Texas is on the middle of the country, the east side is nearly equal distance between Florida and CA. It would not be ideal location, and most likely would cause a huge loss of visitors to Disneyland, which is why it's ideal to have Disney world in the east coast, as it could take as much as 50% of Disney Lands stateside business away if Disney world was to relocate to Texas, and completely re-established itself. Due to Disney world then being closer to 75% of the country than it's current 50%. I don't know if Disney Land could survive with that kind of loss in that situation.Wat?
Put it in East Texas (don’t actually). East Texas is closer to Florida than it is to West Texas.
Heck, I remember this Goldwater ad. Saws off the whole east coast.How prophetic was that wascally wabbit?
![]()
Not quite. Texas is a full 1/3 the driving distance from Disney World to Disneyland and the center is in TX but the east side is not nearly half way between the two.Texas is on the middle of the country, the east side is nearly equal distance between Florida and CA. It would not be ideal location, and most likely would cause a huge loss of visitors to Disneyland, which is why it's ideal to have Disney world in the east coast, as it could take as much as 50% of Disney Lands stateside business away if Disney world was to relocate to Texas, and completely re-established itself. I don't know if Disney Land could survive with that kind of loss in that situation.
You are looking at it from the perspective of Disney world / Disneyland only serving Houston. while ignoring the rest of the country. The drive time between Florida(Disney world/land) and Texas (Houston) isn't relievent when you step back and look at the country as a whole. Heck, you have to actually use figured that represent Florida as a whole as well, if you where going to try and use milage between the states (Disney world's current location means nothing because it would be in Houston, not Florida)).. not just where Disney world is currently located to even be accurate.Not quite. Texas is a full 1/3 the driving distance from Disney World to Disneyland and the center is in TX but the east side is not nearly half way between the two.
Houston to Disney World FL~ 950miles
Houston to Disney Land CA ~ 1550 miles
East Texas is about 38% the distance to
Disneyland
I’m done on this point. It’s fine to have the opinion TX is to close to CA.
haha move from one shit hole conservative state to another. no thanks. if they move it will be a liberal state that favors them.
True, or embrace the ice world theme. One sunny and one winteryThe problem would be finding a liberal-leaning state with a decent annual climate. VERY FEW people would want to visit Disney Ice World...
the frozen soundtrack would be on 24/7True, or embrace the ice world theme. One sunny and one wintery![]()
As Abott has already pulled similar shit to Desantis I’m going to say stay out of TX.Getting to Rosenberg/Sugar Land from Hobby Airport is a chore during rush hour. From Bush is a nightmare.
Maybe they could revive the AstroWorld site. Heck, maybe even Peppermint Park.
Disney has been in Florida since 1971 and has significantly contributed to Florida's economy ever since. That little prick DeSantis has been politically active in Florida since 2008(?)
NYC Disney Landhaha move from one shit hole conservative state to another. no thanks. if they move it will be a liberal state that favors them.
we can argue pointlessly until the cows come home about which geographic location would be best but the idea of putting disneyworld in texas bankrupting disneyland is just LULZ. I would bet they could put it in phoenix and disneyland's attendance wouldnt drop 10%.You are looking at it from the perspective of Disney world / Disneyland only serving Houston. while ignoring the rest of the country. The drive time between Florida(Disney world/land) and Texas (Houston) isn't relievent when you step back and look at the country as a whole. Heck, you have to actually use figured that represent Florida as a whole as well, if you where going to try and use milage between the states (Disney world's current location means nothing because it would be in Houston, not Florida)).. not just where Disney world is currently located to even be accurate.
If Disney world moved to Texas, It would most likely put Disneyland out of business.
Maybe Disney should promise moving to GA if voters turn that state blue. Dems should promise the same deal as Flahaha move from one shit hole conservative state to another. no thanks. if they move it will be a liberal state that favors them.
