- Nov 28, 2004
- 13,343
- 1,138
- 126
Originally posted by: caferace
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
We can't just add the pending credits to get a final total because some fast cpus are given a lesser value than claimed.
--Fred
Fred,
The whole point of the challenge is to manage your client so you don't crunch beyond the stated goal. That would *include* any pending WU's. Unfortunately, it makes it a weak thing to use a project like LC for that has this issue. In the future, we should choose obscure projects that don't require a quorum and pick low value (point total) targets.
-jim
Hmmm, I do not like projects that do not require a quorum, because the project's science relies on data that are not "hard" enough. If the processor doesn't crunch accurately enough then quite a few of the results would be less than optimal and the science would become compromised. Therefore I like project with a quorum (preferably of three), and/or replication - the results are more reliable. And - forgive me for saying that - although the race is a lot of fun and very enjoyable, it is the science which is very important. OTOH some projects do - in themselves - not require replication or a quorum because it is very very obvious if the crunching is correct, (RCN for example if I understand it correctly), but those projects are few indeed.