SUVs and AWD

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Midwayman

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
5,723
325
126
So, what have we concluded:

AWD+snows - best in braking, turning, and acceleartion
2WD+snows - best in braking, turning, and 2nd best acceleration
AWD+all-seasons - worst in braking, turning, and 2nd best acceleration
2WD+all seasons - worst in braking, turning, and acceleration.

FWIW its worth noting the AWD on all seasons braked in a noticeably longer distance than the RWD on all seasons. Different cars, so you attribute some of that to weight, etc. However I bet you you had detailed metrics on turning you'd find the AWD in last place there as well for the same reasons.
 
Last edited:

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,516
1,128
126
I'm with jch on this one. Snows for me every winter, every vehicle. Also means I can have better tires suited for different conditions for summer, off road/mud for the truck and nice wet pavement, low risistance tires for the volt.

we would all be running slicks if so e of your arguments held true, it only rains sometimes, therefor we don't need tread on our tires.
 
Last edited:

Midwayman

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
5,723
325
126
Only problem with videos as proof provided by tirerack would also be a bit... biased. It's not as if Tirerack would stand to gain anything by suggesting people by a second set of rims and a second set of tires. Wait, they would stand to gain a lot as people will be buying more of their products.

A small selection of articles with nothing to sell you that all say the same thing.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/car...testing-showdown-winter-vs-all-season#slide-1

http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/tire-test-all-season-vs-snow-vs-summer.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/winter-tires-vs-all-season-tires

http://jalopnik.com/lets-settle-the-winter-tires-vs-all-wheel-drive-debat-1462180324
 

JCH13

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2010
4,981
66
91
Only problem with videos as proof provided by tirerack would also be a bit... biased. It's not as if Tirerack would stand to gain anything by suggesting people by a second set of rims and a second set of tires. Wait, they would stand to gain a lot as people will be buying more of their products.

I want to see a test with 4 different sets of tires. The highest and lowest rated all season and the highest and lowest rated snow tire. Do legitimate turn test and I would guess that the higher rated all season may be around the same ability as the lowest rated snow, or just marginally worse.

And I don't really have a super strong opinion on the matter, but I am able to sit back and read that different all seasons perform differently for different performance aspects, so it certainly is within reason that the best set of all seasons could be more than adequate for 99.9% of driving conditions. If every all season tire performed the same as the other, there would be no need for spending extra on this or that tire.

If you can find a way in which TireRack has misrepresented, construed, or otherwise corrupted their results then please, by all means, show us. Hell, they don't even put a "Buy your winter tires from us!" link at the bottom of each article. Their conclusions seem very reasonable and un-biased to me, i.e.:

"While all-season tires may provide enough wintertime traction for drivers in areas of the country that only receive occasional light snow, Tire Rack feels there isn't a viable alternative to dedicated winter / snow tires if drivers of all-wheel drive vehicles expect to encounter deep or frequent slush, snow or ice."

To your second point, have you done any research to find such a test? My personal experience with one of the cheapest snow tire I could find for one car, and top-end all-seasons on another car was that the cheaper winter tires were comparable, if not better, in snow than the top-end all-seasons. But that is only one datum.

FWIW its worth noting the AWD on all seasons braked in a noticeably longer distance than the RWD on all seasons. Different cars, so you attribute some of that to weight, etc. However I bet you you had detailed metrics on turning you'd find the AWD in last place there as well for the same reasons.

Since both winter sets were Bridgestone Blizzacks (and probably quite comparable) I would conclude that vehicle mass/cg played a very small part in the results as the winter stopping distances were nearly identical. The all-seasons that were tested were different brands and model families, which is not nearly so comparable.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
FWIW its worth noting the AWD on all seasons braked in a noticeably longer distance than the RWD on all seasons. Different cars, so you attribute some of that to weight, etc. However I bet you you had detailed metrics on turning you'd find the AWD in last place there as well for the same reasons.

Heh. Until you try to accelerate, spin your inside tire, and drive straight no matter where your steering wheel is pointing. :awe:
 

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
To your second point, have you done any research to find such a test? My personal experience with one of the cheapest snow tire I could find for one car, and top-end all-seasons on another car was that the cheaper winter tires were comparable, if not better, in snow than the top-end all-seasons. But that is only one datum.

This what I am getting at. If they were comparable, if not a bit better, than does one really require snows for a 5% improvement? 10%? etc.

Honestly, all I am trying to do is apply logic. One can just say snow tires are better than all seasons. There are different performance ratings within each spectrum of tire that one can simply get by with a very good set of all seasons and get reasonably good performance in all conditions.

Could they see improvement with a good set of snows? Absolutely.

My problem with any specific test is that they are rather generic. And if they're trying to prove a point, they very well may select an all season that is poorly rate in snow/ice and compare it to a highly rated snow tire.

One set of tires I was looking at was some Continental CrossContact LX20 (I believe). They are very highly rated (8.5) in snow driving. So should I spend $800 of my hard earned money to get snow tires (and steelies) that are rated (9+). To me, it's likely to be a marginal improvement. Now if I were to have a poor set of all seasons, the improvement would be greater and potentially worth the investment.

I am not trying to say anyone is wrong. The plain and simple point is that for most, a good set of all seasons is enough for 99% of their driving, and being extremely careful the other 1% may be all they need to do to mitigate risk.

For me, AWD/4WD is required for escaping snow drifts and getting moving up the hill that has those drifts. And I may be wrong, but I don't believe a good 2WD car with snows is going to push through a serious snow drift without getting hung up somewhere. I could be wrong, but my relatively bland highway tires on my silverado have been in use while driving out of my driveway to run to town to get gas to then go and fill up my tractor and blade the driveway. I do not think that the best set of snow tires would've gotten a 2wd truck out the driveway. And chances are, I'll never test this theory. All I know is the 4wd in the truck plus the generic tires it has gets me through, so I stick with that.
 
Last edited:

desy

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2000
5,447
216
106
Truck tires are more aggressively treaded than all season passenger car tires typically
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
This what I am getting at. If they were comparable, if not a bit better, than does one really require snows for a 5% improvement? 10%? etc.

Honestly, all I am trying to do is apply logic. One can just say snow tires are better than all seasons. There are different performance ratings within each spectrum of tire that one can simply get by with a very good set of all seasons and get reasonably good performance in all conditions.

Could they see improvement with a good set of snows? Absolutely.

My problem with any specific test is that they are rather generic. And if they're trying to prove a point, they very well may select an all season that is poorly rate in snow/ice and compare it to a highly rated snow tire.

One set of tires I was looking at was some Continental CrossContact LX20 (I believe). They are very highly rated (8.5) in snow driving. So should I spend $800 of my hard earned money to get snow tires (and steelies) that are rated (9+). To me, it's likely to be a marginal improvement. Now if I were to have a poor set of all seasons, the improvement would be greater and potentially worth the investment.

I am not trying to say anyone is wrong. The plain and simple point is that for most, a good set of all seasons is enough for 99% of their driving, and being extremely careful the other 1% may be all they need to do to mitigate risk.

For me, AWD/4WD is required for escaping snow drifts and getting moving up the hill that has those drifts. And I may be wrong, but I don't believe a good 2WD car with snows is going to push through a serious snow drift without getting hung up somewhere. I could be wrong, but my relatively bland highway tires on my silverado have been in use while driving out of my driveway to run to town to get gas to then go and fill up my tractor and blade the driveway. I do not think that the best set of snow tires would've gotten a 2wd truck out the driveway. And chances are, I'll never test this theory. All I know is the 4wd in the truck plus the generic tires it has gets me through, so I stick with that.

An 8.5 rated all season tire isn't going to be the same as an 8.5 winter tire in snow.

Example:
A General Altimax HP 215/40R17 "grand touring all season" with a treadwear rating of 440 rates 8.9 in "dry traction."

A Kumho Ecsta V710 "racetrack and autocross only" tire with a treadwear rating of 30 rates 9.5 in "dry traction."

8.9 vs 9.5, 0.6 point spread compared to your 8.5 to 9+ (roughly the same). Do you think a grand touring all season tire is going to have almost as good grip as a dedicated race/track-purposed tire? The ratings say they're close!

Tire ratings are meant to compare within the same class, not to compare across multiple classes.
 

JCH13

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2010
4,981
66
91
This what I am getting at. If they were comparable, if not a bit better, than does one really require snows for a 5% improvement? 10%? etc.

Honestly, all I am trying to do is apply logic. One can just say snow tires are better than all seasons. There are different performance ratings within each spectrum of tire that one can simply get by with a very good set of all seasons and get reasonably good performance in all conditions.

Could they see improvement with a good set of snows? Absolutely.

My problem with any specific test is that they are rather generic. And if they're trying to prove a point, they very well may select an all season that is poorly rate in snow/ice and compare it to a highly rated snow tire.

One set of tires I was looking at was some Continental CrossContact LX20 (I believe). They are very highly rated (8.5) in snow driving. So should I spend $800 of my hard earned money to get snow tires (and steelies) that are rated (9+). To me, it's likely to be a marginal improvement. Now if I were to have a poor set of all seasons, the improvement would be greater and potentially worth the investment.

I am not trying to say anyone is wrong. The plain and simple point is that for most, a good set of all seasons is enough for 99% of their driving, and being extremely careful the other 1% may be all they need to do to mitigate risk.

For me, AWD/4WD is required for escaping snow drifts and getting moving up the hill that has those drifts. And I may be wrong, but I don't believe a good 2WD car with snows is going to push through a serious snow drift without getting hung up somewhere. I could be wrong, but my relatively bland highway tires on my silverado have been in use while driving out of my driveway to run to town to get gas to then go and fill up my tractor and blade the driveway. I do not think that the best set of snow tires would've gotten a 2wd truck out the driveway. And chances are, I'll never test this theory. All I know is the 4wd in the truck plus the generic tires it has gets me through, so I stick with that.

So, the all-seasons I referred to were Michelin's of some flavor that were around $230/ea. The snow tires were General Altimax Arctics which were less than $100/ea. So, yeah, you can get a set of all-seasons that do almost as well as bottom-of-the-line winters, for more than twice the price. That $130/tire saved can be used to buy a decent summer tire, and a set of wheels for many cars BRAND NEW is $400-600, and will outlast the car itself. CL routinely has good used wheels for $100-200 a set. The financial argument is limited at best, and is almost entirely offset by the fact that tire wear is now being spread over two sets.

Bear in mind that those ratings are not, strictly speaking, linear or quantitative. TireRack has actual performance tests on many of the tires they carry, I suggest that if you want to compare tires you should use the objective test results and not the subjective users ratings. Users frequently go from bald worn-out tires to brand-new tires and cannot make the comparison back to when the original tire was new and thus are way optimistic on the new tire.

For breaking through snow banks - my 2WD cars do just fine breaking through the plow bank at the end of my driveway (if my driveway hasn't been plowed yet). Never been stuck in my 2WD vehicles, and I'm an alpline skiier that never missed a powder day until I went to college (my home town has a ski area in it). The only hill, to date, that I've not been able to drive up (and only one time at that) was an 18% grade hill, after it had been sleeting all day. So, there are extreme situations where AWD might be needed. However, 2WD with winter tires have worked for me driving to ski areas before roads have been plowed, on snow-and-ice covered switchbacks in Canadian ski areas, and mountain passes in Colorado.

Related - people are posting up about how they "can't imagine that a 2WD car can do X." Please keep your imagination to yourself. It is not objective, it is not factual, it is not even anecdotal. It is not credible in any sense unless you are a chassis/tire expert by profession. If you are considering your imagination as fact your mind is not open to the possibility that you are wrong, and that is always dangerous. I have tried hard to only talk to my personal experience, which is reasonably varied and comprehensive in terms of drive types and tires, and published tests (perhaps of arguable scientific validity). Please do this discussion the courtesy of having something real to backup any statements or points.
 
