Train
Lifer
funny, coming from an "ELITE Member"!Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Crimson
Being smarter entitles them to that.
Correction: Being an Elitist entitles them to that.
funny, coming from an "ELITE Member"!Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Crimson
Being smarter entitles them to that.
Correction: Being an Elitist entitles them to that.
Originally posted by: Train
thats basically what i said, thanks for the paraphrase though.Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Nope he's suggesting that unions artificially restrict labour supply and therefore increase the marginal value of each employee who is under the union umbrella.Originally posted by: Train
Its not the education that makes the college educated man more "valuable" than the union man. I believe alchemize was referring to how the union mans wage is higher because its kept artificially higher by the unions, not his actual value.
It's a case of labour applying the same sort of market-distorting tactics that monopoly suppliers have available to them.
The labour still trades at its marginal value; the value is just inflated by a market manipulation.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Umm, raised as in 'provided for', financial package?
You damn communist![]()
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Ofcourse your BS is inherently flawed and contradicting. You start out with the state raising people - which would be part of the "collective". But then again - I don't think I've ever accused you of posting honestly.
Anyway, your all/none spew is funny but doesn't defend your precious socialism.
CkG
Holy crap! We agreed about something!
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
I'm sure it isn't the only thing there Canuck:beer:
CkG
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Crimson
Being smarter entitles them to that.
Correction: Being an Elitist entitles them to that.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Who says they are smarter? I've worked in both sectors and I can honestly say the the ratio of dumb asses to smart individuals is about the same. Hell after I decided to go back to school after 10 years as a Carpenter I found College simple. All you had to do was pay attention, take good notes and study. I did observe that many more people in the White Collar sector seemed to be more disillusioned with their jobs than those I encountered working in the trades.Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: alchemize
More reasons labor unions are a "good thing":
- The work gets "smoothed out". You don't have to worry about any "stars" working harder than all the rest hurting everyone's feelings!
- We save money on education. After all, what is the point in getting a college degree if it takes you 10 years to match a union workers pay - and you never match their benefits?
- Speaking of education, where else can we employ our graduates of our rapidly declining school system?
- Keeps the sign industry strong with those picket lines!
- You can continue to have great Soprano's episodes of the mob sitting around in lawn chairs at a work site. (hey, what is that guy's head doing in Sal's lap?)
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
Being smarter entitles them to that.
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: Dissipate
There is nothing wrong with workers banding together voluntarily to bargain with their employers. However, when unions start using government force to get what they want, that's where the problems begin.
Agreed.
Originally posted by: rextilleon
Yeah--thats like GWB getting into Yale and Harvard based on legacy and getting into the Air National Guard based on connections. It happens every day. I never hear the right wing complaining about Rich Man's Welfare--Nepotism etc.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: alchemize
More reasons labor unions are a "good thing":
- The work gets "smoothed out". You don't have to worry about any "stars" working harder than all the rest hurting everyone's feelings!
- We save money on education. After all, what is the point in getting a college degree if it takes you 10 years to match a union workers pay - and you never match their benefits?
- Speaking of education, where else can we employ our graduates of our rapidly declining school system?
- Keeps the sign industry strong with those picket lines!
- You can continue to have great Soprano's episodes of the mob sitting around in lawn chairs at a work site. (hey, what is that guy's head doing in Sal's lap?)
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: alchemize
More reasons labor unions are a "good thing":
- The work gets "smoothed out". You don't have to worry about any "stars" working harder than all the rest hurting everyone's feelings!
- We save money on education. After all, what is the point in getting a college degree if it takes you 10 years to match a union workers pay - and you never match their benefits?
- Speaking of education, where else can we employ our graduates of our rapidly declining school system?
- Keeps the sign industry strong with those picket lines!
- You can continue to have great Soprano's episodes of the mob sitting around in lawn chairs at a work site. (hey, what is that guy's head doing in Sal's lap?)
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
Being smarter entitles them to that.
3Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Who says they are smarter? I've worked in both sectors and I can honestly say the the ratio of dumb asses to smart individuals is about the same. Hell after I decided to go back to school after 10 years as a Carpenter I found College simple. All you had to do was pay attention, take good notes and study. I did observe that many more people in the White Collar sector seemed to be more disillusioned with their jobs than those I encountered working in the trades.Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: alchemize
More reasons labor unions are a "good thing":
- The work gets "smoothed out". You don't have to worry about any "stars" working harder than all the rest hurting everyone's feelings!
- We save money on education. After all, what is the point in getting a college degree if it takes you 10 years to match a union workers pay - and you never match their benefits?
- Speaking of education, where else can we employ our graduates of our rapidly declining school system?
- Keeps the sign industry strong with those picket lines!
- You can continue to have great Soprano's episodes of the mob sitting around in lawn chairs at a work site. (hey, what is that guy's head doing in Sal's lap?)
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
Being smarter entitles them to that.
They're smarter becaues they get paid to 'pencil push' while you have to bang a hammer all day to get paid.
pushing a pencil (or in my case a keyboard) Isn't honest work?Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Your education gives you more specialized skills, it doesn't make you smarter. Can you overhaul an engine, build a house, machine a part, etc? Some people just don't like to sit at a desk pushing a pencil, they prefer good honest work.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Your education gives you more specialized skills, it doesn't make you smarter. Can you overhaul an engine, build a house, machine a part, etc? Some people just don't like to sit at a desk pushing a pencil, they prefer good honest work.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: alchemize
More reasons labor unions are a "good thing":
- The work gets "smoothed out". You don't have to worry about any "stars" working harder than all the rest hurting everyone's feelings!
- We save money on education. After all, what is the point in getting a college degree if it takes you 10 years to match a union workers pay - and you never match their benefits?
- Speaking of education, where else can we employ our graduates of our rapidly declining school system?
- Keeps the sign industry strong with those picket lines!
- You can continue to have great Soprano's episodes of the mob sitting around in lawn chairs at a work site. (hey, what is that guy's head doing in Sal's lap?)
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
You could just as easily turn that around and ask you, "So you believe because somebody went to an Apprentice School to become some beer-drinking, slack-jawed, Blue-collar Redneck they automatically deserve to make more money that a Computer Science Major who had to study hard through 4 years of advanced math and algorithm design to become a System Architect? What entitles them to that?"
Both extremes are short-sighted and rather demeaning, don't you think. The job market is controlled by supply and demand. If what your Journeyman does is such a necessary and special talent, then he would be paid accordingly for his work, as he could not be easily replaced. We've seen a turn around in the IT industry in the last few years where "pencil pushing suckass Yuppies" have been in high abundance and low demand, hence the massive lay-offs and low pay.
There is nothing wrong with this system. It is very "natural" and self-balancing. What is unnatural are arbitrary restriction on who can work and for how much, based on little more than union demands.
Are you implying that those with professional jobs, who may have acheived them through rigorous study and course work, arent capable of "good, honst work?" If so, that's one of the more assinine, arrogant statements I've seen posted here. I leave this office more physically and mentally exhausted each day then I *ever* did digging foundation footers with a shovel during the summer with my dad's construction crew.
I'm not sure who is trying to convince you that you are dumber than anyone here, but I assure you it's not me.Originally posted by: 1EZduzit]
I'm now a farmer and I'd be very surprised if one of you can manage a farm. Does that make me smarter then you? Of course not. Neither does having a job pushing a pencil automatically make that person smarter then an electrican or a carpenter. If you think it does, then your just being arrogant. As I said, it is a different skill set. It doesn't automatically mean that I'm not intelligent enough to learn it. My oldest daughter has her Master's and is teaching at a University. I, however am only high school educated.
