Since there's no commentary I don't know what the point of the thread is, but I see a few things.
That's because, when I first read the article, I was sucked in to the "outrage." But then, when reading the comments underneath, I saw the other side quite clearly. So I decided to post this w/o any guiding commentary, to let the posters here decide for themselves. I felt we'd see passionate conclusions on
both sides of the issue. I wasn't disappointed.
First, something tragic that no one would have had happen. That's the primary impact on me.
Second, that people cope with stress in ways which attempt to approximate normalcy. That's a natural human reaction and that's what the girl did. There's nothing wrong with that.
Third, that people who have had a loved one who has been injured or killed, especially in such a tragic circumstance are going to be angry and lash out. That's also a natural reaction and to be expected.
Fourth, news agencies will take such a sad tale and blow it up to get play. That's what they do. They take suffering and troll. I do find that repulsive behavior.
Fifth, there are going to be people who will always take up the troll and jump in never considering that they have been played. Well, that's on them.
Other various and sundry things, but these are what I take home from it all.
Well and comprehensively put. :thumbsup:
Like I said, upon first reading of the article, I, too, was sucked into the news troll "outrage." Luckily, I read the appended comments before posting, which helped me see past that.
That girl may be vapid and uncaring, but her tweet does not prove that. Like you said, it looks more like a coping mechanism than anything else.
More and more, gotcha journalism panders to our crudest instincts. The entirely ridiculous, faux controversy over Obama at Mandela's funeral proves this.
In that OT thread, which devolved into a right wing baboon howl of idiot outrage, rudeguy got sucked in but later saw the light and apologized.
sixone never
will. Ugly is as ugly does.
