• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Successful people, vs. Failures

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Take the guy #1, who walks into the interview. He eyeballs well, meaning, he's got the look, he's got the dress and he can talk the talk. He passes all the pre-flight, infact, he aces it. The guy is the A-1, totally qualified, will make us proud, etc. 🙂 He's hired.
Wrong! We give him his job, give him instructions, set him in flight, and he not only flounders, but he crashes and burns. Now, despite all his promising attributes, after a mere 30 days, he is our worst disappointment. 🙁

Guy number 1 sounds like a useless manager who just happens to know all the big buzz words
 
Originally posted by: skace
Guy #1 is just a good bullsh!tter. Since I've been working, I've met several bullsh!tters. Usually, these people are pretty nice and sound like they know what they are doing. But they can also be extremely annoying to talk to if you actually know the subject they are referring to because there is a really good chance something they say on every subject is completely wrong.

I know exactly what you're talking about
 
The people with exterior "polish" are usually the ambitious climb-the-ladder pretenders Even if they advance, ultimately they get outed for their incompetence and downright stupidity regarding simple business matters that even a kid could get right.

The ones that work hard and care about the business and have the business smarts usually don't care about making an "exterior impression" as they care about doing good work than impressing someone. Depending on the company or dept., it may take them longer to advance, but ultimately reach MUCH greater heights.


<-----Based on experience at consulting companies and Cisco Systems.
 
Originally posted by: skace
Guy #1 is just a good bullsh!tter. Since I've been working, I've met several bullsh!tters. Usually, these people are pretty nice and sound like they know what they are doing.

But they can also be extremely annoying to talk to if you actually know the subject they are referring to because there is a really good chance something they say on every subject is completely wrong.

Gotta love how management cozies up to the bullsh!tters like they are the goose that laid the golden egg while ignoring the ugly duckling that saves their hide.

Inept management ability.

They fail to see their own failing yet complain about others failings.
 
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
So, what the heck is the difference between the two? Is there a moral to this story? :frown:😕

The problem is that your selection process places WAY too much emphasis on the interview, when studies and studies have shown that the interview is one of the lowest predictor of job performance.

Or your other selection processes aren't assessing the necessary skills/attributes/knowledge, etc that are really required for the job. Sounds like you all may need to do a job analysis and really figure out what the true criterions are.
 
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

 
Originally posted by: serialkiller
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

LOL...yeah, those of us with business degrees are worthless sacks of sh!t. Let me guess, you are/were an engineering major.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: serialkiller
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

LOL...yeah, those of us with business degrees are worthless sacks of sh!t. Let me guess, you are/were an engineering major.

he never said you were worthless sacks of sh!t... he just spoke the truth.
 
Originally posted by: mitmot
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: serialkiller
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

LOL...yeah, those of us with business degrees are worthless sacks of sh!t. Let me guess, you are/were an engineering major.

he never said you were worthless sacks of sh!t... he just spoke the truth.

The same can be said for any major. "they trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk". Sounds to me like the stereotypical engineer "God complex".
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: mitmot
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: serialkiller
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

LOL...yeah, those of us with business degrees are worthless sacks of sh!t. Let me guess, you are/were an engineering major.

he never said you were worthless sacks of sh!t... he just spoke the truth.

The same can be said for any major. "they trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk". Sounds to me like the stereotypical engineer "God complex".

I don't think you can apply that to any major. I'd like to see you try in say.. child development or something.
 
Does he still come in late?
😀

While I've not missed a meeting through my own actions (other meetings taking precedent do not count), I've been very hard pressed to come in the office at a single precise time. But I will always stay later if there is a need.
 
Originally posted by: mitmot
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: mitmot
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: serialkiller
Easy... guy#1 is a business major (he has been professionaly trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk through his school)... guy#2 is an hard working individual that probably has a good concept of how much $1 is worth.

LOL...yeah, those of us with business degrees are worthless sacks of sh!t. Let me guess, you are/were an engineering major.

he never said you were worthless sacks of sh!t... he just spoke the truth.

The same can be said for any major. "they trained to talk the talk and maybe walk the walk". Sounds to me like the stereotypical engineer "God complex".

I don't think you can apply that to any major. I'd like to see you try in say.. child development or something.

why not? how are paper MCSE's any different from what was described in the OP? i remember i was interviewing a college senior Info Systems major and i asked him what a relational database was and he didn't have a clue.
 
Some people are all talk. They can BS their way into anything, and unfortunately that's why douchebag managers exist.

I think the quality of a person can be broken down into two parts: Street smarts and book smarts. The people with street smarts can handle situations better than book smart people, because they're comfortable talking to people, and can read the body language of others and adjust what and how theyr'e going to say things. Strictly book smart people can be unsocialable, but know how to do the job. They can take orders well but may not be able to provide valuable input because of their fear of rejection.

In conclusion, i think that the very sucessful people in this world have a great mixture of both kinds of intelligence. THey can talk their way into a situation, and when something needs to be done they do it correctly. I strive to be one of these people, although I can admit my sales ability is still in its infant stages. With enough determination, anyone can excel in both areas of "smarts".
 
when they formed Seal Team 6, they chose all the guys that barely made it into the Seals, all the guys that struggled at the back of the pack, because they didn't want guys who were used to having it easy. They wanted guys who were used to struggling but still succeeding.

 
Originally posted by: yobarman
Some people are all talk. They can BS their way into anything, and unfortunately that's why douchebag managers exist.

I think the quality of a person can be broken down into two parts: Street smarts and book smarts. The people with street smarts can handle situations better than book smart people, because they're comfortable talking to people, and can read the body language of others and adjust what and how theyr'e going to say things. Strictly book smart people can be unsocialable, but know how to do the job. They can take orders well but may not be able to provide valuable input because of their fear of rejection.

In conclusion, i think that the very sucessful people in this world have a great mixture of both kinds of intelligence. THey can talk their way into a situation, and when something needs to be done they do it correctly. I strive to be one of these people, although I can admit my sales ability is still in its infant stages. With enough determination, anyone can excel in both areas of "smarts".

Most of the people who can BS to get a job and keep the job tend to BS their way to management. Sucks, but it is the truth.
 
I've heard it said, don't remember exactly where, that most often the people who are most suited to lead and excel are often those who have the least desire to do so. Those who are most well suited to follow often think they should lead. I see this addage prove itself true time and time again in the business world.
 
Desire is definitely an attribute, which reminds me. Most of the attributes of successful people, believe it or not, are not skills. It is mostly attitude driven.

I believe committment to one's purpose has huge bearing on success. The best one I've heard that made sense to me, was something written by a man named Albert Gray. He was managing some life insurance agents, and finally summed up the common denominator of success.

He said: Successful people have formed the habit of doing the things that failures don't like to do. I'm sure that's too simple, but it makes me think about all the bad habits I may have formed over the years.
 
Back
Top