nakedfrog
No Lifer
- Apr 3, 2001
- 61,238
- 16,719
- 136
Hard disagree.Such a similar line of thought is why the sugar industry in the U.S remains a monopoly/given government protection.
Hard disagree.Such a similar line of thought is why the sugar industry in the U.S remains a monopoly/given government protection.
I don't think it's manipulation to expect a consumer to inform themselves with information readily available on a product's container, and it's UTTERLY ABSURD to make a comparison between this and victim blaming in rape.You eyeroll, but those conditioning tactics have been used to abuse people for centuries. Manipulation is a fucking horrific tool, and we shouldn't normalize it just because someone wants our money.
And false equivalence be damned, blaming the victim is blaming the victim.
Ugh, it's a fucking two dollar box of pasta. That's what I bought when I bought pasta, but I never harbored notions that it was made in Italy.
Ah, so you ascribe to the 'it doesn't affect me, so it doesn't count as wrong' house of morality. What are your opinions on public treatment of homelessness by chance?I don't think it's manipulation to expect a consumer to inform themselves with information readily available on a product's container, and it's UTTERLY ABSURD to make a comparison between this and victim blaming in rape.
Takes maybe five seconds to look at the package and see where it's made. What's false about saying Barilla is Italy's #1 pasta? Why does that imply the stuff on the shelf was made in Italy? We have bakeries and soda plants and everything everywhere. I don't see the "manipulation" here, is the Barilla made in Iowa worse, even if it's made from the same recipe, just because it's made in Iowa? How is there even a victim here? If it said "The finest Italian pasta" on the box, then maybe you've got a case for false advertising, but it doesn't.
LOL no. Ass.Ah, so you ascribe to the 'it doesn't affect me, so it doesn't count as wrong' house of morality. What are your opinions on public treatment of homelessness by chance?
Okay then, how about predatory lending practices by collusion between banks and real estate firms leading up to the '08 housing crash? Was that just the victim's fault too? Shouldn't they have just read the paperwork?LOL no. Ass.
Okay then, how about predatory lending practices by collusion between banks and real estate firms leading up to the '08 housing crash? Was that just the victim's fault too? Shouldn't they have just read the paperwork?
Maybe she just thinks no damage from injury means no injury?Ah, so you ascribe to the 'it doesn't affect me, so it doesn't count as wrong' house of morality. What are your opinions on public treatment of homelessness by chance?
And to clarify, I'm not stating that this stuff IS illegal, just that it should be.Maybe she just thinks no damage from injury means no injury?
My amateur research into law has made me realize "Injuria sine damno"(injury without damage) is a very real concept.
If someone simply walks through another's yard but doesn't do anything, it's still civil trespass, legally speaking. Now, to enforce that law, that would require considerable expenditure of time and money in a local circuit court, but should someone actually do that, that would be granted as a nominal judgment by a judge.
Due to the cost of enforcing the common law in civil court, obviously small trespasses are not enforced and thus a de facto state of anarchy exists regarding civil trespass without actual damage.
![]()
Injuria sine damno
SRDLawNotes provides law notes for Law Student and Lawyer, Covering all subjects including Law of Crime, Cyber Law, Insurance Law, Property Law, etc.www.srdlawnotes.com
I think there should be some minimal level of expectation that a consumer inform themselves, the product's origin is on the product packaging and is not misrepresented. I do not believe there is a victim here, other than society at large because no one wins here (besides the lawyers), the consumers will get a coupon for fifty cents off pasta, Barilla will update their packaging in some fashion, and lawyers will get a lot of money. No good will be accomplished.Okay then, how about predatory lending practices by collusion between banks and real estate firms leading up to the '08 housing crash? Was that just the victim's fault too? Shouldn't they have just read the paperwork?
And false equivalence be damned, blaming the victim is blaming the victim.
