• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Super PI Contest

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You are not getting it...I dont care how far you are away from chinkgai as much as why one core got a much different time then the other core...usually they should be pretty close unless you didn't start them realtively close to one another, and even then I wouldn't buy that big of a diff...Look I only get like 2 sec difference between the cores...
 
Dnavarro, it sounds like a scheduling issue with your overclocked FX. One instance is getting a higher amount of the cpu time. For example, if I set one of my Superpi priorities higher than normal while leaving the other normal on my X2 even though I start them at the same time I get a larger disparity in the time it takes to complete each of them. By the way nice overclock! Enjoy the gaming goodness!
 
Duvie, I probably did start them 1 second off from eachother. I have made dual runs of 32m, 8m and 1m that have been spot on. It is possible I started them off, or one CPU had a larger load (I have other applications running) who knows. But it is only two seconds, so I didn't make a big deal about it (the 8m). If you are speaking of the 32m Dual run, I definiteyl started the second later. Probably 7 or 8 seconds later. I had no idea that was what you were speaking of. The 8m runs were at most 1 second apart (started). I just showed the 32m dual run for stability purposes.

D
 
with no stability required amybe we should move this thread to xs 😛

j/k, but kinda skewers the results if that isn't listed in the OP. also should have the cooling listed.
 
Originally posted by: eva2000
eva2000: 4m 55s FX-57 San Diego @ 3120 Mhz / Ram 1024 Mb (DC) 240 Mhz 2-2-2-5 / SuperPi Mod 1.4

13X240HTT 2-2-2-5

Super Pi 8M = 4m 55.531s

Super Pi 32M = 23m 32.797s
Click to expand...

Nice eva2000..... 🙂

Looks like I need to bump it up a notch.... 😉 (Stability tested OC BTW... I just do not like the additional VCore needed for a small jump)


4 min 53 sec


EDIT: 1. Technonut: 4m 53s Pentium 4 640 @ 4453.4 Mhz / Ram 1024MB DDR2 (DC) 3-2-2-4 / SSE3 Patched Pi









 
Shenkoa: If you have a minute, would you update my new time?.....


1. Technonut: 4m 53s Pentium 4 640 @ 4453.4 Mhz / Ram 1024MB DDR2 (DC) 3-2-2-4 / SSE3 Patched Pi


 
Sorry, it take me a while to respond to this thread, been a little busy

6 mins 3 seconds


AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.7GHz (1.72Vcore)
Epox 9NPA+ SLI
2x1GB OCZ ValueSelect RAM @ stock timings (2T) and voltage


I used the SSE3 patched version


 
Originally posted by: dnavarro
Guys, I would post the pics directly in this thread, but they are at 1920x1200. (I have been warnerd not to post large pics before). You should be able to download them from the link however, and view them up close.

System specs:

DFI NF4 Ultra D modded to SLI
Gskill 4400LE @ 300MHz 2-4-3-8 2.9V
X2 3800+ @ 3.0Ghz 1.6V Vapo LS cooled
Dual Raptors RAID 0
PCP&C 510 SLI Power Supply

Also, I am still tweaking this setup and I should have 3.1Gig stable at SuperPi 32m. I'll post my 8m results tonight hopefully 🙂

D

SSE3 8M SuperPi Dual run
SSE3 8M SuperPi
Click to expand...

whao your cpu is HAWT
 
Originally posted by: BigCoolJesus
Sorry, it take me a while to respond to this thread, been a little busy

6 mins 3 seconds


AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.7GHz (1.72Vcore)
Epox 9NPA+ SLI
2x1GB OCZ ValueSelect RAM @ stock timings (2T) and voltage


I used the SSE3 patched version
Click to expand...

can i be added to the list?
 
"SSE3 6min 5sec

A64 3000+ Venice
MSI K8N Neo2 Plat
Patrtiot XBL 1GB kit (1:1, 2.5-3-3-7)
"

I need more info.

CPU Type
CPU Speed
Memory Speed and rather its Single Channel or Dual Channel
Memory Ammount
Memory Timings
What version of PI

I dont want to post half missing info thats all 😉
 
Seems like you get as much P-D info I have gotten trying to get soime encoding benchmarks...I guess this must be proof no one is buying them around these parts.....
 
I just did this for fun becase I had nothing better to do. I did have a screen shot, but when I tried to resize it, it got all distorted.

I got 9m 14.141 sec with my poor old Athlon XP 3200+ and my slow PC2700 memory at 2.5-3-3-7.
 
Originally posted by: Shenkoa
Well????? Uhh??? I dont know where I could fit that. Maybe make an obsolete section ?
Click to expand...

Lol, no, you don't need to do anything. Just thought I would share time I got.
 
Originally posted by: Shenkoa
UPDATED. Wow Jesus them memory settings are really holding your system back.
Click to expand...

Yea, this RAM wont overclock at all (the most i can get out of it is a FSB of 205MHz)

as of right now its running at 193MH (instead of 200), as thats the closest i can get to 200MHz while still keeping my CPU overclock stable


o well 🙁
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top