Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Hmmmmm, any WMDs yet?
....
How 'bout now?
....
Anything?
....
![]()
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Hmmmmm, any WMDs yet?
....
How 'bout now?
....
Anything?
....
![]()
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Hmmmmm, any WMDs yet?
....
How 'bout now?
....
Anything?
....
![]()
Bahahahaahaa :thumbsup:
The detection system is currently being used in civilian airports throughout the United States to check people, baggage, vehicles and cargo for explosive substances.
Vapor Tracer 2 uses an atmospheric sampling technique that is extremely sensitive and fast.
Soldiers from Troop F, 9th Cavalry Regiment, used the Vapor Tracer 2 earlier in May on a mission to find a suspected cache of explosives.
The Vapor Tracer 2 is now being used at checkpoints around the coalition's central Baghdad "Green Zone."
Elsewhere in Iraq, coalition forces throughout the country are continuing with rebuilding efforts.
In Ramadi, Marines paid Kharma city officials $19,000 in initial payments for projects to improve the city's infrastructure and other programs.
Improvement projects include a $21,500 project to improve electrical power distribution, a $23,500 project to install billboards and flagpoles, and $2,500 to fund clean-up initiatives.
Marines also provided $7,000 in start-up funds for a soccer and handball in Fallujah.
In Baghdad, the 5th Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division , is working to repair faulty sewage facilities in the district of Rashid.
Over the next 12 to 18 months, the team plans to help the people of the district to overhaul the neglected sewage system there.
The plan calls for building new sewer lines to areas that never had service. In these areas, raw sewage currently runs from homes into open canals that pass through the center of town.
According to the news statement, the Coalition Provisional Authority has approved $40 million for the project. Iraqi contractors will do most of the work with oversight from the combat team and an American contractor, the release stated.
In addition, the unit is working on projects to solve the area's lack of trash- collection facilities, and will contract local Iraqi companies to clean manholes, fix broken lines and get substations running at 100 percent capacity.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2004/n06032004_200406032.html[/q
Our taxpayer funds in action. $7,000 in start-up funds for a soccer and hand ball. Could have picked those up for $30 at SportmartMarines also provided $7,000 in start-up funds for a soccer and handball in Fallujah.
A search of the school yielded two 82 mm mortar tubes, a 120 mm mortar tube, two RPG launchers with RPGs, a light anti-tank weapon, several AK-47 assault rifles, 10 hand grenades, 40 60 mm mortar rounds, and 20 120 mm mortar rounds.
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Of course, it is like the premise of removing sadamm in a way, as we will never truly know what we have prevented by being preemptive.. :gift:
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Do you expect them to fight back with rocks?
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Do you expect them to fight back with rocks?
yes. dont you?
hell, i dont want no damn terrist shootin at my boys with no damn guns 'n sh|t!
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Do you expect them to fight back with rocks?
yes. dont you?
hell, i dont want no damn terrist shootin at my boys with no damn guns 'n sh|t!
Then the US shouldn't have sold/given weapons to the Taliban and Saddam in the first place.
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Do you expect them to fight back with rocks?
yes. dont you?
hell, i dont want no damn terrist shootin at my boys with no damn guns 'n sh|t!
Then the US shouldn't have sold/given weapons to the Taliban and Saddam in the first place.
i completely agre. i dont really like the idea of sharing technology or weapons with anyone who isnt a valuable and completely trusted ally. England or Austrialia for example. I'd trust them with with any sort of weapons we give them or any sort of technology we might bequeath to them. However, im a little leery about giving weapons/technology to middle eastern countries knowing their disposition for regime changes.
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Of course, it is like the premise of removing sadamm in a way, as we will never truly know what we have prevented by being preemptive.. :gift:
We know some of what we did not prevent. We didn't prevent an imminent WMD attack. And that was one of the official reasons for going to war when we did. Bush didn't want to wait for the weapons inspectors. He wanted to go in soon because Saddam and his WMDs were a serious threat at that time. Well, it turns out there were no WMDs and there was no way there was going to be an imminent WMD attack.
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Of course, it is like the premise of removing sadamm in a way, as we will never truly know what we have prevented by being preemptive.. :gift:
We know some of what we did not prevent. We didn't prevent an imminent WMD attack. And that was one of the official reasons for going to war when we did. Bush didn't want to wait for the weapons inspectors. He wanted to go in soon because Saddam and his WMDs were a serious threat at that time. Well, it turns out there were no WMDs and there was no way there was going to be an imminent WMD attack.
#1 How do you know We didn't prevent an imminent WMD attack?
#2 "Bush didn't want to wait for the weapons inspectors." How long did we wait?
#3 "Well, it turns out there were no WMDs and there was no way there was going to be an imminent WMD attack." Once again, how do you know there are no WMD? Did saddam tell you this?
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
keep it up though CAD, your one of the few Bush supporters left that still defends him. It's quite funny actually.
Originally posted by: nutxo
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Of course, it is like the premise of removing sadamm in a way, as we will never truly know what we have prevented by being preemptive.. :gift:
We know some of what we did not prevent. We didn't prevent an imminent WMD attack. And that was one of the official reasons for going to war when we did. Bush didn't want to wait for the weapons inspectors. He wanted to go in soon because Saddam and his WMDs were a serious threat at that time. Well, it turns out there were no WMDs and there was no way there was going to be an imminent WMD attack.
#1 How do you know We didn't prevent an imminent WMD attack?
#2 "Bush didn't want to wait for the weapons inspectors." How long did we wait?
#3 "Well, it turns out there were no WMDs and there was no way there was going to be an imminent WMD attack." Once again, how do you know there are no WMD? Did saddam tell you this?
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Then the US shouldn't have sold/given weapons to the Taliban and Saddam in the first place.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
These Militias having all these ordinances is a direct result of Rummy following Chalabi's advice to disband the Iraqi Army. Once they were disbanded there was nobody to guaerd the weapons depots thus giving these Militias access to them.