Last edited:

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,788
5,943
146
The new beetles we are driving are definitely NOT as good as cars we have had previously, for a couple of reasons. It is a poor FWD car, and this too can have a tendency to skew people's perceptions.
Stock wide tires, short wheelbase, and really low ground clearance add up to general skittish performance when compared to our old camry, for example. It too was low, but the narrower tire and longer wheelbase adds to stability in the slick.
For that reason, we kept the Honda Pilot and have a set of steelies with studded snows from CL. I picked them up for 300. They have been on the car maybe 20 days in two years, but this year I will probably leave them on.
My experience has been that narrower, taller tires and longer wheelbase will get you around better, all other things being equal. It is funny that the old beetle which shares only the profile with our new ones will go most anywhere, any time with the right set of wheels/tires. They are a blast in the snow, except for freezing your arse off.
 
Last edited:

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
An 8.5 rated all season tire isn't going to be the same as an 8.5 winter tire in snow.

Example:
A General Altimax HP 215/40R17 "grand touring all season" with a treadwear rating of 440 rates 8.9 in "dry traction."

A Kumho Ecsta V710 "racetrack and autocross only" tire with a treadwear rating of 30 rates 9.5 in "dry traction."

8.9 vs 9.5, 0.6 point spread compared to your 8.5 to 9+ (roughly the same). Do you think a grand touring all season tire is going to have almost as good grip as a dedicated race/track-purposed tire? The ratings say they're close!

Tire ratings are meant to compare within the same class, not to compare across multiple classes.

I'd say that's a fair point.

My only point is that all-seasons do have some purpose on snowy drives. Granted, touring tires have no purpose on a track, so there is plenty of reason to believe that ratings across classes aren't going to be entirely accurate.

So yeah, you're right that an 8.5 in one class of tire vs an 8.9 is basically comparing apples to oranges. The only thing that still stands, at least to me, is not all tires within a given class are equal. Most of the videos plainly say summer/all season/snow. If I buy a higher grade of all season, I am better off than some with an average grade. I am not better off than someone with snows.

And those differences in grade provide a diminishing set of returns for having the second set. But JCH is right that he can buy the best for each class, and have the best performance in each separate condition. MOST people, however, are going to try to find something that doesn't require them to have a garage full of tires.
 

JCH13

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2010
4,981
66
91
I have been parusing TireRack a bit more (because I am looking for winter tires, I'll likely need them soon). I found the following two objective tests that have a lot of objective data on stopping and turning comparing performance winter tires to ultra-high-performance all-seasons. These tires are very comparably priced, at least in the sizes I was looking at.

All-season test results in winter driving:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/chartDisplayWinter.jsp?ttid=177

Sport winter test results in winter driving:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/chartDisplayWinter.jsp?ttid=181

Looking at acceleration times: no all-seasons came close to matching winter tire performance in the 0-12mph test. Averages of 64ft for the all-seasons and 41ft for the winter tires. If we do some pseudo-math and ASSUME that AWD would have doubled the acceleration performance (an anti-conservative assumption) an awd on all-seasons would have done 0-12 in 32ft, vs 41ft. A measurable improvement, but I would say the BEST one could ever expect from AWD. As discussed in my prior post some 2WD+winter combinations can equal or out-perform some AWD+all-season combinations.

Looking at braking: the best all-season barely beat the worst snow tire in 20-0 braking on snow; on average snows stopped in 3/4 the distance of all-seasons. On ice the snow tires stopped in about 2/3 the distance as all-season tires, on average.

Looking at lap times: all of the winter tires turned faster lap times than the all-season tires. Averages of 93s and 119s respectively. Comparing to fast-lap times on Leguna Seca, a 2013 SRT Viper TA turned a 93s lap and a 1982 Z28 Camero did a 225s lap. I picked those examples to show the relative performance difference of using winter tires vs all-seasons in a more tangible form: winters vs all seasons = 2013 SRT viper vs 1982 Z28 Camero (on 2wd/rwd cars anyway).

Overall I would say that the winter tires had very consistent performance across all four brands/models. The all-seasons showed a lot more scatter, even from these name-brand manufacturers. So, the overall conclusion is that if you're picking an all-season you better be REALLY careful about which one you pick, there is a lot of variation in winter performance. The DWS remains a solid choice, if not the best all-season choice, as many ATG'ers can attest.

