waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
Have any studies tried to distinguish between families that wanted kids vs ones that had accidental kids? Having a kid at the wrong time would sure fuck everything up. Instead of makin the cash money as an engineer or something, you might be struggling as a night time janitor at Walmart. That would be a huge difference in overall satisfaction in life and the only difference is when the baby happened.
Most of my relatives with kids seem very happy. They're middle class to upper middle class, well established in their careers, and kids came late in the game. I don't think I really know anyone who has accidental kids.
My personal experiences might be a cultural thing. I'm just going by quick google results so the years are a bit old. In Canada in 2003, the average age for a first child was 28 years (link). Most births in Canada are to women over the age of 30. Overall fertility rate in Canada is 1.6 per woman. In the US where the OP's article was written, things are radically different. Teen pregnancy rate in the US is consistently about twice as high as Canada link. USA's fertility rate of 2.1 is about 31% higher than Canada; I'll guess many of these are accidental. Healthcare in the US is not free, so your kids doing stupid shit can easily bankrupt the family if you don't have good insurance.
i think this has a lot to do with it. Those that have kids and are happy do tend to be the ones who planned on it and were ready.
i had my first child at around 28 and i felt i was still to young.
I have seen people have kids at 20 and they just never seemed to be able to enjoy life as often.
i wonder what the age breakdown is of parents that lose the kids to foster care?
