They receive about $30 Billion every year. I think that's a lot.
Now I hear them complaining that if only they had more money they could have cured Ebola. Really?
The NIH wastes a lot of money. One example is $3.4 million to study backrubs by chiropractors. That is but one of many examples of dubious spending.
When the NIH can explain why they spent that money on backrubs instead of Ebola, and it better be damn persuasive, then maybe we talk more money
But it looks very much to me like they have a 'priority' problem, not a funding problem.
Here are more dubious expenditures of money. Somehow the NIH thought these were better uses of money than Ebola:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidma...sages-for-rabbits-meditation-for-hot-flashes/
Fern