Stroll down memory lane

Maiora

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
370
0
0
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
Originally posted by: Maiora
That guy was annoying.

bwahahahaha!

After reading some of your posts all I can say is "pot meet kettle". :p

Bwahahaha,
Kiss my ass tard.

Quoted For Banning

The old timers need to come back to this place and take out the trash. No wonder they all left.

 

montypythizzle

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,698
0
71
Originally posted by: Maiora
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
Originally posted by: Maiora
That guy was annoying.

bwahahahaha!

After reading some of your posts all I can say is "pot meet kettle". :p

Bwahahaha,
Kiss my ass tard.

Quoted For Banning

The old timers need to come back to this place and take out the trash. No wonder they all left.

I think the trash has been taken out, hence why they left, some of them probably included you.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Easy you two, let us keep this thread civil.

Forum Rules
1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
 

montypythizzle

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,698
0
71
Yeah I have only owned/used one 8-track unit in my life, didn't care for them when I had a CD player nearby.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,047
877
126
Funny seeing a Realistic audio component. I helped my GF move a friend of hers to a new apt, we are all in our mid fourties and I consider myself somewhat of an audiophile, and when I unboxed her stereo system I was pleasantly surprised to see this 30 year old receiver from Realistic! I forget the model number but I hooked it up, it had the flywheel tuner knob, the whole thing was solid metal and wood sides and had the famous Realistic Expansion stereo control! She also had some 30+ year old realistic tower speakers. So after I hooked it all up I attached my Archos AV-500 mp3 player to it via 3.5mm to RCA cable and hooked it up to the TV/AUX connection and cranked out some tunes and this system sounded just great! Ahhh, yesteryears stuff was made really well for a good price. Today you have to pay a premium for stuff that lasts even a decade.
 

Old Hippie

Diamond Member
Oct 8, 2005
6,361
1
0
I had a Muntz 4/8 track player in the car. There was a switch to go from 4 to 8 tracks. It slid into a wooden mounting box underneath the dash in my '63 Corvair Monza convertible. You could pull it from the mounting box, and use adaptors to make it a home bedroom stereo.
Pretty slick for 1968!
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,047
877
126
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
Yeah I have only owned/used one 8-track unit in my life, didn't care for them when I had a CD player nearby.

I still have that 8-track player from the 70s, the one with the T handle that also changed the tracks. I still own a few dozens 8-track cartridges but I'm sure they would disintegrate if I ever tried to play them.

 

Dude111

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2010
1,495
5
81
An interesting video.... I have heard ppl say 8-tracks dont sound very good and i wonder WHY IS THAT??

Arent 8 tracks ANALOGUE?? -- They SHOULD sound excellent! (I remember hearing an 8-track in the 80s and it sounded ok)
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
5378880749_414919f411.jpg


My dad bought something like this back in 1973. It was the best sounding thing I had ever listen to. Deep Purple, Black Sabbath sounded GREAT.
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
An interesting video.... I have heard ppl say 8-tracks dont sound very good and i wonder WHY IS THAT??

Arent 8 tracks ANALOGUE?? -- They SHOULD sound excellent! (I remember hearing an 8-track in the 80s and it sounded ok)

Why do you think analog sound reproduction should sound excellent?
Sure 8 tracks did sound great back in the 80s but compared to today's technology, it just pure garbage.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,127
616
126
Analog = no compression. What widely available modern audio format can claim that?
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Analog = no compression. What widely available modern audio format can claim that?

The lossless formats reproduce the sound perfectly so what's your point?
Analog sound reproduction like music on magnetic tape or vinyl records introduce all kind of audible noise no matter how sophisticated the playback hardware is.

A digital signal recorded on those media would actually sound better. When using 1 and 0 there is no imperfections, no noise, just perfectly encoded music easily reproducible. A 44 KHz sampling rate recording will reproduce 100% of the sound.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,127
616
126
CD is not a lossless format. DVD-A and SACD are closer but those are nowhere to be found.
 

kornphlake

Golden Member
Dec 30, 2003
1,567
9
81
Am I confusing compression with losssless? I've always considered CD audio, .wav, FLAC or other uncompressed digital files to be lossless whereas .mp3 and .wma formats are compressed and considered lossy. Or are you arguing that a digital waveform regardless of the format will always have square edges that approximate an analog waveform but can't perfectly fit a curve without an infinite number of samples per second.

If the latter, last time I was in Fry's they had a small selection of modern music for sale on vinyl LPs, it's the first time I've seen vinyl for sale in a chain store since the 80's. I'm not sure if other Fry's locations sell music on vinyl or not, it may be a regional thing, my city has several "record stores" that sell vinyl as well.
 
Last edited: