Temps While Encoding Video?

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
Hi.

I remain paranoid about my thermals, so factor that in. Cause this is my first quad core chip.

I just began a video encoding.....know that I also again, unparked my cores.

Is it normal for my temps to be as high as they are doing this????? I never see them this high!!!!:eek:

Thanks!!!!


1zn7er7.jpg
 
Last edited:

(sic)Klown12

Senior member
Nov 27, 2010
572
0
76
Actually those temps aren't high. Since encoding is very processor intensive you will see it warm you chip up more than day to day applications and games, but you still have plenty of thermal room left.
 

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
Actually those temps aren't high. Since encoding is very processor intensive you will see it warm you chip up more than day to day applications and games, but you still have plenty of thermal room left.

Bless you too for this!:thumbsup:

I know it sounds lame, but I just got tears of relief. I need to stop expecting them to be 27C not only at idle.:\

In my paranoid little brain, I was about to get out the AS5 (I now get there's better stuff I should buy) and take things down and clean my Lynnfield and put new, better paste, cause what Mfgs use is very lame.

I think I should stop running Speed fan every 14 minutes.:sneaky:
 

jkauff

Senior member
Oct 4, 2012
583
13
81
Those numbers are very low if you're doing CPU-only encoding. I have a 3570K overclocked to 4400 at a bit over 1.3v, and I'm happy if the core temps stay in the mid-80s doing a Handbrake encode.
 

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
Those numbers are very low if you're doing CPU-only encoding. I have a 3570K overclocked to 4400 at a bit over 1.3v, and I'm happy if the core temps stay in the mid-80s doing a Handbrake encode.

I am feelin better and better!!! Nothing more important than LEARNING. This place is the ultimate for that re our technology!:wub:

And, if I saw mid 80s while doing ANYTHING, I would go directly to the padded room and fold up into the fetal position in the corner of it.

But maybe I should replace the original paste anyhow.

I hope Santa brings U wutevah U want!!!!!():)

Thanks so much!!!!!
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
You need to bump up your clock speed by at least 400MHz. I run mine up to 80C without so much as blinking. These 45nm beasts run hot.
 

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
You need to bump up your clock speed by at least 400MHz. I run mine up to 80C without so much as blinking. These 45nm beasts run hot.


O! I am afraid to do that!!!

No hitting....I've always felt Intel should be respected in the specifics of their engineering re any given chip, and oveclocking is mean verging on sadistic.

No matter how irrational, it is true.

Were I a chip, I would no way want anyone to overclock me.:| OR, have to endure 80C even briefly!!!

PS: Doesn't Turbo boost kinda up the clock speed when called for all by itself? I kinda assumed it did. Does it? I have it enabled in the bios, after all. So I keep thinking when needed, it will just leap up to 3.4, no?
 
Last edited:

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
K, I just found below on Intel re Turboboost, putting screenie re my chip:

2hykry9.jpg

Doesn't that mean it overclocks itself sometimes when needed, and I don't have to override that and be mean? If not, wut DOES it mean????
 
Last edited:

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
I am waiting excitedly to be educated re the above! Cause, it's important. Re overclocking manually versus simple Turbo boost.
 

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
if you scroll to bottom right in MS Paint you can crop the canvas size so it's not full of white.


Good point, I have bookmarked it in my brain! I crop all the time, I was just remiss earlier. and only focused on isolating the relevant data on Intel re MY CHIP from all the rest.

U must have planets in either Virgo, Libra or both.
 
Last edited:

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
K.....I always try to do everything myself, it empowers in all of life, and U feel less lame depending on others. PLUS, you earn more to contribute to others.

Sooo.....here, below guys, is wut has to be the most fabulous, ultimate, in depth, benchmark/bargraph/colorcode ridden tutorial on Overclocking versus depending on Turboboost!

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/turbo-boost-overclocking,2512-4.html

Bottom line: Turbo helps. But it can never approach actual, manual overclocking.

I feel thrilled that I understand all this now!!!:D

But, I remain adverse to raising clockspeeds manually. Esp given my relatively modest needs in computing.():)
 
Last edited:

Essence_of_War

Platinum Member
Feb 21, 2013
2,650
4
81
Larry, is that because of different thermal-related designs, or because of...variations...in the way temps are reported?
 

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
For most AMD CPUs: 60C = Hot, 72C=Danger
For most INtel CPUs: 80C = Hot, 95C = Danger


SOOO valuable to me to own!!! Thank U.

These, distilled as U offered them, I think, might even do away with my paranoia!!!!!:sneaky::D
 
Last edited:

Virgorising

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2013
4,470
0
0
I love you vigorising.

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!:eek:

The surprise of this, but far more the simple purity of this utterance, NO OVERCLOCKING......I am like frozen in SPACE! But in THE VERY BEST WAY.

I am totally moved, and very, very flattered!!!!

Thank you so much!:biggrin:():):wub:
 

Burpo

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2013
4,223
473
126
Mine hits as high as low 70's during extended rendering via CPU (overclocked from 133bclk to 207 bclk 24 X 7).. nothing to worry about..
 
Last edited: