Texas abortion law: Judge bans state from enforcing regulations

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Which again does not mean crap. It is not like the supreme court has a history of upholding human rights.

200 years ago you would have been using the supreme court to justify your ownership of slaves.




I choose to believe that life should be protected.
In another thread today, the one on the Wisconsin voter ID law, you said that liberals should "follow the law" even though they don't like it. You even objected to their filing lawsuits (a completely lawful activity) to overturn or block the law. But now, you're telling us that if you don't respect a particular law, the law doesn't mean crap.

In other words, you're an unprincipled moron.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
In another thread today, the one on the Wisconsin voter ID law, you said that liberals should "follow the law" even though they don't like it. You even objected to their filing lawsuits (a completely lawful activity) to overturn or block the law. But now, you're telling us that if you don't respect a particular law, the law doesn't mean crap.

In other words, you're an unprincipled moron.

I've long suspected that Texashiker is a closeted chickenfucker (explains his chickens), which is why his jealousy of gay marriage manifests as illogical and hilariously stupid outrage on these pages.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
I choose to believe that life should be protected.
Well, until that life actually leaves the womb and tries to enter the U.S. from Central America. You are positively eager to send those young lives back to die. That is blatant hypocrisy, no matter how hard you try to hide from it.
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
Yeah buddy. And all the Libtards bitch about the bombing of civilians by drone and will allow a baby cut up in a womb? really???

The fuck out of here! ----->
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
whole lotta "citation needed" in your senseless ranting up there.

--The pledge of allegiance, as you know it to be, was not established at or anywhere near this country's founding
--putting "god" in our currency was something that happened in the 20th century. I'll let you do the math


--no: this country was not founded on Christian principles.






Whatever the rotting corpse of Brietbart tells you, it does not make it so. Get your head our of your ass, son.

1) http://www.ebay.com/itm/1864-US-Two...58?pt=Coins_US_Individual&hash=item2c8e1ea1a6

2) http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/georgewash440750.html

erm..Well while searching for a Jefferson quote I actually found the definitive gist of "Separation of Church and State"

http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/virginia-statute-religious-freedom

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnadams391045.html

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/n/noahwebste195611.html

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/n/noahwebste195608.html

righhht :rolleyes:


You are batting .050
The pledge was not around at the USA's inception and
because it being so makes it so,not Breitbart saying it. ;)
PS: There's some citations for you. :D
 
Last edited:

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,351
16,727
136
Really? A progresive leaning pile of propaganda trash? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salon_%28website%29

Truth is on all the forums I've been on Libtards have bitched about Bush's "war crimes." :rolleyes: Water boarding anyone?

Bunch of damn circle jerks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_jerk_(sexual_practice)

Lol! Yeah a really progressive site saying dems support drones, who else do you think should be reporting on their own kind? Your original point was bullshit, I called you on your bullshit and then you babbled some nonsense.

Do all righties have mental disorders? His personality reminds me of a cats'. Focused on one subject but easily distracted by anything else like a shadow or a spider on the wall, getting them refocused on the previous object becomes impossible.

Take your meds for christs sake!
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
Dont-mistake-my-kindness-for-weakness.jpg
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,351
16,727
136
It must be quicker to search and find a picture to express your feelings than it is to type them, sad.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Really? A progresive leaning pile of propaganda trash? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salon_%28website%29

Truth is on all the forums I've been on Libtards have bitched about Bush's "war crimes." :rolleyes: Water boarding anyone?

Bunch of damn circle jerks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_jerk_(sexual_practice)

Does Salon use words too big for you to understand?

Since you are the type of poorly educated trash that supports water boarding, I'm sure anything past a 4th grade level is way beyond you.
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
So are you saying you support abortion, but not water boarding? o_O

We don't cut up terrorists that would not hesitate to cut off your head like they do with babies in the womb.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
cut up? what are you talking about, pasty white neo-nazi from Colorado bomb shelter?

your information intrigues me. well...it is funny, to a degree, but it still makes you sound stupid...because you are.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
I'm really amazed how republicans keep getting away with this.
With every election we see republican candidates run on the economy, jobs, national debt.
Then people fall for that line and vote them in.

