• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Super PI Contest

S

Shenkoa

Golden Member
Test results only posted with a picture showing the results of the 8M calculations. Please list complete system specifications as well. You may only post 1 score for each section (in case you have mutiple rig's)

Well there you have it, the top contenders were not matched.

CPU-Z
Super Pi 1.1
Super Pi SSE 2 Patch
Super Pi SSE 3 Patch
Super Pi Mod 1.4


TOP AMD DUAL CORE (Simultaneous Instances Only)

1. chinkgai: 5m 12s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2894.01 MHz / Ram 1024MB (DC) 263.1 MHz 2-2-2-5 / ????
2. dnavarro: 5m 22s on X2 3800+ Manchester @ 3000.8 MHz / Ram ?#?# (DC) 300 MHz 2-4-3-8 / SSE3 Patched Pi
3. michaelpatrick33: 5m 57s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2750.2 MHz / Ram 2048MB (DC) 1.5-3-2 / SSE3 Patched Pi
4. Duvie: 6m 00s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2640.2 MHz / Ram #?#? (DC) 3.4.4.10 / SSE3 Patched Pi
5. McGeyser: 6m 04s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2607.2 MHz / Ram 2048MB (DC) 2.5-3-2 / SSE3 Patched Pi
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.



TOP AMD SINGLE CORE

1. eva2000: 4m 55s on FX-57 San Diego @ 3120 MHz / Ram 1024 Mb (DC) 240 MHz 2-2-2-5 / SuperPi Mod 1.4
2. GuitarDaddy: 5m 26s on FX-57 San Diego 3700+ @ 2815 MHz / Ram 1024Mb 234.6 Mhz (DC) 234.6 Mhz 2-3-2-7 / SSE3 Patched Pi
3. coomar: 5m 28s on 3000+ Venice @ 2700 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 245.5 MHz 2-2-2-6 / SSE3 Patched Pi
4. rise4310: 5m 42s on 3700+ San Diego @ 2750 MHz / Ram 2048 Mb (DC) 250 MHz 2.5-3-3-8 / SuperPi Mod 1.4
5. MADMAX23: 5m 44s on 3200+ Winchester @ 2628 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 239 MHz 2.5-3-3-7 / SSE2 Patched Pi
6. Shenkoa: 5m 47s on 3200+ Venice & 2620 MHz / Ram 1024 MB (DC) 219 MHz 2.5-3-3 SSE3 Patched Pi
7. biff 24 2000: 5m 49s on 3000+ Winchester @ 2700 MHz / RAM 1024 MB (DC) 245 MHz 2.5-4-4-8 / SSE2 Patched Pi
8. n7: 5m 51s on 3200+ Venice @ 2600 Mhz / Ram 2048Mb (DC) 216 MHz 2.5-3-2-10 / SSE3 Patched Pi
9. RichUK: 5m 58s on 3500+ Winchester @ 2550 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 255 MHz 2.5-4-3-7 / SSE2 Patched Pi
10. BigCoolJesus: 6m 2s on 3500+ Venice @ 2700 MHz / Ram 2048 MB (DC) 200 MHz 3-4-4-8 / SSE3 Patched Pi



TOP INTEL DUAL CORE (Simultaneous Instances Only)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.



TOP INTEL SINGLE CORE

1. Technonut: 4m 53s Pentium 4 640 @ 4453.4 MHz / Ram 1024MB DDR2 (DC) 3-2-2-4 / SSE3 Patched Pi
2. DarkKnight69: 5m 21s Pentium M 730 @ 2640 MHz / Ram 1024MB (DC) 2.5-2-2 / SSE2 Patched Pi
3. Perpetual: 6m 59s Pentium 4 Northwood @ 3450.5 MHz/ Ram 1024MB (DC) 230 MHz 2-2-2-5 / SSE2 Patched Pi
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.








 
well, here is score #1...

The Dothan was too warm to run 225 so I ran it at 220 for the test.

Pentium M 730 @ 220 (2640mhz) with 1.4V
Crucial Ballistix Tracer (Micron 'C') 1:1 @ 2.5-2-2-5 (2.85V)
Asus P4P800-E Deluxe + Asus CT-479

Linky-5:21
 
Thats a good question, but I think clock for clock the Athlon 64 would win in a real world situation but I am not sure.
 
Originally posted by: Shenkoa
Thats a good question, but I think clock for clock the Athlon 64 would win in a real world situation.
Click to expand...



that is why most P-M users run superpi all day!! I am at an all Intel site and I cant get those guys to stop benching 3dmark and superpi 1mb long enough to run an encoding DIVX test, rendering test and about a handful others I asked for....Pretty much their MO!!!!
 
There needs to be somewhere that Intel Pwns!!! 😛

I am just hoping for a good next gen intel. Hopefully this shows some promise, a p-4 at 4 ghz cant run that superpi!
 
5m 52s This calculation was done using the SSE3 version.




I had task manager open to the performance tab. Both cores were a mirror image of each other the entire run, the strange thing is neither core went over 51%. I tried setting the affinity to just 1 core so as to utilize 100% of 1 core, and Super PI froze, with both SP M 1.4 and SSE3 version. I wonder if theSuper PI mods will ever optimize for dual core and 64-bit.

Here is a screen shot of Super PI at 50% load the enitre run. I tried both SP M 1.4 and SSE3. 1.4 was slower than SSE3 for me.
 
My question is why separate dual core from single core???? duh!!! It is not multithreaded so it will make no difference. MHZ wins here plain and simple with a slight edge on similiar speed system going to highest bandwidth/lowest timings.....

The trick will be I can run it at 8mb while I encode a 5min avi clip on TMPGenc to mPeg2 and still only be a bit behind Darkknight69 and his dothan while he does nothing else....That is priceless!!!!
 
Originally posted by: DarkKnight69
can you do it? Not that that would surprise me... >500$ processor vs a 200$ processor!!!
Click to expand...



I could do it with a $365.00 dollar 3800+ X2 on a$80 dollar MSI board with no extra adapter I have to pay for....

Yes very easily....superpi will only take 1 core and tMPGenc by default will take only one unless you turn on multithreaded for it.

So the question is if there was a way (which there isn't so far since I tried) to get 2 instance of superpi to run would I get bonus points for running 2 8mb test simultaneously and still getting about a 5:4x or so??? I mean I would be getting 200% more done at only about 5-7% slower....seems like I would win!!!

just joking but trying to shed light on absolutely no need to separate dual core form single core in this test....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top