T-REX Soft tissue found

[MrBond]

So... if humans re-introduce T-rex's, we will have to become their predators in order to control them, or else T-rex's (like all other forms of life) will reproduce and spread as far as they can. And I have this feeling that T-rex's and humans won't get along too well.

I don't think the T-Rex could stand up to say, a flight of Apache gunships. Hell, I'd glady go into the Army to learn to fly the Apache to be a t-rex rancher

Of course, worst case scenario is we bring the T-Rex back to life, only to find out it carries some uber-form of salmonilla and causes a massive plague.

 

[Miramonti]

If they can be cloned I expect everyone will want to have one as a pet, singlehandedly rendering the canine watch dog industry obsolete, while sending home burglary levels to alltime lows.

 

[OS]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
How is it possible that the tissues were not lost or petrified after millions of years?

Because the whole idea of "millions" of years is a falicy, but that's a whole nother conversation.

Oh my dear fscking lord.

How can you sleep at night thinking that the universe or even that rock over there is only a couple thousand years old?

It makes my head hurt. There are trees that are alive and over 4,000 years old.

Gah!

lol

Makes sense. Probably some that got started right after the flood.

If;

1) evolution is in fact false and populations/genes are forever unchangeable after creation

and

2) a global flood did in fact happen after creation


Then why are there such things as fresh water fish?

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: jjsole
If they can be cloned I expect everyone will want to have one as a pet, singlehandedly rendering the canine watch dog industry obsolete, while sending home burglary levels to alltime lows.

It will probably take a few years to manipulate their genes and create dwarf versions.

Should probably breed their agressiveness out first, too.

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: OS

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
How is it possible that the tissues were not lost or petrified after millions of years?

Because the whole idea of "millions" of years is a falicy, but that's a whole nother conversation.

Oh my dear fscking lord.

How can you sleep at night thinking that the universe or even that rock over there is only a couple thousand years old?

It makes my head hurt. There are trees that are alive and over 4,000 years old.

Gah!

lol

Makes sense. Probably some that got started right after the flood.

If;

1) evolution is in fact false and populations/genes are forever unchangeable after creation

and

2) a global flood did in fact happen after creation


Then why are there such things as fresh water fish?

Here's a better one..

If there was a global flood.. Where did all the water come from?

Where did it all go?

Space? Wait, no... God?

 

[Feldenak]

Originally posted by: SeminoleMarine
I did not read the whole thing, but I got this off of another forum. The poster seems to think it is a hoax.


>>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dinosaur/blood.html

Methinks MSNBC has been had.

Unless, of course, Prof. Schweitzer has found another amazingly well-preserved T. Rex.<<<

I let my fiancee read the article and she's quite interested (she does DNA extraction/sequencing in a lab here on campus). She also mentioned that Jack Horner isn't just a paleontologist....he's thepalentologist.

 

[cmdrmoocow]

Originally posted by: Eli
Here's a better one..

If there was a global flood.. Where did all the water come from?

Where did it all go?

Space? Wait, no... God?

Icecaps?

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: cmdrmoocow

Originally posted by: Eli
Here's a better one..

If there was a global flood.. Where did all the water come from?

Where did it all go?

Space? Wait, no... God?

Icecaps?

there isn't enough water to cover the globe in the icecaps. hell, if the north icecap melted the sea levels wouldn't even rise at all because that ice's volume is already accounted for (it floats).

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Here's a better one..

If there was a global flood.. Where did all the water come from?

Where did it all go?

Space? Wait, no... God?

[/quote]
Upheaval of the ocean floor due to volcanic activity. Volcanic activity seems to be a favorite tool of God. It saved the Jews.

 

[SP33Demon]

Surprise! Carbon dating is inaccurate just like Scientific American theorized... lol

 

[QuitBanningMe]

If;

1) evolution is in fact false and populations/genes are forever unchangeable after creation

and

2) a global flood did in fact happen after creation


Then why are there such things as fresh water fish?


[/quote]

I didn't say that there was no such thing as evolution however fish can survive great variances in salinity. There are also many species of fish that live in both salt and fresh. Are the genes of people who live at very high altitudes significantly different? Polluted areas?

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Here's a better one..

If there was a global flood.. Where did all the water come from?

Where did it all go?

Space? Wait, no... God?

Upheaval of the ocean floor due to volcanic activity. Volcanic activity seems to be a favorite tool of God. It saved the Jews.
[/quote]Hmm.. I dunno man.

My point is that.. the Earth doesen't gain or lose water. There's a fixed ammount here on the planet.

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: SeminoleMarine
I did not read the whole thing, but I got this off of another forum. The poster seems to think it is a hoax.


>>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dinosaur/blood.html

Methinks MSNBC has been had.

Unless, of course, Prof. Schweitzer has found another amazingly well-preserved T. Rex.<<<

From what I could read, you had a bunch of scientists misrepresenting Schweitzer's work to evidence that dinosaurs aren't millions of years old. It wasn't Schweitzer and Horner that were doing it.