• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sucking funbags on an airplane.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
this is natural. Her rights are protected under the law to feed her baby whenever the baby sees fit. Thats how it should be.
 
HAL9000 said:
It's a bodily fluid, syphoning it off in public is disgusting whether it's piss or milk.

Don't get me wrong, I love a good glass of milk, but if someone was milking their cow on the plane, I'd complain.
Click to expand...

One is waste and is to be discarded, away from people, as it is associated with disease. This is why for millenia, rodents of all types have constructed their fucking tunnels with separate waste rooms to keep that shit away from colonies. no different than humans.

Mammals nurse their young. It is essential and it is natural. It is nutrition. it is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of expelling waste. It is not associated with disease and hence is not absolutely necessary to separate from the rest of the colony.

idiot.
 
zinfamous said:
One is waste and is to be discarded, away from people, as it is associated with disease. This is why for millenia, rodents of all types have constructed their fucking tunnels with separate waste rooms to keep that shit away from colonies. no different than humans.

Mammals nurse their young. It is essential and it is natural. It is nutrition. it is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of expelling waste. It is not associated with disease and hence is not absolutely necessary to separate from the rest of the colony.

idiot.
Click to expand...

All very true.

Semen is also essential for the progression of the species, it is not waste, it is natural material used to pass on ones genes. I don't want to see a guy milking himself on a plane, nor do I want to see a woman being milked.

idiot.
 
zinfamous said:
I was going to explain the difference, but I'll just go with, "You're an idiot, neckbeard."
Click to expand...

:hmm:...

3 Minutes later:

zinfamous said:
One is waste and is to be discarded, away from people, as it is associated with disease. This is why for millenia, rodents of all types have constructed their fucking tunnels with separate waste rooms to keep that shit away from colonies. no different than humans.

Mammals nurse their young. It is essential and it is natural. It is nutrition. it is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of expelling waste. It is not associated with disease and hence is not absolutely necessary to separate from the rest of the colony.

idiot.
Click to expand...

Lol.
 
HAL9000 said:
All very true.

Semen is also essential for the progression of the species, it is not waste, it is natural material used to pass on ones genes. I don't want to see a guy milking himself on a plane, nor do I want to see a woman being milked.

idiot.
Click to expand...

"I have nipples Focker. Can you milk me?"
 
HAL9000 said:
All very true.

Semen is also essential for the progression of the species, it is not waste, it is natural material used to pass on ones genes. I don't want to see a guy milking himself on a plane, nor do I want to see a woman being milked.

idiot.
Click to expand...
You read it here first, folks.

neckbead thinks of semen as essential nutrition.
 
KeithTalent said:
it is public nudity by definition.
Click to expand...
Is it public nudity when a man exposes his nipples in public? Where I live, it's perfectly legal for women to expose their nipples in public; it's not counted as "public nudity" any more than when a man does it. In Arabia, if a woman exposes her face, it's the equivalent of public nudity. So clearly there's not a singular definition that applies everywhere equally. To state that "it is public nudity by definition" is ignoring the fact that the definition of public nudity changes depending on where you are.

Personally, I couldn't care less if a woman breastfeeds anywhere, at any time, regardless of what she looks like. It's our culture that has made breasts taboo, that has sexualized them, that has made them the object of lust. I'm a tit man myself, so I can appreciate that. But I can also appreciate that mammals don't have breasts to titillate (see what I did?); they exist as the method of feeding the young. The only thing perverse here is that we have so perverted the idea of breasts that we think they exist for our sexual gratification and not the feeding of babies, to the point that if we see one being used for its evolutionary purpose we pitch a fit about it. Get over yourselves you prudes.
 
Fausto said:
It's not even a PC thing. If anything, it's the opposite. Breastfeeding has been happening for as long as we've been wandering around the Earth. It's only recently that we collectively got a stick up our collective asses about it.
Click to expand...

Actually just the opposite.

Its only recently we've become so self obsessed to the point where a person thinks its their right to do whatever they please.

I dont want to see you and your boyfriend walking around in assless chaps anymore than I want to see an attractive lady breastfeeding.
 
hal proves hes a wackjob yet again.

its friggin breastfeeding, and it doesnt sound like any passengers had complained and it wasnt an issue will the flight attendent made it one.
 
I'm done with this thread, I do not want my wagon hitched to HAL. No offense man.

KT
 
Last edited:
DivideBYZero said:
You don't need to get your wang out in public. Women need to get a tit out to feed a baby. Big difference.

NEWSFLASH: Tits are primarily for feeding babies, not pearl necklaces and tit-wanks.
Click to expand...

yes and no, tits serve another purpose apart from feeding.

once upon a time our ancestors did it like they do on the discovery channel, males were sexually aroused by asses (which we still are). The paper bag had yet to be invented so it was rather hard to ignore turn offs, thus it would be beneficial that the area adjacent to the funzone and in our LoS would be an incentive to hit it and hit it good rather than a disincentive.

at some point we switched to frontsies, maybe with homo erectus (teehee, always gets me) but I don't remember the specifics, therein lies the reason behind the shape of the human breasts:
they resemble the human ass so the sight of them would result in a stiffy and (from a biological perspective, not my own) hopefully conception.
 
The solution here is for someone to pull out a camera and start snapping pictures. If it's all beautiful and natural and whatnot, then the person should have no problems with it.

Personally, I think it's fine as long as the person is being somewhat discrete. My wife used to nurse with this cloth covering doo hickey but even under there, she wasn't popping her whole breast out.
 
Zargon said:
hal proves hes a wackjob yet again.

its friggin breastfeeding, and it doesnt sound like any passengers had complained and it wasnt an issue will the flight attendent made it one.
Click to expand...

So because no passengers complained and only the flight attendant did, it's OK?

KeithTalent said:
I'm done with this thread, I do not want my wagon hitched to HAL. No offense man.

KT
Click to expand...

I'll be honest with you... Some offence taken :'(
 
Zargon said:
hal proves hes a wackjob yet again.
Click to expand...

Not a wackjob so much as Hal taking his usual contrarian position. Let's see, the majority of people say breastfeeding is ok in public. Hal: ewww yucky. Majority of people say grass is green. Hal: it's brown. Etc. Etc. I thought this was common knowledge by now.

You don't get to his post count by agreeing on... anything.
 
Broheim said:
yes and no, tits serve another purpose apart from feeding.

once upon a time our ancestors did it like they do on the discovery channel, males were sexually aroused by asses (which we still are). The paper bag had yet to be invented so it was rather hard to ignore turn offs, thus it would be beneficial that the area adjacent to the funzone and in our LoS would be an incentive to hit it and hit it good rather than a disincentive.

at some point we switched to frontsies, maybe with homo erectus (teehee, always gets me) but I don't remember the specifics, therein lies the reason behind the shape of the human breasts:
they resemble the human ass so the sight of them would result in a stiffy and (from a biological perspective, not my own) hopefully conception.
Click to expand...


that which is hidden, is most appealing. if women walked around naked all the time, im sure the appeal for boobies and asus would not be so much a big deal.
 
HAL9000 said:
:hmm:...

3 Minutes later:



Lol.
Click to expand...

that was a response to your idiotic explanation of an idiotic comparison.

and now you're trying to say that masturbating is the same as nursing?

wtf. you need more school, or less--not sure which is failing you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top