at what all he did. He ruined our future by doing the things he did. He considerably crippled our military (duh, do I have to explain THAT significance to you?). I didn't think it was possible, but he turned the White House into a JOKE in the eyes of the rest of the world with his scandals. Clinton was worse for this country because all he did was sit on his ass trying to figure out how to make it a warm, cushy, okay-on-the-outside-but-empty-on-the-inside kind of country. Kinda like the man himself.

Clinton didn't ruin our military. He shrunk it, but that was the right thing to do. You grow military during war and shrink it during peace time. If you keep growing the military peace or war, soon you'll be like North Korea. The military Clinton left to Bush did just fine in Afganistan. Besides 300 Billion/year on defense spending did absolutely jack to stop 9/11. If you think extra 100 billion would have, you are very dumb or very misguided.
And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

I would rather feel protected than be a sitting duck, and it's that simple!

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: PipBoy
The fact is that this country experienced 8 years of prosperity and relative peace during Clinton's terms. That could have been partly due to the work of his predecessors, planetary alignment, or dumb luck. Whatever it was, we were better off then than we are now.

no clinton was smarter.

he had smarter financial advisors then what bush has.

i dont think it was luck.

If Clinton was that smart, why'd he let Hilary run the country?

where did you hear this at ???

just more crap that you spew.

atleast the country wasn't run by miss cleo during the regean era.

btw i do have proof of that. even funnier is that what was in nancy's book.

Why does Nancy's running the country negate Hilary's running the country? Yes, they both happened. But what does Nancy Reagan have to do with Clinton vs. Bush?

 

[glenn1]

And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

So if he were unpopular, that would have been ok?

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: glenn1

And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

So if he were unpopular, that would have been ok?

To most Clinton supporters, apparently so!

 

[DaiShan]

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

Originally posted by: DaiShan
Let me get this straight, you would rather have a president who had never had oral sex before because of his strong morals? Please. The current president squandered the largest surplus in history and the country has sunk into a recession which flared anew on the coat tails of his pressing for war. I think I would rather have a healthy economy and a scum bag running this country well than the gunslinging oaf we have now...

That last statement of yours speaks volumes about your character. Or lack thereof.

Well thank you that is exactly what I needed some guy over the internet to criticize my character. Did you know it is a crime in many states to engage in oral sex? Since when has it been the duty of government to legislate morality? Yes he lied under oath that was a serious breech of conduct, however you have to ask yourself why he was even put into that position? The point of the matter is Ken Star broadly overstepped his powers as an independent prosecutor. While I do not condone Clinton purjering himself, he should not have been put into that situation. America is one of the most (not the most due to radical islamic fundementalists) modest countries on earth. In Europe there is no problem showing topless women on television, and there are many more nude beaches. Why? They see the human figure differently than we do, we have this overwhelming urge to cover up anything that could be considered scandalous. We bury our heads in the sand in hopes that it might go away. Next time think about your personal priorities as well as those of the Government. If you feel so strongly that you value moral rightness over economic stability and general well-being of this country, well then to quote you "that speaks volumes about your character" I am proud to know we have someone so high and mighty that they can afford to judge others based on moral convictions rather than the facts. I applaud you.

 

[Mean MrMustard]

1. Thank you for introducing us to Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones,
Monica Lewinsky, Dolly Kyle Browning, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita
Broderick. Did I leave anyone out?

2. Thank you for teaching my children about oral sex. I had really
planned to wait until they were older to discuss it with them, but now
they know more about it than I did as a senior in college.

I believe we have the media and a "certain" Congress to blame for that.

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: glenn1

And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

So if he were unpopular, that would have been ok?

If the GOP had actually convinced the American people that Clinton deserved to be removed, he wouldn't have been so popular. Remember Nixon?
Of course they pretended they knew better than the American public, and proceeded to impeach him without public support behind them.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: ffmcobalt

Originally posted by: glenn1

And the joke to the rest of the world was the Congressional GOP witchhunt going after a popular president over lying about an affair in court.

So if he were unpopular, that would have been ok?

To most Clinton supporters, apparently so!

If he were unpopular I doubt the Republicans would have felt the need to make a big deal out of it. Hey they themselves lost a copuple of their leaders because they were found to be Hypocrites . Losing them was like taking one for the team.

Why does Nancy's running the country negate Hilary's running the country? Yes, they both happened. But what does Nancy Reagan have to do with Clinton vs. Bush?

What makes you think a Meglomaniac like Clinton would allow his Bitch wife to run the country and what has any of this to do with Bush?