- Nov 17, 2002
Sorry Cad, I have neither the time nor the interest to play your narcissistic games tonight. I responded to heartsurgeon's moronic troll with an in-kind reply. Sue me. I replied to Zero's empty "Conjecture" post with a sarcastic challenge to explain how it applied to my comments. Too bad, I'm tired of the mindless hit-and-run attacks of the bleating Bushies, and I acknowledged that I did NOT take the high ground by stooping to sarcasm. Your comment about not backing up my assertions is another one of your lies and you know it. While I don't always provide documentation, I do so quite frequently.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Actually it was you who trolled. Your "well-informed" input was a definition of "sheep". Attacking eh? I suppose that's why you changed Hero's name to "Zero"? ...or does that somehow "intelligently support" your position or address the issues raised? You always seem to be clamoring for other's to prove things yet you don't seem to have anything to back up your own assertions.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Thanks Moonie, but I won't claim the high ground. I should have ignored Zero's troll, or at least left out the sarcasm. I'm afraid I've become too frustrated at people who constantly attack others, but are unwilling or unable to intelligently support their positions or address issues raised. They may even start with specific points, but when those points are challenged, they resort to the D's -- Distort, Distract, Dismiss, Deny, Denounce.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Bowfinger, as a completely independent and unbiased observer of your exchange with Galt and Hero I can say categorically and without threat of contridiction by similarly alert minds that you are the one holding the high ground. What you hae basically asked for is a rational discussion. I fear your luck in that regard is similar to your hopes for 'clue', but at least you tried. Perhaps next year, when Hero is is 6th grade, we'll get some answers. And dear John, wasn't it subliminal that got you started?
It's too bad, really. If they are well-informed and have put any real thought into their postions, they're missing a great opportunity to clarify and reinforce them.
Nice try Bow, but you have no place to criticize anyone in this thread about the things you are trying to - You are just as guilty of it in this thread as those you accuse.
Finally, I note for the record, not one of you has replied to any of the issues I raised, so I will criticize others for their failure to support their positions and address the issues. I may stoop to your level at times, but I can and will support what I say, sometimes for many paragraphs (at which point you guys often whine about how it's too much work to read so much, so you'll just ignore it all and continue your uninformed rants and empty attacks.)
There. I feel better. Moving on.