Texas vs Ohio

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: charrison
OUr manufacturing base has never been larger or productive than it is today, it just so happens it required far fewer people to produce what we do.

I disagree with that statement.

chicago fed disagrees with you

I never said output wasn't better per the number of people employeed in the "US". I stated that the many hundreds of thousands (or millions) of foreign workers now making sub-assemblies and sending them to the US for final assembly (i.e. MADE IN THE USA) skew the numbers. It's taking far more people to make the USA items than just the USA workers. Nowhere in the presentation (1st one) did I see anything about Mexican and other foreign workers making sub-assemblies for US manufacturing.

where do mexican sub assemblies fit into this? you disputed that the manufacturing base is larger and more productive than at any other point in history, i provided links to hard facts showing that it is, in fact, more productive and more efficient than ever. are you saying that, somehow, the mexican sub-assembly work is being counted in the US production stats?