Supreme Court Looking at Porn again...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: Redhotjrm
Good, start to clean up the internet.
rolleye.gif
You would have been pissed about this two years ago, you hypocrite.

 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
i guess they'll have their resident porn expert clarence thomas atleast. man is also expert at sexual harrassment. how nice.
 

Stark

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
7,735
0
0
About freaking time.

The internet is being destroyed by spammers and porn sites (and popups by the two).

Everyone seems to think that the Internet is the last frontier of freedom and free enterprise, but fail to understand that it was initially created by the Gov't (Pentagon) with US taxpayer money.

Here's a great quote from "Fast Food Nation" which sums up the situation pretty well:
"The twenty-first [century] will no doubt be marked by a struggle to curtail excessive corporate power. The great challenge now facing countries throughout the world is how to find a proper balance between the efficiency and the amorality of the market. Over the past twenty years the United States has swung too far in one direction, weakening the regulations that safeguard workers, consumers, and the environment. An economic system promising freedom has too often become a means of denying it, as the narrow dictates of the market gain precedence over more important democratic values."

That was written about the fast food industry, but I think it speaks equally well the the Internet, the RIAA, and DMCA.
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Redhotjrm
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: Redhotjrm
Good, start to clean up the internet.
rolleye.gif
You would have been pissed about this two years ago, you hypocrite.

Yes, stop living in the past.

You tell him Fausto. Friggin losers on their high horse...
That's actually "high-horse dwelling hypocritical fornicators" in his case. Just to be clear.

 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
So they want to make credit cards required to view porn? Sounds like violation of the 1st ammendment.
Also discriminatory; poor people have a right to look at pr0n too, dammit! :p

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
So they want to make credit cards required to view porn? Sounds like violation of the 1st ammendment.
Also discriminatory; poor people have a right to look at pr0n too, dammit! :p

And people w/bad credit!

:Q








:D
 

Izzo

Senior member
May 30, 2003
714
0
0
Why don't they move all of the porn to its own ".porn" or ".adult" sites? Make it illegal to post porn on .com sites. It sounds dumb at first but I think it would be an improvement. For one, it would be a ton easier to search for porn. :evil:

For two, it wouldn't be a violation of freedom of speech. Afterall, you aren't restricting what they post, you are just making them post in a more appropriate place. Give the owners first crack at moving their sites from .com to .porn.

For three, you wouldn't have to worry about library filters blocking out sites about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

It would be easier to prevent kids looking at porn. Just have the parents put a password on the comp. Kids will just have to be more resourceful and find Playboys and XXX video tapes (edit: or buy their own computer and internet connection). So how many people here think that's a stupid idea?---(now waiting for countless posts slamming this idea.....)
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Originally posted by: 911paramedic
Am I the only one that thinks it is funny having the Bush administration look into porn?

Hopefully they will put it on Kazaa when they are done :D

AUsm
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Regardless of how irritated you guys get while getting IMs and eMail, the real problem is letting CHILDREN get to it. Yes, those IMs and eMails need to stop, but a more serious and pressing priority needs to be looking after our young.
 

neutralizer

Lifer
Oct 4, 2001
11,552
1
0
Originally posted by: Izzo
Why don't they move all of the porn to its own ".porn" or ".adult" sites? Make it illegal to post porn on .com sites. It sounds dumb at first but I think it would be an improvement. For one, it would be a ton easier to search for porn. :evil:

For two, it wouldn't be a violation of freedom of speech. Afterall, you aren't restricting what they post, you are just making them post in a more appropriate place. Give the owners first crack at moving their sites from .com to .porn.

For three, you wouldn't have to worry about library filters blocking out sites about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

It would be easier to prevent kids looking at porn. Just have the parents put a password on the comp. Kids will just have to be more resourceful and find Playboys and XXX video tapes (edit: or buy their own computer and internet connection). So how many people here think that's a stupid idea?---(now waiting for countless posts slamming this idea.....)

WinnAr!
 

pennylane

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2002
6,077
1
0
Originally posted by: neutralizer
Originally posted by: Izzo
Why don't they move all of the porn to its own ".porn" or ".adult" sites? Make it illegal to post porn on .com sites. It sounds dumb at first but I think it would be an improvement. For one, it would be a ton easier to search for porn. :evil:

For two, it wouldn't be a violation of freedom of speech. Afterall, you aren't restricting what they post, you are just making them post in a more appropriate place. Give the owners first crack at moving their sites from .com to .porn.

