• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Teenager shot dead after playing loud music

Page 183 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
spidey07 said:
I Encourage you and others to review your states self defense laws before laughing. Also before you choose to commit assault.
Click to expand...

So then you agree that your statement about curb stomping a liberal would qualify you making a blanket threat on all liberals and thus any liberal would be justified in shooting you dead should they meet you.

Or I'm just gonna go ahead and say that you're a complete and utter sociopath with no concept of right and wrong.
 
Last edited:
thraashman said:
So then you agree that your statement about curb stomping a liberal would qualify you making a blanket threat on all liberals and thus any liberal would be justified in shooting you dead should the meet you.

Or I'm just gonna go ahead and say that you're a complete and utter sociopath with no concept of right and wrong.
Click to expand...

Done in by the very self defense laws that he loves so dear. Oh the ironing.
 
thraashman said:
So then you agree that your statement about curb stomping a liberal would qualify you making a blanket threat on all liberals and thus any liberal would be justified in shooting you dead should they meet you.

Or I'm just gonna go ahead and say that you're a complete and utter sociopath with no concept of right and wrong.
Click to expand...

Is my threat imminent?
No

Is it credible?
No

Is it capable?
Yes.

Deadly force is not justified. You are missing the biggest piece of imminent and credible. Also remember I never made a direct threat. Even over the intarweb.

All of this is explained in state sanctioned ccdw classes. 2 hours were devoted to the verbal aspect alone.

I suggest you learn your states laws on self defense.
 
Last edited:
spidey07 said:
Is my threat imminent?
No

Is it credible?
No

Is it capable?
Yes.

Deadly force is not justified. You are missing the biggest piece of imminent and credible. Also remember I never made a direct threat. Even over the intarweb.

All of this is explained in state sanctioned ccdw classes. 2 hours were devoted to the verbal aspect alone.

I suggest you learn your states laws on self defense.
Click to expand...

Based on your posting history, I'd say your threat is pretty credible, since you're clearly a psychotic sociopath. It would only then have to pass the 'imminent' test, which could easily be satisfied if someone simply ran into you on the street. "He's coming right for us!"
rightforus.jpg


I imagine you'll look something like this IRL:
zoidbergfuturamagun.gif
 
Brainonska511 said:
Based on your posting history, I'd say your threat is pretty credible, since you're clearly a psychotic sociopath. It would only then have to pass the 'imminent' test, which could easily be satisfied if someone simply ran into you on the street. "He's coming right for us!"
rightforus.jpg


I imagine you'll look something like this IRL:
zoidbergfuturamagun.gif
Click to expand...

If you want to go down that path...

What threat have I ever made to you personally, in person, having the means to carry out that threat via proximity or disparity of force?

See where reasonable person comes into play?

This is all covered in state mandated ccdw classes.
 
I gotta give to spidey for his pretty much unwavering ability to be courteous and respectful even when he says the craziest things and is argued relentlessly for them. Shooting somebody dead for hitting on you is pretty good stuff.
 
Doppel said:
I gotta give to spidey for his pretty much unwavering ability to be courteous and respectful even when he says the craziest things and is argued relentlessly for them. Shooting somebody dead for hitting on you is pretty good stuff.
Click to expand...
Well, if they are butt ugly....
 
Doppel said:
I gotta give to spidey for his pretty much unwavering ability to be courteous and respectful even when he says the craziest things and is argued relentlessly for them. Shooting somebody dead for hitting on you is pretty good stuff.
Click to expand...

That's why I have such a hard time arguing with him. He is polite and courteous while being a pompous ass. And to be fair...He is only exercising his free speech. Even if it offends me to the bone, he is just expressing his feelings.

Can we make this thread about jello now?
 
Yes, spider is sooo respectful.

rudeguy said:
That's why I have such a hard time arguing with him. He is polite and courteous while being a pompous ass. And to be fair...He is only exercising his free speech. Even if it offends me to the bone, he is just expressing his feelings.

Can we make this thread about jello now?
Click to expand...
Jello is the kind of shit people that deserve to be shot both sell and eat. It's just kool-aid for people on weed; those people probably put cough syrup in the grape flavor and call if purple-stickey-wigglers.

If someone offers me Jello they're probably trying to dope me and thus I can stand my ground if I perceive a credible wiggly threat.


amIdoingSPIDEYright ?
 
Last edited:
highland145 said:
Juror said she didn't think it was 1st degree so no conviction. Could they not consider a lesser charge of 2nd?
Click to expand...

They did. The charge of first degree, in the case that just concluded, included lesser included charges of 2nd degree and manslaughter. In other words, the jury could have found Dunn guilty of 2nd degree if they felt 1st was not warranted. However, the jury was split amongst members believing he was guilty of one of the three charges and three jurors who felt he was not guilty of any of the charges.

If all 12 had believed he was guilty of some crime regarding Davis they would have convicted of a lesser charge. Since Florida allows lesser included charges, I think the strategy is always to go in with the highest possible charge and let the jury consider the range of charges. I don't know if that strategy will change in the retrial.
 
So many people tried to compare the facts between the two cases but the only real similarity I see is the DA overcharged again and it cost them the case. I wonder if Corey felt like she had to win big after losing the GZ case. It sounds like if Dunn had been charged with manslaughter or Murder 2, he would be sitting in jail right now like he should be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top