• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Teen Gets 17 Years for Having Oral Sex

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: luv2chill
Originally posted by: NokiaDude
Only two things go in the mouth, Food, Water and maybe some Pussy. 😀
You mean you don't ever brush your teeth? Good luck getting any of #3. 😛

l2c

Hahaha...

I was gonna add tongue to that list, but hey.
 
14 is a bit too young, but I remember I had sex when I was 16 with a 15 year old back in HS. Didn't seem too extreme at the time.
 
Originally posted by: katka
Moonbeam:

Consensual to me means that you did something because you wanted to, you had full "knowledge" of what you were doing. Mentally challenged people might not necessarily qualify. The 14 year old does appear to have been manipulated into doing it. Manipulation is not the same as consensual. This is why there is a law against having sex with any minor. They are easily influenced (manipulated) into doing things, the term consensual is there because they want child abusers to known that just because they talked a child into saying yes, does not mean anything. The child molester as an adult should have know better and it will not be tolerated.


No violence means that he was not held a knife/gun point or beaten. It does not mean that he said okay you can suck it. I love you.
Look up consensual in the dictionary. It means the 14 year old allowed oral sex performed on him. "Full knowledge" has nothing to do with it.

And if the 18 year old was retarded - as the article implys - the 14 year old might have initiated the sexual advances himself.

BUT THIS IS ALL SPECULATION AND COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE REAL ISSUE: If the (retarded) 18 year old guy had oral sex with a 14 year old girl, he would get 1/10th the jail time instead of having it with the "wrong" sex. 😛



 
"Look up consensual in the dictionary."

I did! "knowledge" is implied!😀 I don't have a penis, but if I did and someone had it in their mouth I think that I would say Okay if I didn't know any better.
 
Originally posted by: katka
"Look up consensual in the dictionary."

I did! "knowledge" is implied!😀 I don't have a penis, but if I did and someone had it in their mouth I think that I would say Okay if I didn't know any better.

So you are just plainly wrong. It WAS consensual
In February 2000, after he had turned 18, Limon performed a sex act with another boy, identified only as M.A.R., who was one month shy of his 15th birthday. Initially, their encounter was consensual.



. . . and you are STILL missing the point.
A judge sentenced Limon to 17 years and two months in prison for criminal sodomy, following guidelines in Kansas law. Had Limon or the boy been female, the maximum sentence would have been one year and three months.
 
Originally posted by: katka
The 14 year old does appear to have been manipulated into doing it. Manipulation is not the same as consensual.
I'd be interested to know where you got the idea that the 14 year old was manipulated into doing anything.

l2c

 
Originally posted by: luv2chill
Originally posted by: katka
The 14 year old does appear to have been manipulated into doing it. Manipulation is not the same as consensual.
I'd be interested to know where you got the idea that the 14 year old was manipulated into doing anything.

l2c
From their imagination. 😛

We already KNOW it was consensual.
 
I liked that part too, Luv2. First katka tells me the article didn't say it was consentual and truns around and reads into it that manipulation was involved. Gotta love that manipulation. 😀

The appeal story from the Topeka Capital wag great. Said it all.

It's so profoundly sad to see the homophobia and bigotry we have here on ATOT and think about all the lives that are damaged by such total stupidity. But what can you do. Peoles love their bigotry more than the lives of others. You can't really hate them for it. It would only make you like them. So so so so sad.
 
I do have to say that I agree with Katka on this. When mentally challenged (notice I didn't say retards) people are involved, then there is no such thing as consensual. These people do not have the mental capacity to make choices on their own, that is why they were in a center for mentally disabled youth in the first place.

There is no way of telling, but I can almost guaruntee you that the 14 year old was "influenced" by the 18 year old. I have noticed that with people who are not as mentally sharp, that it is all in how you phrase the question. If you ask a senior citizen who isn't all with it anymore, "Do you want a cookie?", like it is a good thing, then they will probably say yes. But, if you ask "You don't want a cookie do you?", like it is something bad, they will commonly say no.

But on the other hand, the 18 year old not only shouldn't be in jail at all... period. He should be in a special center for mentally disabled people, cared for under close watch, and not given the oppurtunity to do this again. He should not recieve all of the freedoms of a regular citizen (by "law" he is a criminal after all), but he should under no circumstances be put in a regular prison.

The 14 year old might not have known what he was doing, but did you guys ever think of the fact that the 18 year old might not have know what he was doing either?
 
I;m just tempted to ask if you ever think, Metalloid, but I don't like to be harsh. So let me present the case as it should have been tried. Both individuals didn't know what they were doing and should spend the rest of their lives in jail. Jesus Christ. 😀
 
Originally posted by: EngineNr9
Dude. People have sex, get over it. It was consensual. 17yrs in the slammer won't help anybody.

Oh please. People kill people all the time. Capital punishment wont help anybody.
 
poor basards...the gays that is.

I am as far from a "fan" as you can get, but i still feel bad for them. Living your life in prsecution should be thing of the past.
 
Originally posted by: TheEvil1
a lil wait but owell

its a bit much, you can kill someone and get away with less time then that

Maybe the 18 year old should have killed the kid and then they would never know of the sex incident and he would get out of prison sooner. 😉
 
Sorry Metalloid, I didn't know what I was doing. I completely blew it there. Definitley one of my more mentally challenged posts.

I didn't see the part about not going to jail. Thank God you're not as stupid as I thought. 😀
 
LOL!! Actually for a second I thought I was even dumber because I didn't know what the heck your post was supposed to mean.
 
Originally posted by: Aceshigh
Originally posted by: her209
If he's gay, then he should enjoy it in prison.

LOL😀

Whew, nice!

A lot of laws suck.....we choose to live here in America.....deal with the laws of where you are....i mean we can vote to have them changed(or try) but other than that...you can move

 
LOL Just because someone is mentally challenged doesn't mean they're a slobbering idiot - there are varying levels of mental deficiency... we don't know at what age level each is functioning - they could be borderline (i.e. they might seem dumb, but no one would think of them as mentally handicapped per se).

And how does anyone here know that the 14 year old didn't pressure the 18 year old? How do we know the 14 year old has an IQ of say 70, and the 18 year old is only at 50 and he was duped or seduced into doing what he did? We don't. All we do know is that if one of these two had been female, the older person would have had a slap on the wrist, not spending a significant portion of their life in prison... that's really the only point of this whole thread, all the gay bashing and stupid jokes about prison are irrelevant (besides, most "gay" inmates are just gay for the stay, they have hetero relationships outside of prison).

What makes me ill is the discrepancy in the law based on sexual orientation or gender, not the gay aspect.
 
Back
Top