1) passports
2) I sincerely doubt that there is so much air travel coming from the affected parts of west Africa that there would be world wide economic impact. Eyjafjallajokull blocked routes between Europe and the US for almost a week, flying over ebola wouldn't do that.
Travel bans are costly and ineffective.
http://www.vox.com/2014/10/18/6994413/research-travel-bans-ebola-virus-outbreak
We need to use our heads here, not act hysterically.
Lalala fingers-in-ears. We should run things based on how we feel, not on actual evidence. /sTravel bans are costly and ineffective.
http://www.vox.com/2014/10/18/6994413/research-travel-bans-ebola-virus-outbreak
We need to use our heads here, not act hysterically.
Claudine Burton-Jeangros, a sociology professor at the University of Geneva, said that panic over the disease springs from a paradox at the heart of modern life: the more we master the world through science and technology the more frightened we are of those things we cant control or understand. We live in very secure societies and like to think we know what will happen tomorrow. There is no place in our rational and scientific world for the unknown.
Dr. Petra Dickmann, who runs a risk-communication consultancy in London, said many other diseases pose a far bigger threat to life but Ebola had taken on fearsome dimensions.
We have been watching Africans dying for months, but think that Africans die all the time from nasty diseases that we dont have, she said. We need to get Ebola out of this box of a scary African monster and start communicating the real risks clearly, she said.
The US wouldn't need to impose a travel ban, all they would need to do is stop issuing/cancel all current travel visas from the countries with ebola. Without a travel visa you can't board a plane to the US. All affected countries are not on the list of countries that have reciprocal short stay visa agreements with the US.
The only way that works is if you have an absolutely secure border. Even East Germany didn't have that. The obvious way to circumvent your idea is to go to another nation in the Americas and get through be another means. No scheme has ever worked and they've been tried.
Wow, not only are a dumbass you're a jackass too.Should we remove "home of the brave" from the national anthem? I mean cheese eating surrender monkeys have Medecins Sans Frontieres in Africa treating Ebola patients in hellish conditions, Cuba is sending 150 doctors and nurses to Africa, and the US is running around like a headless chicken screaming about closing borders because there are 3 cases in a country of 300 million.
Cuban doctors are going to Africa under those conditions. Americans are running like headless chickens despite having 10 times the medical spending per capita.
Cuban doctors are going to Africa under those conditions. Americans are running like headless chickens despite having 10 times the medical spending per capita.
Travel bans are costly and ineffective.
http://www.vox.com/2014/10/18/6994413/research-travel-bans-ebola-virus-outbreak
We need to use our heads here, not act hysterically.
Fair enough article, but I disagree with some of their conclusions. By canceling west African visas and passports, no matter what other country they connect to, they will not be able to enter the US. Period. I am also highly skeptical that they will go to Mexico, hire a 'coyote', and cross the border that way. Highly skeptical.
The article also mentions that airport screenings are ineffective, as we have seem. Duncan passed right through an airport screening, so using that as a preventative measure seems kind of silly. Another piece that you are not considering is that travels bans have been shown to aid in slowing the outbreak. Just look at the other bordering nations that all implemented travel bans. They are now starting to control the outbreak.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-10-16-14-24-38
Nobody is saying not to try and stop the outbreak at its source. That is the best first step. But to not take steps to protect this country is a little arrogant to me. It smacks of the "it can't possibly happen here" mentality. You would think that the small outbreak in Dallas would have changed a few minds about that.
Wow, not only are a dumbass you're a jackass too.
Cuba will not allow those workers to return if they get sick :
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/...ola-in-Africa-from-Returning-if-They-Get-Sick
Fair enough article, but I disagree with some of their conclusions. By canceling west African visas and passports, no matter what other country they connect to, they will not be able to enter the US. Period. I am also highly skeptical that they will go to Mexico, hire a 'coyote', and cross the border that way. Highly skeptical.
The article also mentions that airport screenings are ineffective, as we have seem. Duncan passed right through an airport screening, so using that as a preventative measure seems kind of silly. Another piece that you are not considering is that travels bans have been shown to aid in slowing the outbreak. Just look at the other bordering nations that all implemented travel bans. They are now starting to control the outbreak.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-10-16-14-24-38
Nobody is saying not to try and stop the outbreak at its source. That is the best first step. But to not take steps to protect this country is a little arrogant to me. It smacks of the "it can't possibly happen here" mentality. You would think that the small outbreak in Dallas would have changed a few minds about that.
800 British NHS medical personnel volunteer to go to Sierra Leone
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/17/nhs-medics-volunteer-sierra-leone-ebola-nursing-call-up
Keeping calm an carrying on :thumbsup:
Meanwhile, in the "home of the brave," we are running scared with 3 cases in a country of 300,000,000 that spends twice as much as Europeans per capita on health care.
Keeping calm an carrying on :thumbsup:
Meanwhile, in the "home of the brave," we are running scared with 3 cases in a country of 300,000,000 that spends twice as much as Europeans per capita on health care.
The problem with these kind of statements is that they demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of the mathematics behind Ebola, as well as not understanding what a level 4 biohazard means. Drinking the cool-aid is probably an appropriate analogy.Can't remember who said it, paraphrasing here:
"More Americans have been dumped by Taylor Swift than have Ebola."
