Teen dies after falling over 594 feet waterfall.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

xanis

Lifer
Sep 11, 2005
17,571
8
0
Too bad the Good Lord didn't bless him with basic intelligence or reading comprehension skills.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,897
11,242
126
or webbed feet.

A lot of people don't know how to swim in a current. The fastest way to shore is facing upstream, and towards shore by about 45°. Of course, the best thing is not swimming 150' above a dangerous falls. Shit happens, and it doesn't give you much room for recovery.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
A lot of people don't know how to swim in a current. The fastest way to shore is facing upstream, and towards shore by about 45°. Of course, the best thing is not swimming 150' above a dangerous falls. Shit happens, and it doesn't give you much room for recovery.

That seems wrong unless your implicit goal is to avoid being swept downstream (a goal this poor kid probably should have set for himself). If it doesn't matter how far downstream you move, then the fastest way to the bank would be to swim straight for it.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,897
11,242
126
That seems wrong unless your implicit goal is to avoid being swept downstream (a goal this poor kid probably should have set for himself). If it doesn't matter how far downstream you move, then the fastest way to the bank would be to swim straight for it.

You use the water's force to "squirt" you towards shore. It's also easier to maintain attitude. Facing directly towards shore wastes the water's energy, and you more easily tumble, or end up swimming downstream.

Edit:
and of course it keeps you from going downstream as you said. If you're trying to get to shore, you usually want to get to shore *there*, and not a couple hundred feet downstream. Even without danger being involved, drifting downstream requires you to walk to where you really want to be.
 
Last edited:

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,736
3,454
136
That's probably a good idea. Maybe a sign that says exactly how many people died there along with the number of days since the last death.

Yep, people need to see that the warning is not just for liability. Far too many fake warnings today due to lawyer advice. People are desensitized to warnings because they know that warnings are usually overkill and only to prevent the loss of money if they get sued. This one is for real and a death count with corresponding dates would be very helpful I think.
Warning or not, you couldn't get me into that river if you tried to drag me in with an earth mover.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,897
11,242
126
Not so much a warning(but most will take it as such), as it is a memorial, but this wall is at the bottom of a steep grade in Bloomington MD near the N branch of the Potomac. It where coal/log trucks lost brakes, and didn't make the turn. I had a tense ride coming down that grade. I slept in my van at the top of the mountain, and when I left in the morning, something was wrong with the antilock brakes. Using them would shake the shit out of the van. I descended in first gear, intermittently hitting the brakes on the way down. I made it :^D

ZuRcCWF.jpg
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
Though here is a picture of were he was swimming,

it does look a bit inviting. Seems others may swim here to, looks popular.

2ztcz6x.jpg
 

OlafSicky

Platinum Member
Feb 25, 2011
2,364
0
0
If they installed protective netting over the river this would not have happened. Once again an innocent young person dies because of government incompetence.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,897
11,242
126
If they installed protective netting over the river this would not have happened. Once again an innocent young person dies because of government incompetence.

Sad thing is I bet there's a shockingly large number of people who would think that's a good idea.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,128
781
126
Since we can't ban waterfalls, the only sensible thing to do is blast the river with dynamite till it waterfall is changed to a gentle slope.
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,954
577
126
No doubt the church group or its insurance company will probably have to pay-out like a $10M settlement, for some sort of failure to do some sort of thing that mighta woulda coulda have prevented it. God bless our civil liability/tort system.
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,704
15,101
146
No doubt the church group or its insurance company will probably have to pay-out like a $10M settlement, for some sort of failure to do some sort of thing that mighta woulda coulda have prevented it. God bless our civil liability/tort system.

As well they should. They failed to pray away the guy's stupidity.