Teenager Charged With Child Pornography

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
A Westmoreland County teenager is accused of distributing child pornography after police say she took sexually explicit pictures of herself and posted them on the Internet.

link
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
ok it was all well and good until i read
she took sexually explicit pictures of herself and posted them on the Internet.

:Q now i have no comment...
 

Nyical

Golden Member
Feb 7, 2003
1,157
0
0
Damn, A child charged with child porn.


At least they caught her before it could go any further, I consider anybody who does child porn the lowest scum on earth.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
This is the part I find truly bizarre.... she's being charged with possession and distribution of child pornography --- for taking explicit pictures of herself?? Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to charge someone with possession of child pornography for having pictures of themselves?

I can understand if some slimy creep took pics of her or something -- then he could be charged with something.... but to charge her with a crime for taking pics of herself? What the heck?? What about looking at herself in the mirror naked -- does that constitute engaging in child porn as well? :confused:
 

Bootprint

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2002
9,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Nyical
Damn, A child charged with child porn.


At least they caught her before it could go any further, I consider anybody who does child porn the lowest scum on earth.

At least she'll grow out of it.
 

Nyical

Golden Member
Feb 7, 2003
1,157
0
0
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: Nyical
Damn, A child charged with child porn.


At least they caught her before it could go any further, I consider anybody who does child porn the lowest scum on earth.

At least she'll grow out of it.


One hopes.

 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
Now, I guess I can't take pictures of my kids and post them on the internet.
 

PowerMacG5

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2002
7,701
0
0
Wow. I don't really think that's child porn. Doesn't child porn mean if you are of age (17-18+) and in possession of pictures younger?
 

Allio

Golden Member
Jul 9, 2002
1,904
28
91
The 'posession' is the weirdest. What if you just took a picture of yourself? What if you looked at yourself in the mirror? :/
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: Marauder911
Wow. I don't really think that's child porn. Doesn't child porn mean if you are of age (17-18+) and in possession of pictures younger?

Something along those lines. There was a case where a 16 year old was dating a 15 year old, at some point she gave him some nude photos, then they broke up; afterwards he distributed copies around campus.

Damn, man, I would at least talk to the girl's parents about it, but charging her with a crime is too harsh.
 

Bootprint

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2002
9,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Nyical
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: Nyical
Damn, A child charged with child porn.


At least they caught her before it could go any further, I consider anybody who does child porn the lowest scum on earth.

At least she'll grow out of it.


One hopes.

I don't think it'll be considered child porn if she does it while over 18.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
And my final stupid question in this thread: is she cute?

Now off to taint other threads with my vapid and useless questioning.