The next day, the republicans enact their true agenda, attacking social issues.
No word on the economy, national debt, and certainly nothing to create jobs.
Instead, they seek to limit and ban abortion. Attack gay rights. Attack minority rights. Attack voting rights.
That, in a nut shell, is the agenda.
Not the economy, creating jobs, or reducing the debt. Its the social that want to attack.

For republicans, big government means the government protecting and ensuring voting rights, safe abortion when necessary, and ensuring that minorities can take part in the American dream.
That is big government for republicans.
And why they keep saying, big government is bad. And why they want to attack it.

So when any republican candidate runs for governor, or congress, with their number one issue as the economy, or reducing that big government takeover, don't believe it.
Their idea of reducing big government most likely boils down to reducing peoples rights.
Your rights to vote, for equal pay, for freedom to marry, and freedom to seek abortion when the need is urgent.

And to top it off, once that woman gives birth, they want nothing more to do with her or her child.
Let them eat cake.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,351
16,727
136
You're ignorant.



http://www.abortionfacts.com/literature/abortion-as-your-option

NSFW. http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/abortionimages/


But waterboarding is faaaaaar worse! And Bush crimes and Dick Cheney and, and.. :rolleyes:

Lol! And you have the nerve to tell other people they are using biased websites?


And FYI, water boarding is illegal because that's the law, we signed a treaty agreeing to not do that and we expect others to not do that either. Abortion is legal dumbass.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
So are you saying you support abortion, but not water boarding? o_O

We don't cut up terrorists that would not hesitate to cut off your head like they do with fetuses in the womb.

Fixed that for you. Babies are not in wombs, only fetuses. A fetus is not a baby, a baby is not a fetus. Abortion should be legal and safe with easy and free access to birth control and education as well as affordable prenatal care used to reduce the number of necessary abortions.

I will never understand why those who are so adamant against abortion are also adamant against making birth control easily accessable. You want less abortions, make it easier to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Simple as that.
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
Fixed that for you. Babies are not in wombs, only fetuses. A fetus is not a baby, a baby is not a fetus. Abortion should be legal and safe with easy and free access to birth control and education as well as affordable prenatal care used to reduce the number of necessary abortions.

I will never understand why those who are so adamant against abortion are also adamant against making birth control easily accessable. You want less abortions, make it easier to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Simple as that.

It's the simplest solutions that are all too often overlooked.

That and what the pro-lifers really want is less sex....less sex in media, less sex education, etc.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,151
108
106
I will never understand why those who are so adamant against abortion are also adamant against making birth control easily accessable. You want less abortions, make it easier to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Simple as that.

I cannot agree more. Sure, I don't support abortion on moral grounds, however, my wife has been on birth control for the last 2 years because I'd rather prevent pregancies than to entertain terminating one.

To some extreme pro-lifers, I guess birth control is sort of a retroactive abortion and equally wrong. :\
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
It's the simplest solutions that are all too often overlooked.

That and what the pro-lifers really want is less sex....less sex in media, less sex education, etc.

Mostly, they want evil doers to suffer so that they can preach against sin. Suffering sinners are a must if one is to do that, so they want to make sure there are plenty.

They'd find this horrifying, I'm sure, in their abstinence only world-

http://www.vox.com/2014/10/2/689133...free-birth-control-and-they-now-have-very-low

Texas? whole different headset-

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/09/27/2690281/texas-abstinence-website/
 
Last edited:

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,310
687
126
SCOTUS blocked the part of Texas law. While this is not a formal ruling or anything but I think this is like the first pro-choice order Roberts court ever made. If you recall the new Texas law, it had the effect of closing most of abortion clinics (from 40 to 7) by requiring surgical ambulatory equipments that cost upward of 1 million dollars. (Small government FTW)

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...S_TEXAS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT