Ten Companies Paying Americans the Least

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
What have I posted that are you talking about ?
Pretty much everything you've posted. So I take it Microsoft doesn't have your CEO resume? Weaseled out, eh? It's okay, I'm sure some all the other class-envy types have theirs in.



____

And yes, we're all in so much danger of McDonalds, Walmart, Yum Foods, Restaurant chains, and Starbucks outsourcing all of their jobs. You'll have to send away to China if you want a Big Mac. A cup of overpriced coffee will be a trip to Thailand.

Fucking stupid, none of these 10 companies are outsourcing, that's just another idiotic catch-all don't turn your brain on phrase people have latched onto.

Meanwhile, see the Boeing thread if you want to know why companies outsource. Now an 80k a year job with 10k signing bonus and benefits package is something to whine about. People are pissed because the company gets 8.9 billion dollar tax break, because much of the populace has gotten so fucking stupid and serf-minded they'd rather the state have that 8.9 billion to turn into debt, than a company have 8.9 billion that can be used to pay more salaries, create more economic activity, pay off shareholders who otherwise wouldn't invest in the company in the first place, etc. To say nothing of the fact that whatever the company is getting as a 'break' is just part of what they actually PAY in taxes, to say nothing of all the taxes paid by employees who actually have incomes and spend money/pay taxes.

People are just devolving into idiots, and statist-minded serfs.

It's no wonder companies than can do things that can be outsourced (hint to the dumbells, that's probably NOT food services, unless you're sending off to India for a taco) see it as more increasingly a favorable option.

Too few one among our less-skilled, less REAL WORLD educated (bullshit degrees don't count) ever more entitled, more ignorant than ever workforce wants to take responsibility for their own role in reasons for outsourcing. Mainly: many aren't that bright, aren't all that skilled, are fairly lazy, yet think they are God's own gift to every company. They also think everyone else around the world is just an ignorant savage who can't do what they can. Witness the whine of the Boeing ingrate making close to 100k a year + bennies with "No one in some overseas shithole can do what I do!" For anything approaching your salary, even half of it in many parts of the world, a trained chimpanzee will do what you do.

_________

I have a friend who started his own business here in LA ten years ago- since has grown it into a multi-million dollar small business. He saw a need for and invented/manufactures a specific camera-mount setup that studios, sports teams and others needed.

For the past decade China was his best option for getting the parts for his product manufactured, so he was back and forth between LA and Shenzhen every month.

About 6 months ago, he tells me he's tired of all the travel, wants to bring his whole operation to LA- warehouse/factory in the SF Valley. He's in-sourcing, bringing it back home. Doing his part. Plus he was tired of the factories he was dealing with in China- it isn't all a bed of roses doing business there, in fact, it's a MAJOR PITA. (Another thing stupid people that think it's all fun and profit and champagne toasts don't know/understand).

So anyway, I was interested to see what happened with that. I talked to him recently after he's been "back" for about the last 6 months.

He tried hiring people here in LA to make/assemble the same parts China was doing. Every DAY it was one thing after another. First: finding anyone qualified, capable, not a blithering idiot who thinks he/she is God's gift, etc. etc.... mission almost-fucking-impossible. Even in a gutted economy, offering a decent wage, flexible hours, decent conditions, few people actually want a fucking job.

Once he did finally get a staff, Employees not showing up to work, some excuse or other. People just LAZY as all fuck. People who on paper were qualified to run the equipment/assemble things turn out to be retards who can't do JACK SHIT without being supervised constantly. People taking 3 hour lunch breaks, disappearing from their worksite, not meeting deadlines, etc. etc.

Best of all, he's since had to deal with sexual harassment lawsuits. (Two of his warehouse employees harassed a female accountant. Such things are kind of a joke to most people, but try dealing with them (while trying to run the rest of your business) as an employer.

Dealing with the city's red-tape was an absolute nightmare. Pretty much every obstacle that could be placed in his path, was thrown in his path.

End result? You guessed it. He's back in China.

US "workers" who think they are God's gift but really suck in a lot of ways simply can't compete with China, and it's not just about the price of labor (My friend was willing to pay FAR more individually to hire people here, but it actually costs him more money to do business in China because of the travel expenses, the need to hire a larger minimum number of workers there to secure a factory, and the cultural differences and time/shipping delays, etc. It's a major PITA.

But: they actually do the fucking job and deliver the product. His attempt at doing the same with a US workforce was an absolute fucking nightmare in comparison.

So until the US worker collectively shapes the F up- then STFU about outsourcing. Collectively, in many ways too many are unwilling to look inwardly and address: YOU F'ING SUCK. You may think you're God's gift, worth more than workers everywhere else, but newsflash: many aren't. Until people deal with the reality of that, and face the fact that it's not only a free country that people like my friend can move around in wherever they please, it's FREE WORLD that people like my friend can move around in wherever they f'ing please.

Entitled fucking morons just because they are American entitled fucking morons can't force anyone to not go where they can actually get things done, and accept what is for them a better deal. Not individuals, and not entire global companies. And no, all the idiotic threats of storming the treasury and stealing everyone's tax money because idiots think they are entitled to that too isn't going to change that fact either.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Pretty much everything you've posted. So I take it Microsoft doesn't have your CEO resume? Weaseled out, eh? It's okay, I'm sure some all the other class-envy types have theirs in.

Actually nothing I posted. Which is demonstrated by you're inability to point to one thing.

All of this about me applying to be the ceo of Microsoft, starts and ends within the confines of your imagination.

How did I "weasel" out of something that's a complete invention of yours ?
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I never said that bringing back jobs was the entire part of the equation. The removal of 'so called free trade' has been typed by me more times on this forum than you have posts so you can remove the common sense portion of you post. And as for my habits, why yes, I do look for the American Made label. I buy wherever I can. Hell, I even see that Element (IIRC) assembles (it's a start) TV here in the US.

One thing that chaps my ass is the clever labeling that many companies throw on their products. I recently looked for a Made in the USA shower head (didn't find one) and saw the big USA and a flag on the front of the packaging. Upon closer examination, I saw the fine printed words of 'packaged in' above the USA and the flag. That's bullshit. At least assembled means it was put together here (or at least partially).

Makes me wonder if Walmart and other companies are finally starting to see the light in that they are now promoting bringing back manufacturing to the US. I'm sure that they can see the decline in the consumers (who now have shitty jobs) spending power and can see that the ever growing expansion of government tit supported people isn't sustainable. I guess we will see if 'their actions speak as loud as their words'.

Free trade with countries that manipulate their currency or sidestep tariffs with VATs is definitely a problem but we need more pride in our purchasing habits. Nothing would do more good than to have a massive push to buy in America again.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Why do you keep talking about me ? I understand it's a tactic in a discussion if you don't have anything to add to antagonize the person you're talking to, is that the extent of this discussion for you ?

If I say it's possible to change the way ceos are compensated, that is not saying reduce their compensation. Period. Changing could mean increasing their compensation.

OMG. Now you are trying to talk out of both sides of your ass.
 

marvdmartian

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2002
5,444
27
91
Hmmm, and how much experience, education, or training do you need to work at the companies above? Yep, zilch. If you start at the bottom of the ladder, you can't expect to get paid like someone with a PHD......

Not to mention, with the exception of the last 3, the remainder of those companies are all in the type of business that ALL Americans demand the lowest prices from......and you can't keep prices low, and pay high wages.

So is it the fault of the companies, the fault of the employees who aren't willing to better themselves for a better job, or the fault of the "gotta have cheap stuff" Americans? I know, let's just blame the Republicans in P&N!! :rolleyes:
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Free trade with countries that manipulate their currency or sidestep tariffs with VATs is definitely a problem but we need more pride in our purchasing habits. Nothing would do more good than to have a massive push to buy in America again.

:thumbsup:
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
Actually nothing I posted. Which is demonstrated by you're inability to point to one thing.

All of this about me applying to be the ceo of Microsoft, starts and ends within the confines of your imagination.

How did I "weasel" out of something that's a complete invention of yours ?
You can't read and have low comprehension abilities. I said just look at EVERYTHING you posted. That means all of it. Like your silly projections about CEOs buying 20 million dollar lifts, to your assertion that they make too much (like it's your call to determine.) You're the one who brought up Ballmer at MS, that was your big example, I merely provided you with the info that he's out- so it's your ticket IN. After all, you're the authority on what CEO's should make and earn, you know they don't deserve what they get paid- so it's not safe to assume with you making such proclamations that you're therefore able to step in and take over? So then WTF else qualifies you as an expert on CEO compensation if you can't actually step in and do a CEO's job? Why the hell wouldn't you take the chance to prove that?

What the hell else is your claim to knowing what's best for all these companies (vs. the people who actually run them)? If you know what's best for them and all their employees, why the F wouldn't the board hire you? You should be a shoe-in. I say, PUT UP. For once.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
You can't read and have low comprehension abilities. I said just look at EVERYTHING you posted. That means all of it. Like your silly projections about CEOs buying 20 million dollar lifts, to your assertion that they make too much (like it's your call to determine.) You're the one who brought up Ballmer at MS, that was your big example, I merely provided you with the info that he's out- so it's your ticket IN. After all, you're the authority on what CEO's should make and earn, you know they don't deserve what they get paid- so it's not safe to assume with you making such proclamations that you're therefore able to step in and take over? So then WTF else qualifies you as an expert on CEO compensation if you can't actually step in and do a CEO's job? Why the hell wouldn't you take the chance to prove that?

What the hell else is your claim to knowing what's best for all these companies (vs. the people who actually run them)? If you know what's best for them and all their employees, why the F wouldn't the board hire you? You should be a shoe-in. I say, PUT UP. For once.

I made no "assertion" they made too much. btw, you use the word "assertion" because like I said, I NEVER said what you say I said.

All I did, in response to someone else's post, was try to discuss the economic impact of the income being concentrated versus spread around.

Because the implication of the post I was responding to was that because it was $14, it wasn't significant.

My discussing the economic impact of the two alternatives isn't ADVOCATING one outcome over the other.

