Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Narmer's correct.
The article says that Farrakhan thinks he might be Jewish based on some ancient lineage... ok...
My "paranoia of Muslims"?!Originally posted by: Narmer
Considering your paranoia of Muslims, why don't you label him a terrorist and do some research on him, Spy guy? Impress us with your intel skills.
It's not "hot crow," because I still think it's a tenuous stretch, at best. All I wanted to see was Narmer back up his bullsh1t claims for a change.Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Narmer's correct.
The article says that Farrakhan thinks he might be Jewish based on some ancient lineage... ok...
Yeah, I don't have a dog in this fight, but there it is...hot crow for palehorse.
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Narmer's correct.
The article says that Farrakhan thinks he might be Jewish based on some ancient lineage... ok...
Yeah, I don't have a dog in this fight, but there it is...hot crow for palehorse.
Well, it's enough for me to stop laughing at Narmer, and head off to bed instead...Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Narmer's correct.
The article says that Farrakhan thinks he might be Jewish based on some ancient lineage... ok...
Yeah, I don't have a dog in this fight, but there it is...hot crow for palehorse.
Not really. Narmer said Farrakhan is Jewish - the article above says that he thinks he might have a connection through his dad's side, but he doesn't know. Narmer was acting like it is a fact when it is not.
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: feralkid
Narmer's correct.
The article says that Farrakhan thinks he might be Jewish based on some ancient lineage... ok...
Yeah, I don't have a dog in this fight, but there it is...hot crow for palehorse.
Not really. Narmer said Farrakhan is Jewish - the article above says that he thinks he might have a connection through his dad's side, but he doesn't know. Narmer was acting like it is a fact when it is not.
If sounding like an ass was your "job," then you could have left after your first post in the thread!Originally posted by: Narmer
EDIT: My job in this thread is done.
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
If sounding like an ass was your "job," then you could have left after your first post in the thread!Originally posted by: Narmer
EDIT: My job in this thread is done.
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: palehorse74
If sounding like an ass was your "job," then you could have left after your first post in the thread!Originally posted by: Narmer
EDIT: My job in this thread is done.
Apparently he's working some overtime.
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
She has no idea what was going on. Are you going to punish her for something she was entirely unaware of?
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: palehorse74
If sounding like an ass was your "job," then you could have left after your first post in the thread!Originally posted by: Narmer
EDIT: My job in this thread is done.
Apparently he's working some overtime.
Awww, isn't this cute. The little people are just waking up and they're making themselves heard. Here's a![]()
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: palehorse74
If sounding like an ass was your "job," then you could have left after your first post in the thread!Originally posted by: Narmer
EDIT: My job in this thread is done.
Apparently he's working some overtime.
Awww, isn't this cute. The little people are just waking up and they're making themselves heard. Here's a![]()
Going for a promotion I see....
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
She has no idea what was going on. Are you going to punish her for something she was entirely unaware of?
We'll let the judge decide that. It's not my place nor yours to cast judgement on her.
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
She has no idea what was going on. Are you going to punish her for something she was entirely unaware of?
We'll let the judge decide that. It's not my place nor yours to cast judgement on her.
I'm not casting judgement on her at ALL. I'm saying this shouldn't be an issue in the first place.
And IMO - she shouldn't be. God will not punish those who never heard the message of Islam and they have their own judgement. That itself is a huge sign screaming at us "I won't punish those who really don't know"...we should try to emulate God's actions than be obsessed with our desire for punishment.
And as always - if for some (stupid reason might I add) reason she is convicted and found guilty....if she is truly Sorry, there is no reason she should be punished.
It reminds me of a Hadith. I think it was Bukhairi - generally (I don't remember the story anyways but the message is clear) - there was a man, who, committed adultery. He went to the prohet and the prophet asked him if he was sure it happened and he said yes. He asked the man if he was forced to, and he said no. He asked the man if he was intoxicated at the time and he said no. Then he said "hmm...are you gong to accept the punishment?" Anyways apparantly the guy left and he did something like told the authorities and he was killed for what he did. When Prophet Mohammed found out he said, "What a pity...I was so sure he could have repented for his actions"
You have a situation where someone deliberately engaged in a forbidden action that is looked down HEAVILY within Islam...yet the Prophet still thought that forgiveness could easily have been given (something which completly agrees with what the Quran says)
Now look at a situation where the "transgression" is not knowing that a Teddy Bear should not have been named "Mohammed"....
I would completely disagree that "She must pay" in this instance...
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
She has no idea what was going on. Are you going to punish her for something she was entirely unaware of?
We'll let the judge decide that. It's not my place nor yours to cast judgement on her.
I'm not casting judgement on her at ALL. I'm saying this shouldn't be an issue in the first place.
And IMO - she shouldn't be. God will not punish those who never heard the message of Islam and they have their own judgement. That itself is a huge sign screaming at us "I won't punish those who really don't know"...we should try to emulate God's actions than be obsessed with our desire for punishment.
And as always - if for some (stupid reason might I add) reason she is convicted and found guilty....if she is truly Sorry, there is no reason she should be punished.
It reminds me of a Hadith. I think it was Bukhairi - generally (I don't remember the story anyways but the message is clear) - there was a man, who, committed adultery. He went to the prohet and the prophet asked him if he was sure it happened and he said yes. He asked the man if he was forced to, and he said no. He asked the man if he was intoxicated at the time and he said no. Then he said "hmm...are you gong to accept the punishment?" Anyways apparantly the guy left and he did something like told the authorities and he was killed for what he did. When Prophet Mohammed found out he said, "What a pity...I was so sure he could have repented for his actions"
You have a situation where someone deliberately engaged in a forbidden action that is looked down HEAVILY within Islam...yet the Prophet still thought that forgiveness could easily have been given (something which completly agrees with what the Quran says)
Now look at a situation where the "transgression" is not knowing that a Teddy Bear should not have been named "Mohammed"....
I would completely disagree that "She must pay" in this instance...
This has less to do with religion than politics and law and order. She broke a law (allegdly), let the courts decide. End of story.
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: magomago
So let me add commentary that actually reflects the original article. I read it this morning on BBC and thought "you have to be SHITTING ME".
Narmar you are WAY off the mark right here.
First of all - Muhammed is, was, and has always been a very common name. Its popularity is even greater because of Prophet Mohammed who carried the same name. That said we should remember that there are MILLIONS of people named Mohammed, and probably god knows how many that have carried this name. I can say without hesitation that atleast SOME of them had to be unsavory characters - should they have been killed and staked at the post for disrespecting a name which they should have carried on. The name itself, as a name, should hold absolutely NO status as an "honored" name. It is simply a name. That said someone can use the name as a name, or in reference to the prophet which carried that name. Which one do you reallly think applies in this situation?
Furthermore - this teacher had NO idea and was COMPLETELY innocent of anything, assuming anything can be pinned on her. If anything - twenty out of the twenty three children should be punished for collectively VOTING that the bear be given the name. If anything they need to face punishment.
Narmar you should remember God is all forgiving and all merciful. For those who are truly sorry for their actions will always receive the forgiveness of God. Of course if you do wrong over and over...you never really felt sorry.
That said...
we could also wake up and realize that everyone is freaking out that children named a Teddy bear after a name that they all liked.
In any case if the lady gets jail time, I highly suggest her 20 accomplices be tossed in jail as well.
Children are not adults. They should never be charged adult crimes. If the lady broke Sudanese law, she must pay. End of story.
She has no idea what was going on. Are you going to punish her for something she was entirely unaware of?
We'll let the judge decide that. It's not my place nor yours to cast judgement on her.
I'm not casting judgement on her at ALL. I'm saying this shouldn't be an issue in the first place.
And IMO - she shouldn't be. God will not punish those who never heard the message of Islam and they have their own judgement. That itself is a huge sign screaming at us "I won't punish those who really don't know"...we should try to emulate God's actions than be obsessed with our desire for punishment.
And as always - if for some (stupid reason might I add) reason she is convicted and found guilty....if she is truly Sorry, there is no reason she should be punished.
It reminds me of a Hadith. I think it was Bukhairi - generally (I don't remember the story anyways but the message is clear) - there was a man, who, committed adultery. He went to the prohet and the prophet asked him if he was sure it happened and he said yes. He asked the man if he was forced to, and he said no. He asked the man if he was intoxicated at the time and he said no. Then he said "hmm...are you gong to accept the punishment?" Anyways apparantly the guy left and he did something like told the authorities and he was killed for what he did. When Prophet Mohammed found out he said, "What a pity...I was so sure he could have repented for his actions"
You have a situation where someone deliberately engaged in a forbidden action that is looked down HEAVILY within Islam...yet the Prophet still thought that forgiveness could easily have been given (something which completly agrees with what the Quran says)
Now look at a situation where the "transgression" is not knowing that a Teddy Bear should not have been named "Mohammed"....
I would completely disagree that "She must pay" in this instance...
This has less to do with religion than politics and law and order. She broke a law (allegdly), let the courts decide. End of story.
Ill give you that - but even assuming that the law is valid, this is the most ridiculous application of it.
And indeed let the courts decide, but I'm going to root for her vindication. This can be filed under the shelves of stupid cases - such as jailing a reporters for writing an op-ed against the Muhammed cartoons (he had reprinted them so he could refer to them clearly in his editorial talkign about how ridiculous it was).
Originally posted by: Aimster
I'm naming my doll Muhammad in the U.S and nobody is going to give a rat's ass.
So much for your theory on Muslims.
Originally posted by: Narmer
Well, the lawmakers aren't some alien force. They come from within the populations. If that's the kind of laws they want, that's the kind they'll get. Foreigners just need to be careful.
Originally posted by: babylon5
a religion of peace