For three, you wouldn't have to worry about library filters blocking out sites about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

It would be easier to prevent kids looking at porn. Just have the parents put a password on the comp. Kids will just have to be more resourceful and find Playboys and XXX video tapes (edit: or buy their own computer and internet connection). So how many people here think that's a stupid idea?---(now waiting for countless posts slamming this idea.....)

WinnAr!

That idea (at least on first glance) actually sounds good...
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
76
Originally posted by: Ylen13
so let day superme court rules this law is constitutional, all the computer outside usa are not affected by this law. how will that protect children from porn?

It will protect them from American porn, meaning that all they'll be able to look at is that f%$#ed up foreign crap, like Japanese dismemberment hentai and stuff. That way they'll be so scarred by it they'll never look at porn again; 12 years later they'll be on top of a tower with a scope and a rifle because the internet taught them their genitals make them evil, but that's okay because they'll probably be going after people outside an abortion clinic. Nothing more patriotic and pro-life than killing people.

As for the domain thing, I always figured there should be an XXX to go with the WWW. The specifics of the rules would have to be adjusted to prevent the wrong sites from being deemed XXX material and that's something I'm not an expert on, but I think it could be a good idea. Of course Communism is a good idea on paper and we all know how that worked out.
 

Stratum9

Senior member
Apr 13, 2002
602
0
0
I don't get it. They want to use credit cards for adult verification before entering commercial porn sites. But I thought this was already in place, like with AdultCheck and some other verification systems. And the pay sites require a cc to pay the subscription before you can get to the content.

But those don't even work since these pay sites have all these free galleries on places like The Hun as portals to the paying area of the site. And even the frontpage of the pay sites have enough uncensored content for a child to get more of an eyeful than what he needs.

How many here actually pay for their porn or even bother with those age-verification sites? Because there are so many other ways to get your porn fix, I really don't see how the system they are talking about is going to have any effect.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: Izzo
Why don't they move all of the porn to its own ".porn" or ".adult" sites? Make it illegal to post porn on .com sites. It sounds dumb at first but I think it would be an improvement. For one, it would be a ton easier to search for porn. :evil:

For two, it wouldn't be a violation of freedom of speech. Afterall, you aren't restricting what they post, you are just making them post in a more appropriate place. Give the owners first crack at moving their sites from .com to .porn.

For three, you wouldn't have to worry about library filters blocking out sites about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

It would be easier to prevent kids looking at porn. Just have the parents put a password on the comp. Kids will just have to be more resourceful and find Playboys and XXX video tapes (edit: or buy their own computer and internet connection). So how many people here think that's a stupid idea?---(now waiting for countless posts slamming this idea.....)

as long as they include www.republicans.fundamentalists
:p
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
76
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Izzo
Why don't they move all of the porn to its own ".porn" or ".adult" sites? Make it illegal to post porn on .com sites. It sounds dumb at first but I think it would be an improvement. For one, it would be a ton easier to search for porn. :evil:

For two, it wouldn't be a violation of freedom of speech. Afterall, you aren't restricting what they post, you are just making them post in a more appropriate place. Give the owners first crack at moving their sites from .com to .porn.

For three, you wouldn't have to worry about library filters blocking out sites about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

It would be easier to prevent kids looking at porn. Just have the parents put a password on the comp. Kids will just have to be more resourceful and find Playboys and XXX video tapes (edit: or buy their own computer and internet connection). So how many people here think that's a stupid idea?---(now waiting for countless posts slamming this idea.....)

as long as they include www.republicans.fundamentalists
:p

I was actually thinking it would be xxx.republicans.fundamentalists. ;)
 

TheNinja

Lifer
Jan 22, 2003
12,207
1
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Regardless of how irritated you guys get while getting IMs and eMail, the real problem is letting CHILDREN get to it. Yes, those IMs and eMails need to stop, but a more serious and pressing priority needs to be looking after our young.

Agreed. And people need to realize here that the Supreme Court is not trying to take away your porn or infringe on our first amendment rights. It is just trying to protect those that don't want to see it, or those that shouldn't see it (and can't make their own decisions, i.e. kids).