It's ridiculous to think we had anything to do with a chemical attack.
What is entirely feasible is that we'll take advantage of the attack, blame the wrong party, and respond aggressively as an excuse to continue feeding the military industrial complex.
It's ridiculous to think we had anything to do with a chemical attack.
What is entirely feasible is that we'll take advantage of the attack, blame the wrong party, and respond aggressively as an excuse to continue feeding the military industrial complex.
I don't see why it wouldn't be. What's stopping the govt from doing it?
I don't see why it wouldn't be. What's stopping the govt from doing it?
That's the standard we've fallen to for critical thinking skills? How about you at least attempt to pull some evidence out of your ass.
thread is 100% pure tinfoil hat bullshit.
It doesn't really make sense to me why Assad would actually use chemical weapons knowing the likelihood that doing so would cause a large response from the US and other countries...
Had the US wanted to use gas attacks as a reason to attack they had opportunities to do so before now. I think Obama was trying to avoid intervention that he doesn't think he can win.
I think he was right, but now has changed his mind for political reasons and this bombing will be a mistake. Hard to see a good outcome out of this.
Oh I don't know, beside the lose/lose scenario.
Where is the poll option for, "You're retarded."?