We normalize new behaviors based on iterating previously normalized behaviors. Permitting snake oil salesmen iterates into intentionally branded false advertisement, which iterates into direct exploitation of human nature via advanced psychological techniques. If we nailed those intentional false advertisers to a fucking tree rather than sweeping under the rug of 'buyer beware', we wouldn't have to deal with shit like payday loans, aforementioned predatory lending practices, etc.I think there should be some minimal level of expectation that a consumer inform themselves, the product's origin is on the product packaging and is not misrepresented. I do not believe there is a victim here, other than society at large because no one wins here (besides the lawyers), the consumers will get a coupon for fifty cents off pasta, Barilla will update their packaging in some fashion, and lawyers will get a lot of money. No good will be accomplished.
This isn't false advertising. This isn't snake oil. Minimal fucking due diligence to look at a fucking package and see where it's made.We normalize new behaviors based on iterating previously normalized behaviors. Permitting snake oil salesmen iterates into intentionally branded false advertisement, which iterates into direct exploitation of human nature via advanced psychological techniques. If we nailed those intentional false advertisers to a fucking tree rather than sweeping under the rug of 'buyer beware', we wouldn't have to deal with shit like payday loans, aforementioned predatory lending practices, etc.
If we have to rely on ourselves for every goddamned thing, what's the point of having a civilization to begin with?
Sure, I mean, it's just a simple lie. No big deal. As long as you say 'the front of the package is a lie' on the back it's all kosher right? Including kosher products?Minimal fucking due diligence to look at a fucking package and see where it's made.
It's not a lie. There is no lie taking place here. There is no manipulation.Sure, I mean, it's just a simple lie. No big deal. As long as you say 'the front of the package is a lie' on the back it's all kosher right? Including kosher products?
Nah, that's stupid.For what it's worth, I agree with you regarding lawyers. More people not making it into the fallout shelters. Doesn't change my stance though.
Products should be black text on a white label, explaining what it is or what it does. Any deviance from product language or usage of relative terms should be punished harshly.
Maybe not with Barilla. There's plenty of other examples of outright lies that are asterix'd into legal compliance (looking at you, entire homeopathic section of stores). It's also still manipulative and doesn't counter my original point about using psychological tactics to get money from people.It's not a lie. There is no lie taking place here. There is no manipulation.
If Barilla sold boxes, with pieces of paper inside with just PICTURES of pasta on them, that you were supposed to boil and SAY "tastes like pasta", THEN you might have a point of comparison to what "homeopathic" medications are like. Otherwise, it's a BAD analogy, and unnecessary hyperbole.Maybe not with Barilla. There's plenty of other examples of outright lies that are asterix'd into legal compliance (looking at you, entire homeopathic section of stores).
When Barilla was first available in the US some of it was the "made in Italy" kind but the pasta we get in CT now is made in NY State and the sauce (which isn't very good at all IMO) is made in the midwest.
Far as I can tell Barilla pasta is pretty much identical from either location (never had imported Barilla sauce) but that isn't always the case with formerly imported foods.
Ackshewelly, my first response to you was regarding the NY Bakery Texas Toast, which is from neither Texas (irrelevant) or NY (relevant). I give zero shits about Barilla specifically because afaik they aren't presenting anything false on the pasta. It's still manipulative but it's not false.Well, I'm bloody well talking about Barilla, have the decency to quit pretending I'm talking about other things or projecting my stance on this specific matter to assume I think rape victims were asking for it while I hunt the homeless for sport and get some guy to sign up for a payday loan to get a predatory mortgage for his new house, you cotton-headed ninny-muggins!
Ackshewelly, the post that started this entire back-and-forth today was this one, whereupon I continually referred to the Barilla situation afterwards. You replied to that one, and here we are, with you claiming you don't care about the Barilla thing when that's literally all I've been talking about. I DEMAND RETRIBUTION!Ackshewelly, my first response to you was regarding the NY Bakery Texas Toast, which is from neither Texas (irrelevant) or NY (relevant). I give zero shits about Barilla specifically because afaik they aren't presenting anything false on the pasta. It's still manipulative but it's not false.
Ugh, it's a fucking two dollar box of pasta. That's what I bought when I bought pasta, but I never harbored notions that it was made in Italy.
If we have to rely on ourselves for every goddamned thing, what's the point of having a civilization to begin with?