TL;DR:

Winters offer 3/4 to 2/3 the stopping distance, better turning capacity, and 3/2 the acceleration performance of all-seasons when comparing 2WD to 2WD. AWD+all seasons may remove some or all of the acceleration advantage of 2WD+winters, but only for very good all-seasons and lower-end winters.

Is this clear-cut and reasonable enough for the skeptics out there?
 

Midwayman

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
5,723
325
126
Winters offer 3/4 to 2/3 the stopping distance, better turning capacity, and 3/2 the acceleration performance of all-seasons when comparing 2WD to 2WD. AWD+all seasons may remove some or all of the acceleration advantage of 2WD+winters, but only for very good all-seasons and lower-end winters.

Is this clear-cut and reasonable enough for the skeptics out there?

And those are performance winter tires, not studless ice/snow tires. They're the half-ass summer tire in winter compound category.

Here's the Studdless charts
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/chartDisplayWinter.jsp?ttid=180
 
Last edited:

Spicedaddy

Platinum Member
Apr 18, 2002
2,305
77
91
FWIW, here's the top 5 from the Montreal newspaper's test (La Presse):

1. Nokian Hakka 8 or R2 (we have studless Hakka 8 in Quebec, but it's studded everywhere else. The R2 is studless only.)
2. Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
3. Michelin X-Ice XI3
4. Toyo Observe GSi5
5. Yokohama IceGuard IG52c
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Actually I love the altimax and get them studded they typically rate almost as good as winter tires costing 2X as much as well

http://www.consumersearch.com/snow-tires
http://tires.about.com/od/buyers_guide/tp/The-Top-10-Dedicated-Snow-Tires-For-2013.htm

Studded tires are not legal in all states, so I would be hesitant to suggest them vs. standard winter tire.

For some reason, it seems lost on some folks here that having a 2nd set of tires IS an extra cost, but your tires WILL last longer because you are wearing 2 sets vs. one.

I grabbed a taller-sidewall winter tire + cheap steelie for < fitting a winter to my existing WRX wheels. That not only was cheaper, but much more convenient for swapping (all you do is remove and replace).
 

JCH13

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2010
4,981
66
91
Studded tires are not legal in all states, so I would be hesitant to suggest them vs. standard winter tire.

For some reason, it seems lost on some folks here that having a 2nd set of tires IS an extra cost, but your tires WILL last longer because you are wearing 2 sets vs. one.

I grabbed a taller-sidewall winter tire + cheap steelie for < fitting a winter to my existing WRX wheels. That not only was cheaper, but much more convenient for swapping (all you do is remove and replace).

So much truth here.

Putting x-ice3s on my 18in wheels (215/45-18) would cost 4x182+50+80= $858 shipped, mounted and balanced, versus putting the same model on my 16in winter wheels (215/55-16), 4x128+50+80= $642 shipped, mounted, and balanced. So, the 16in wheels I bought for $150 on CL save me something around $216 every time I buy winter tires, and $80x2 = $160/year in swapping tires between wheels. Though I have yet to buy a new set of snows for my car, starting my 6th winter with my MS3, and still on my second set of used tires!
 

Lean L

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2009
3,685
0
0
You'd be swapping 4 tires, having different tire diameters on the front and back damages the center differential.

Or... you know... just get one tire and have it shaved to the right diameter.

Have you tried to shave a tire lately? The last time I called around about that, the shops thought I was crazy.
 

Wuzup101

Platinum Member
Feb 20, 2002
2,334
37
91
I've had both conti dws all seasons and conti 3d snows on my evo x which has a pretty decent awd system. There is no comparison between the two in actual snow driving. The dws is an excellent all season but doesn't provide the snow traction of snows... And it isn't designed to. If you have to drive in shitty conditions a lot dedicated snows are worth the coin. If you live in the south in an area that doesn't see snow often and has no snow removal equipment or just straight up gets ice get the all seasons and call off on the 1 or 2 snow days you do get. If you are essential personnel and need to get somewhere snows are where it's at on a passenger vehicle. Really aggressive truck all seasons on a pickup or SUV might be suitable (no experience there) but I can assure you those are not standard equipment on most if not all unibody SUVs. With those all you have is increased ground clearance.

The evo is a monster in a snowy open parking lot with snow tires on... Too much fun lol!