zinfamous
No Lifer
Let's not be stupid by pretending its 1860. The world has changed.
Shouldn't someone be saying this to Texas?
Let's not be stupid by pretending its 1860. The world has changed.
Well, I've got my rights to comment, since I was born there with some three or four earlier generations going back to 1850 in a little place called Pana Maria near San Antonio. We had the Bushes beat by almost a century.
If they do, it won't be very long before Tex-Ass reverts to total Mexican control...and is just another Mexican state. (as compared to one of the United States that has a large Mexican population.
Shouldn't someone be saying this to Texas?
Good one. 😀
In my mind, part of this discussion revolves around the disconnect between what the majority of Texans feel about seceding as evidenced by those Texans posting in this thread, and what their legislators are apparently doing in earnest to make it happen. This, with the logical conclusion that those legislators who are pressing for seceding represent the clear majority viewpoint and convictions of those that voted them into office.
..snip..
I don't think anyone in the history of the world ever underestimated Texan pride.I think you underestimate the sense of Texas pride people have here.
I don't think anyone in the history of the world ever underestimated Texan pride.
It looks like the only point that hasn't been made is the obvious one, perhaps Texas is better off on their own. Right off the bat their piece of a staggering national debt goes away. Then they get to control their borders as they see fit. Those two reasons are enough to consider the idea.
Sometime -- maybe back in the '80s or '90s -- someone published a long newspaper article on "redefining states."
There was a reasoning behind it that administration of the various state jurisdictions would be much more efficient. But of course, the problem arises with long historical or cultural tradition, and a total upending of the status-quo.
Of course, the model they proposed also slivered Texas into two or more pieces. the Rednecks would be totally outraged.
Lately, there's been a discussion in CA to split the state into pieces. Some folks in the north think they're getting the shit end of the stick as it stands. They want to create a new state called "Jefferson" or something like that.
And that still ain't gonna happen, or so I predict.
Why on earth would Texas rid itself of its portion of federal debt of it seceded? Good luck with that one, haha.
How comparably well off Texas would be on its own would depend almost entirely on its relationship with the remaining United States. If its relations were good, then almost any net federal contributor would be better off as you could just free load on military, etc. If their relationship was bad, look out. They would be in deep shit.
Why on earth would Texas rid itself of its portion of federal debt of it seceded? Good luck with that one, haha.
How comparably well off Texas would be on its own would depend almost entirely on its relationship with the remaining United States. If its relations were good, then almost any net federal contributor would be better off as you could just free load on military, etc. If their relationship was bad, look out. They would be in deep shit.
Stupid of Texas to even vote on. they won't and can't.
They would lose far more then they would gain.
The welfare state that props them up.What exactly would they lose?
I'm not sure how far I buy into that. If true, I wonder if it's the result of nature or nurture, if it's innate or if culture largely determines its expression.
The welfare state that props them up.
What exactly would they lose?
I'm no expert but think of all of the federal facilities (25 Bureau of Prison facilities, NASA, military bases, etc.) that would pull out, leaving many locals looking for jobs and devastating local economies that depend on those workers spending their paychecks at their businesses. Then add on them starting with a massive debt as they would have to take on their portion of our debt and you end up with a situation where what is now booming turns into an economic disaster.
I'm sure that there are a few more reasons it's a bad idea but those ones stand out to me.
The welfare state that props them up.
Not to mention the military that protects them.
If Texas leaves they're going to have to make do with less or pay more in taxes. No more getting more in federal money than paying out in federal taxes.
They wouldn't have to take on their portion of the US debt because they would be a new sovereign nation with a new currency.
As far as economics, yall yanks forget how much of your energy runs through a very few states that yall keep calling "welfare" states. If Louisiana was to join Texas our economy would be flush with money simply because you wouldn't have any other choice in the world to buy your energy for. Hell it would take at least a decade (assuming no long ongoing environmental lawsuits) to even think about replacing just the refining capacity. Even if yall can magically replace the refining capacity in a decade the rest of the infrastructure would be a monumental excursion that would probably take 5 years just to get a design approved. Think the Keystone pipeline was hard then imagine trying to replace the energy ports (Louisiana has the only in the country that can offload Supermax crude carriers), most of your domestic energy supply, a metric fuckton of your refining capacity and the biggest distribution network in the country. Oh and lets not forget (assuming Louisiana goes with them which their population and .gov is crazy enough to go with if Texas pulls it off) two of the countries largest ports.
There are a bunch of states, assuming one or two and not 10, that could bounce and we'd probably be "meh" about it but not so much with the states that everyone hopes will leave (well, maybe except Florida).
Tl;Dr Texas ain't going nowhere and you all should be glad because we really need those southern fuckers.
Why would they pay it? They'd be a sovereign nation and could simply say no. Would the rest of the US go to war over it? Seems unlikely.
Why on earth would Texas rid itself of its portion of federal debt of it seceded? Good luck with that one, haha.
How comparably well off Texas would be on its own would depend almost entirely on its relationship with the remaining United States. If its relations were good, then almost any net federal contributor would be better off as you could just free load on military, etc. If their relationship was bad, look out. They would be in deep shit.