Stuff you didn't know and probably don't care about

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sho'Nuff

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2007
6,211
121
106
I like factoids about old brands. Like the following:

The Chef Boyardee brand was the brainchild of Chef Boiardi, a New York chef who opened the Chef Boyardee company in the 1920's. During WWII his company was called upon by the U.S. government to assist war efforts by producing rations for the U.S. military, many of which look like the canned pasta products we still have around today. At one point the company was the largest importer of parmesan cheese in the U.S., as well as one of the largest importers of olive oil.

Many people know that the Coca Cola recipe once had cocaine in it. But fewer know that soda pop (or soft drinks) were originally developed in pharmacies for the express purpose of making medicine taste better. As a result, many early soda recipes included artificial and/or natural pharmaceuticals. One example (other than Coca Cola) is 7-UP, which included lithium citrate until 1950 and was administered to patients for its "mood stabilizing qualities."

Another fun brand factoid concerns the development of modern day charcoal briquettes. In the 1920's many Ford cars included a substantial number of wooden parts. As a result, a tremendous amount of wood scrap was generated by Ford manufacturing plants. After learning of a process to turn wood scraps in to charcoal, Henry ford decided to open a charcoal plant that would utilize the woodscraps from his car manufacturing plants (a relatively early form of horizontal integration). E.G. Kingsford, a relative of Henry ford, brokered the selection of the site for Ford's Charcoal plant, and eventually the plant (and company) were renamed "Kingsford" in E.G., honor. The relationship between Ford and Kingsford can be seen by comparing their two logos, which are quite close.

Ford-emblem.jpg


kfd-kingsford-logo-top-nav.png


Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo and lxskllr

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,544
3,540
136
2/3's of all 100 dollar bills circulate OUTSIDE of the US.

Have you ever noticed that you don't see $100 bills very frequently? This is because only about a third of $100 bills in circulation are held by people in the United States. High demand for U.S. currency in the world economy has caused a large number of $100 bills to circulate in other countries. The demand for U.S. currency overseas has been growing steadily since the 1990's. Foreign companies often prefer to do their business transactions in U.S. dollars and many individuals prefer U.S. currency for their savings.

More about the U.S. economy:

  • Founding Father Benjamin Franklin appeared on the $100 bill for the first time in 1914.
  • As of 2015, the United States has an annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 2.4%.
  • As of 2015, the median household income in the United States is $55,775 USD.
http://www.wisegeek.com/why-dont-i-see-100-bills-very-often.htm
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,544
3,540
136
Lebanon is a shocker. Portugal is kind of surprising as well given their debt situation.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,023
10,518
126
Lebanon is a shocker. Portugal is kind of surprising as well given their debt situation.
I'd have thought India would have made the list. It was my understanding the women collected gold jewelry as a sort of savings account that would be theirs alone, as opposed to husband's property

edit:
Maybe privately held gold isn't accounted for in that chart.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
The atomic bomb.


I'm probably going to end up on an FBI watch list... but it's hilarious how you can dumb atomic bombs down to squashing some nuclear material -- from what I've read from Wikipedia. The screenshot on that YouTube video looks like the squash it from every direction method. Other one is squash it at the end of a pipe barrel by firing a bullet at it.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
I'm probably going to end up on an FBI watch list... but it's hilarious how you can dumb atomic bombs down to squashing some nuclear material -- from what I've read from Wikipedia. The screenshot on that YouTube video looks like the squash it from every direction method. Other one is squash it at the end of a pipe barrel by firing a bullet at it.

Tom Clancy had a line in one of his books about that. Something to the effect that building the first atomic bomb took the combined efforts of thousands of the greatest scientists the world has ever seen and now it can be done by a couple of decent machinists if they have enough fissionable material. As long as you shape the implosion charges right and get them to fire simultaneously it's going to work.
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,544
3,540
136
Tom Clancy had a line in one of his books about that. Something to the effect that building the first atomic bomb took the combined efforts of thousands of the greatest scientists the world has ever seen and now it can be done by a couple of decent machinists if they have enough fissionable material. As long as you shape the implosion charges right and get them to fire simultaneously it's going to work.
I think getting the geometry of the shock wave is trickier than they let on. Otherwise NoKo would be a lot further along in development than they seem to be. It was just a couple years ago that they had a partial dud iirc.

If they mean you can get a partial detonation, then yeah, maybe. But that's going to be a tiny fraction of the the output you'd get from a proper explosion.

Also the timing issue is probably a lot more complicated since that affects the propagation of the shock wave.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
I think getting the geometry of the shock wave is trickier than they let on. Otherwise NoKo would be a lot further along in development than they seem to be. It was just a couple years ago that they had a partial dud iirc.

If they mean you can get a partial detonation, then yeah, maybe. But that's going to be a tiny fraction of the the output you'd get from a proper explosion.

Also the timing issue is probably a lot more complicated since that affects the propagation of the shock wave.

I think the "gun" type doesn't have any of those issues but I am definitely not an expert.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
I think getting the geometry of the shock wave is trickier than they let on. Otherwise NoKo would be a lot further along in development than they seem to be. It was just a couple years ago that they had a partial dud iirc.

If they mean you can get a partial detonation, then yeah, maybe. But that's going to be a tiny fraction of the the output you'd get from a proper explosion.

Also the timing issue is probably a lot more complicated since that affects the propagation of the shock wave.

You only get partial detonation no matter what. In a fission weapon max possible efficiency is 25% of the fissionable material converted to energy and in the real world bombs rarely get close to that nor do they need to. The Hiroshima bomb was something like 1% efficient, it would categorize as a fizzle by modern standards. It still did the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charmonium

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,544
3,540
136
You only get partial detonation no matter what. In a fission weapon max possible efficiency is 25% of the fissionable material converted to energy and in the real world bombs rarely get close to that nor do they need to. The Hiroshima bomb was something like 1% efficient, it would categorize as a fizzle by modern standards. It still did the job.
Dial-a-kiloton :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_yield
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
No big deal.

When we finally get anti-matter weapons all this will be forgotten.
Don't hold your breath.

http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/april-2015/ten-things-you-might-not-know-about-antimatter

Antimatter-matter annihilations have the potential to release a huge amount of energy. A gram of antimatter could produce an explosion the size of a nuclear bomb. However, humans have produced only a minuscule amount of antimatter.

All of the antiprotons created at Fermilab’s Tevatron particle accelerator add up to only 15 nanograms. Those made at CERN amount to about 1 nanogram. At DESY in Germany, approximately 2 nanograms of positrons have been produced to date.

If all the antimatter ever made by humans were annihilated at once, the energy produced wouldn’t even be enough to boil a cup of tea.

The problem lies in the efficiency and cost of antimatter production and storage. Making 1 gram of antimatter would require approximately 25 million billion kilowatt-hours of energy and cost over a million billion dollars.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,396
136
just as long as Trump doesn't figure out how to use the good atomic weapons we just might be ok
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,023
10,518
126
French Presses are really an Italian invention circa 1929

A French press, also known as a cafetière, сafetière à piston, Cafeteria, press pot, coffee press, or coffee plunger, is a coffee brewing device patented by Italian designer Attilio Calimani in 1929.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_press

I had to fix the press I got for my daughter this morning. The carafe fit in the plastic holder way too tightly, so I shaved down the ridges on the interior of the plastic holder. I used my puukko to do the cutting. I love that knife. I was having issues justifying buying another blade, but it's one of the best purchases I've made in awhile. I love the Scandinavian grind for ease of sharpening, and it takes a very keen edge. All for only ~$40.