Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
I think Crusty's point is that, no matter the source, the article is worthless because of what it is about. Who the fuck cares if someone is crying about the common name of a virus!?!? IT'S NOT NEWS!
i would agree if he had just said "worthless article' but no he had to go and say "Typical Faux news. Worthless article". so he wants to blame fox news on this and stuck his foot in his mouth.
i think its rather funny. but yes its a worthless article
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
I think Crusty's point is that, no matter the source, the article is worthless because of what it is about. Who the fuck cares if someone is crying about the common name of a virus!?!? IT'S NOT NEWS!
i would agree if he had just said "worthless article' but no he had to go and say "Typical Faux news. Worthless article". so he wants to blame fox news on this and stuck his foot in his mouth.
i think its rather funny. but yes its a worthless article
Originally posted by: Crusty
Typical Faux news. Worthless article.
Originally posted by: Crusty
Typical Faux news. Worthless article.
Originally posted by: tk149
3. I don't really understand why Litzman thinks the name "Swine Flu" is insulting. It's insulting pigs? Wouldn't "Mexican Flu" be even more insulting?
Originally posted by: her209
If you catch the swine flu, that means you have come indirectly in contact with swine. Is this what they're mad about?
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: tk149
3. I don't really understand why Litzman thinks the name "Swine Flu" is insulting. It's insulting pigs? Wouldn't "Mexican Flu" be even more insulting?
Both the Jewish and Muslim religions consider pigs to be unclean and unholy (cloven feet and what not) which is why neither eat pork. To call it the "Swine Flu" would probably suggest that any Jewish or Muslim individual that happens to contract that strain of the flu came into contact with pigs and thus did something dirty/sinful...
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Originally posted by: barfo
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Admittance of your fault is not enough, perma ban for Crusty :|
Originally posted by: Crusty
Originally posted by: barfo
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Admittance of your fault is not enough, perma ban for Crusty :|
:laugh:
It's funny how people jump on the bandwagon to go after someone when they themselves have done similar things, I'm sure I'm guilty of it too.
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: tk149
3. I don't really understand why Litzman thinks the name "Swine Flu" is insulting. It's insulting pigs? Wouldn't "Mexican Flu" be even more insulting?
Both the Jewish and Muslim religions consider pigs to be unclean and unholy (cloven feet and what not) which is why neither eat pork. To call it the "Swine Flu" would probably suggest that any Jewish or Muslim individual that happens to contract that strain of the flu came into contact with pigs and thus did something dirty/sinful...
Seems to me they have an education problem rather than a religious problem then.
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Originally posted by: Crono
Originally posted by: Crusty
Originally posted by: barfo
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Admittance of your fault is not enough, perma ban for Crusty :|
:laugh:
It's funny how people jump on the bandwagon to go after someone when they themselves have done similar things, I'm sure I'm guilty of it too.
Burn the witch!
😛
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
You know what happens when you assume? You look like a wise and beautiful woman.
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: Crusty
Wow, that's all I have to say. I assume a linked article to a FOX page is written by Fox and I was wrong, get over it. :disgust:
I hope this isn't the first time you realized that most news outlets like CNN, Fox, MSNBC and so on buy their news stories from the AP? Just like weather, they regurgitate what has already been written.