LOL! We are not talking about a gas station that can have multiple locations in close proximity competing for the same business, with little overhead in comparison and still stay in business. Disneyland can't afford to be in direct competition with Disney world, as the cost to operate Disney Land in California are substantially higher, and would still be, even if Disney World was centrally located.we can argue pointlessly until the cows come home about which geographic location would be best but the idea of putting disneyworld in texas bankrupting disneyland is just LULZ. I would bet they could put it in phoenix and disneyland's attendance wouldnt drop 10%.
Disney has a few options.Not quite. Texas is a full 1/3 the driving distance from Disney World to Disneyland and the center is in TX but the east side is not nearly half way between the two.
Houston to Disney World FL~ 950miles
Houston to Disney Land CA ~ 1550 miles
East Texas is about 38% the distance to
Disneyland
I’m done on this point. It’s fine to have the opinion TX is to close to CA.
#3 is an interesting point from someone concerned about government retaliation for speech.Disney has a few options.
Maybe when Disney moves, they could build a new park with something for the NAMBLA crowd. It's amazing how the Progressheviks now support massive companies getting special treatments.
- Pack up Disney World and move it to TX. Buying 40+ square miles of land should be super cheap in the current real estate market. Also, moving multiple theme parks and supporting infrastructure should only take a few U-hauls.
- Leave the current Disney World in-place and build a brand new one in TX. Again, super cheap and easy to replicate 50+ years of building on 40+ square miles.
- Stop trying to be political activists and instead focus on your core business which is entertaining young children.
The vast majority of Disneyland's visitors are locals. Many estimates over 80%. They have actually had to make annual passes much shittier, and much more expensive, and then just straight up stop selling them because the local demand is so high. WDW also gets a lot of locals, but most people that fly to a park will fly to WDW not DLR.Texas is on the middle of the country, the east side is nearly equal distance between Florida and CA. It would not be ideal location, and most likely would cause a huge loss of visitors to Disneyland, which is why it's ideal to have Disney world in the east coast, as it could take as much as 50% of Disney Lands stateside business away if Disney world was to relocate to Texas, and completely re-established itself. Due to Disney world then being closer to 75% of the country than it's current 50%. I don't know if Disney Land could survive with that kind of loss in that situation.
Disney could open a third resort in Texas and keep DLR and WDW and attendance wouldn't drop significantly at any park. Both resorts have turned off annual pass sells and have extremely high ticket/hotel/food inflation, yet every year the crowds go up. DLR is almost entirely supported locally. The non-locals are people that seek it out or are in LA for other reasons.LOL! We are not talking about a gas station that can have multiple locations in close proximity competing for the same business, with little overhead in comparison and still stay in business. Disneyland can't afford to be in direct competition with Disney world, as the cost to operate Disney Land in California are substantially higher, and would still be, even if Disney World was centrally located.
Even if you are correct, and Disney Land only loss 10% of their business, that is enough to bankrupt them and put them out of business because of the associated costs that go into keeping the Amusement park running. In which case, Disney would close them down and focus on the centrally located amusement park. There is a reason they opened Disney world on the East coast instead of centrally, because they where wise enough to know that only one would survive if they did so because of the costs associated with running similar themed amusement parks that can't sustain being in direct competition with each other.
This. Disneyland is like at capacity half the time and theyre raising their ticket prices year over year so they can try and maximize the revenue they generate. People bitch and butch as they pull out their wallet to pony up yet again.Disney could open a third resort in Texas and keep DLR and WDW and attendance wouldn't drop significantly at any park. Both resorts have turned off annual pass sells and have extremely high ticket/hotel/food inflation, yet every year the crowds go up. DLR is almost entirely supported locally. The non-locals are people that seek it out or are in LA for other reasons.
A Disneyland Texas would likely mostly be supported by Texans and connecting states, and WDW would by far see the most impact but they have many levers they can pull to recover attendance there.
There is also a big difference in the demand for Disney parks in 2022 than there was in 1971. There was a time when people thought a second theme park in Florida wouldn't succeed, but now there are 3 more plus 2 themed water parks (plus 3 Universal Parks, Seaworld, Discovery Cove, Busch Gardens, Legoland, and Fun Spot all within 45 minutes).