But because what I actually say doesn't fit your attack agenda, you claim I'm making "assertions", which actually come entirely from you, not me.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I made no "assertion" they made too much. btw, you use the word "assertion" because like I said, I NEVER said what you say I said.

Ya, you did.

Ceos on the other hand are a bit like a club. They hire each other; and they can manipulate their own salaries sometimes, so they are getting more than they should. Sometimes they just inherit their jobs, its not always based on merit.

And we citizens don't have to accept it. Corporations only exist because of the law, and the law belongs to all of us, not people who own or run corporations.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I made no "assertion" they made too much.

Ceos on the other hand are a bit like a club. ....... so they are getting more than they should.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And who said anything about regulating max pay ?

Anyway, its within our power to change the way ceo's are compensated.

2 lies in one thread, or maybe you just have a really shitty memory.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Ya, you did.

That statement is in the context of people who are compensated based on merit.

Saying they are compensated MORE THAN THEY SHOULD, if it was based on merit, isn't saying they are getting compensated more than they should.

If I say the Earth is bigger than Mars, you can't say I'm saying the Earth is the biggest planet and then call me a liar for saying so.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





2 lies in one thread, or maybe you just have a really shitty memory.

No, the problem is you can't read.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
That statement is in the context of people who are compensated based on merit.

Saying they are compensated MORE THAN THEY SHOULD, if it was based on merit, isn't saying they are getting compensated more than they should.

If I say the Earth is bigger than Mars, you can't say I'm saying the Earth is the biggest planet and then call me a liar for saying so.

So again I ask

How much should they make?
How much should I make?

Maybe we should all just send all of our money to the government and let them decide how much we deserve?
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
I made no "assertion" they made too much. btw, you use the word "assertion" because like I said, I NEVER said what you say I said.

Ceos on the other hand are a bit like a club. They hire each other; and they can manipulate their own salaries sometimes, so they are getting more than they should.

Straight up liar.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
That statement is in the context of people who are compensated based on merit.

Saying they are compensated MORE THAN THEY SHOULD, if it was based on merit, isn't saying they are getting compensated more than they should.

If I say the Earth is bigger than Mars, you can't say I'm saying the Earth is the biggest planet and then call me a liar for saying so.

pants-on-fire.jpg
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
So again I ask

How much should they make?
How much should I make?

Maybe we should all just send all of our money to the government and let them decide how much we deserve?

I don't have an opinion how much a ceo should make. I have an opinion about who should decide.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Straight up liar.

No it isn't a lie. It's a statement misread and taken out of context.

I said some entertainers are properly compensated based on merit.

I then said some ceos are compensated more than they should be, if they were compensated based on merit.

By comparison. To the entertainers. That's the entirety of the context of my statement.

That is not saying ceos are compensated too much. In a completely different context. Or if based on merit.

And it has nothing to do with class warfare, something you bring up, something which I don't believe exists to any great degree.
 
Last edited:

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
No it isn't a lie. It's a statement misread and taken out of context.
LOL yeah, whatever. There's no other context- you're typical. You come up with all this nonsense you know nothing about- like being a CEO is just being part of some club- and then use it to make sweeping generalizations that they don't deserve what they're paid. And you actually argued the most ridiculous position that removing the leadership of a company in order to give people a whopping $14 is good economic practice.

You don't believe class-envy exists, because you're the living embodiment of it with brain-dead beliefs like that.

Why is it you're so mad about CEOs getting compensated a share of the billions they generate for various companies (all of it the company's money) while you're probably fine with clueless politicians spending trillions and trillions of public money (IE: YOUR money, not theirs) into a complete blackhole of debt, the bill for which will be sent to you/your kids/thier kids/etc. etc. Because you think that somewhere along the way some one of them will kick some of it to you in the form of some benefit? Did you weigh whatever that "benefit" will actually cost you in the form of lost wages/jobs you'll never have, your nation buried in debt, increased taxes/fees/fines you'll pay, loss of spending power/freedom, etc. etc? I doubt it. You'd rather believe you have some authority to dictate to CEOs anything.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
No it isn't a lie. It's a statement misread and taken out of context.

I said some entertainers are properly compensated based on merit.

I then said some ceos are compensated more than they should be, if they were compensated based on merit.

By comparison. To the entertainers. That's the entirety of the context of my statement.

That is not saying ceos are compensated too much. In a completely different context. Or if based on merit.

And it has nothing to do with class warfare, something you bring up, something which I don't believe exists to any great degree.

I can't decide what's worse, your lie or your explanation of why it's not a lie.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,757
16,102
146
So again I ask

How much should they make?
How much should I make?

Maybe we should all just send all of our money to the government and let them decide how much we deserve?

Well for your second question if you work for a public company, you should make less than you do.

You're nothing more than an expense to your company. Ideally they would offshore your job to India. If that wasn't possible they should look into replacing you with an H1B immigrant. If that doesn't work then they should reduce the amount they contribute to your healthcare, retirement, vacation, etc.

The reality is your company owes its customers and employees nothing. It only owes fiduciary responsibility to its share holders after executive compensation.

Your compensation is a drain on your company.