WTF? I have an attitude problem? If you had bothered to read my post, you would have realized that I was responding to Red Dawn's comment where he declared all college-educated individuals to be [/i]"pencil pushing suckass Yuppies"[/i], and my post was in mock of his by turning it around and insulting all non-college-educated individuals. I even said I was doing as much in my first line - "You could just as easily turn that around and ask you.." And you have the nerve to accuse me of lacking in reading comprehension? I even declare my claim to be demeaning in the very next line. (see below) In short, you seem to be the one who has missed the point entirely and overreacted to an innocent comment.You could just as easily turn that around and ask you, "So you believe because somebody went to an Apprentice School to become some beer-drinking, slack-jawed, Blue-collar Redneck they automatically deserve to make more money that a Computer Science Major who had to study hard through 4 years of advanced math and algorithm design to become a System Architect? What entitles them to that?"
cKGunslinger You definetly have an attitude problem.
I'd be willing to bet my son is just as intelligent as you are. He is sitting just across from me studying programing. He is a brain in math. He went to college for one year and aced all his courses, but quit last spring because he feels he can learn it on his own. He said he wasn't really learning anything that he didn't already know. I've tried to tell him that if he doesn't have a degree he more then likey won't get paid enough for his knowledge. He just doesn't seem to care about money and never has. He is a nerd's nerd and has spent almost all of his spare time on a computer since I got one for him back in the fall of '93 when he was 9 years old. The only other thing that got him going was Hockey and he still goes to the rink in the winter to skate and play with the boys.
Nope, doesn't mean that at all. But then again I have never said or indicated that it did. Why do you assume I have?Both extremes are short-sighted and rather demeaning, don't you think. The job market is controlled by supply and demand. If what your Journeyman does is such a necessary and special talent, then he would be paid accordingly for his work, as he could not be easily replaced. We've seen a turn around in the IT industry in the last few years where "pencil pushing suckass Yuppies" have been in high abundance and low demand, hence the massive lay-offs and low pay.
I have a friend who went to 4 years of college and was an Electrical Engineer. He didn't like working for a big company and he didn't like California. He came back to our home town and is an Electircal contractor. I'll bet he deoesn't even make 1/3 of what you make. His father is now retired and he was the town Doctor. I'd say he's a very intelligent man, but the skill set he is practicing just doesn't pay as well as yours. It doesn't mean he is not every bit as smart as you are, now does it?
There is nothing wrong with this system. It is very "natural" and self-balancing. What is unnatural are arbitrary restriction on who can work and for how much, based on little more than union demands.
As far as I know, the only unions in my area out here in South Dakota is a professional union. The teachers union. Since they have 4 years of college, I wonder why they need a union? What do you have to say about that?
You never said that? Perhaps I should quote you exactly: "Some people just don't like to sit at a desk pushing a pencil, they prefer good honest work." I don't think it's too much of a stretch for me to assume that you are implying that sitting at a desk, "pushing a pencil" is not "good, honest work." If you are as capable of the level of reading comprehension as you boast, surely you can see the obvious here. You just lumped an entire group of people into a very derogatory category. If anyone can be accused of flaming, I am afraid it is you.Are you implying that those with professional jobs, who may have acheived them through rigorous study and course work, arent capable of "good, honst work?" If so, that's one of the more assinine, arrogant statements I've seen posted here. I leave this office more physically and mentally exhausted each day then I *ever* did digging foundation footers with a shovel during the summer with my dad's construction crew.
I never said that. I said your education gives you more specialized skills and that doesn't mean your any smarter then the next guy, now does it. Perhaps you should slow up a little and spend more time "comprehendng" what you read before you start flaming someone.
Believe it or not, it's the truth. My dad was a $9/hr construction worker and I was a $3/hr one. We both busted our ass for 10 hours a day. You can imply and infer what you want from that, but I don't really care. My father is an uneducated laborer who has always workd for someone else, but he's still one of the smartest and hardest working men I know. And he's damn near 70 now.I don't believe for a minute that you leave the office as physically tired after pushing a pencil all day as you did digging footers by hand. Not if you were working as hard as you should have been. I guess since it was your Dad's construction crew, maybe he let you slack off a little? Did he own the business? How is it that your so smart and your Dad's in construction?![]()
Well, according to you previous post, it does matter "what you are doing." Because some prefer good, honest work, as opposed to a desk job. :|I have no doubt that you leave the office mentally drained. When your mentally tired, your body seems tired also. It's not the same as being physically tired in my experience. Your still tired and that is not the point of this discusion anyway. I have experience in both because as a machinist some days I was programing all day long some and some days I was running parts all day long. On the days I was doing brain work I was able to do some simple "honey do" jobs if they didn't require too much concentration and on the days I did all physical labor I would come home and work on books for the farm, planing, etc.
In any case, after a good days work a person is tired. It doesn't matter what you are doing.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Unions served a purpose 50-80 years ago. Now they are just a method to coerce private entitlements.
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you believe because somebody goes to college to become some pencil pushing suckass Yuppie they automatically deserve to make more money than a Union Carpenter who has to go through 4 years of Apprentice School to become a Journeyman? What entitles them to that?
You could just as easily turn that around and ask you, "So you believe because somebody went to an Apprentice School to become some beer-drinking, slack-jawed, Blue-collar Redneck they automatically deserve to make more money that a Computer Science Major who had to study hard through 4 years of advanced math and algorithm design to become a System Architect? What entitles them to that?"
Both extremes are short-sighted and rather demeaning, don't you think. The job market is controlled by supply and demand. If what your Journeyman does is such a necessary and special talent, then he would be paid accordingly for his work, as he could not be easily replaced. We've seen a turn around in the IT industry in the last few years where "pencil pushing suckass Yuppies" have been in high abundance and low demand, hence the massive lay-offs and low pay.
There is nothing wrong with this system. It is very "natural" and self-balancing. What is unnatural are arbitrary restriction on who can work and for how much, based on little more than union demands.
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Your education gives you more specialized skills, it doesn't make you smarter. Can you overhaul an engine, build a house, machine a part, etc? Some people just don't like to sit at a desk pushing a pencil, they prefer good honest work.
Are you implying that those with professional jobs, who may have acheived them through rigorous study and course work, arent capable of "good, honst work?" If so, that's one of the more assinine, arrogant statements I've seen posted here. I leave this office more physically and mentally exhausted each day then I *ever* did digging foundation footers with a shovel during the summer with my dad's construction crew.
There is nothing wrong with this system. It is very "natural" and self-balancing. What is unnatural are arbitrary restriction on who can work and for how much, based on little more than union demands
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I agree. We should do away with unions. We should do away with corporations and we should do away with inheritance. Each person should be raised by the state and given a financial package at 18 and sent out into the world on an equal basis to do whatever he pleases as an individual. No laws will be allowed that supports any collective. We should practice real capitalism. We must do away with any social structure that leads to economic slavery precluding any attempt by slaves to get free.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I agree. We should do away with unions. We should do away with corporations and we should do away with inheritance. Each person should be raised by the state and given a financial package at 18 and sent out into the world on an equal basis to do whatever he pleases as an individual. No laws will be allowed that supports any collective. We should practice real capitalism. We must do away with any social structure that leads to economic slavery precluding any attempt by slaves to get free.
Originally posted by: Ferocious
Almost sounds like contract language left over from many decades ago when unions allowed people to get back at big business and government which had treated workers badly for so many years before.
I remember reading an old Steelworkers contract from a now defunct steel mill from the early '50s that had some stuff in there that was simply incredible. Including (but not limited to) a person could not be cited for sleeping/loafing on the job while lying down on a bench (or such) as long as he/she had one foot on the floor. :Q
Them workers were merciless and obviously revengeful.![]()
