soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,041
- 136
If it was self defense he can't be held civilly liable. Good for Dunn for sticking to the law. Tell that family to go pound sand.
Still doubling down, I see.
If it was self defense he can't be held civilly liable. Good for Dunn for sticking to the law. Tell that family to go pound sand.
Big deal, his lawyer can move to delay the civil trial until the criminal trial is concluded.
That's one person's story. You have more witnesses that disagree with that story and why Dunn is being charged with second degree murder and has had bail denied.
This. And if proven innocent of criminal proceedings, then this civil suit goes out the door as well.
This. And if proven innocent of criminal proceedings, then this civil suit goes out the door as well.
Umm, did you never hear of a man called OJ Simpson?
Did they ever find the thugs responsible?
? They arrested the savage at his house the next morning.
Murder or self-defense? A jury will have to decide after a 23-year-old single mother was indicted on Tuesday afternoon following a case of road rage.
The incident happened back in September of last year. 23-year-old Crystal Scott fired her weapon at Johnathan Ables after a fender bender off FM 1960. Initially, police believed Scott acted in self-defense but a grand jury decided otherwise.
"Can you imagine a 23-year-old girl working every day and going to college raising a 7-year-old and now faced with murder," said Scott's attorney Letitia Quinones. She also mentioned Scott has been seeking counseling since the whole ordeal and in which she said, Johnathan Ables hit her vehicle from behind.
Like any law-abiding citizen, the single mother pulled over and called police but Quinones explains what happened next: "When Crystal pulled over into that gas station, he jumped out of his vehicle, he charged her vehicle, began beating on her vehicle, started screaming profanities at her and tried to open her door."
In fear of her life, Quinones said Scott, who is licensed to carry, fired her weapon, fatally shooting Ables. At the time, investigators found the 23-year-old acted in self -defense, but after presenting all evidence to a grand jury on Tuesday, the court found otherwise.
"Having a concealed handgun license is not a license to kill and if you believe you have immunity merely because you carry around a little piece of paper in your pocket, you're ultimately going to be called upon to answer for that in a Harris County criminal district courtroom," said Brian Wice, who represents the Ables family.
Wice wouldn't elaborate on what type of evidence was presented before the indictment was handed down, but it was enough to go from finding Scott acting in self-defense to a charge of murder.
I didn't want to create a new thread, so I decided to post this here since Spidey has mentioned Crystal Scott numerous times in order to prove some kind of point.
So, what do you make of this Spidey? Is she being "unfairly railroaded" like you claim Zimmerman and Dunn are, or did she lie? Was this Ables guy a thug in deep cover who had it coming, or was the shooting not justified?
I think she went overboard. Not sure if it's murder, but maybe manslaughter. I'm not sure how the law pertains to this, but the guy was outside her vehicle, was unarmed (I believe), and there was still a door and a window separating them. He wasn't in the process of committing a felony I don't believe, unless trying to open someone's car door (I believe that's supposedly what he did) is considered a felony.
Based on the wording, I bet that someone saw the entire incident and labelled her as the aggressor.
So, does she get the benefit of the doubt your other heroes get?
WTF are you talking about, my heroes?
In this situation there doesn't really seem to be enough evidence to determine what happened.
So, does she get the benefit of the doubt your other heroes get?
