gaygaygaygaygaygaygaygay
gaygaygaygaygaygaygaygay
gaygaygaygaygaygaygaygay
Glorious.he doesn't have the intellectual capacity to argue with me,
How about something politically correct like, "Sexually Challenged". After all, they are a small minority and many are apparently desperate to get laid.
Fair enough, it's just that in my experience everyone has the capacity to be attracted to attractive people regardless of sex, I just think that "straight" people or "gay" people repress it. In my experience both gay and straight men will admit they have a preference for what makes either a man or woman attractive.
That implies there is some sort of difficulty about being gay... something that would make it a challenge. Also the "desperate to get laid" thing is just a crap stereotype. IMO Straight men are more desperate in that respect.
That implies there is some sort of difficulty about being gay... something that would make it a challenge. Also the "desperate to get laid" thing is just a crap stereotype. IMO Straight men are more desperate in that respect.
How about something politically correct like, "Sexually Challenged". After all, they are a small minority and many are apparently desperate to get laid.
Because you're an ignorant moron.
That is pretty standard view for someone who is bi I could see. As someone who is hetero myself? Nah.
That is pretty standard view for someone who is bi I could see. As someone who is hetero myself? Nah.
I was attracted to men since I was like 5 years old. Literally.
Women can be beautiful in many ways, stunning even. But to get a physical bodily reaction from me... impossible.
It's pretty easy to get laid as a gay man, but that is only if you don't care who you sleep with.
It is definitely more difficult being gay than being straight, I think that's pretty simple. We are ostracized, viewed as secondary citizens, do not have the same civil rights, and more likely to face bodily harm from extremists, aside from the usual verbal assault you'll get from strangers if you are out of the closet.
OK then, how about "Legally Sexually Challenged"? I know its a mouthful and personally I prefer gay to homosexual myself just because its short and sweet. Still, it helps get the point across.
The biggest question here is always why ?
Although it is not a fact that is true for all homosexuals, some male homosexuals share some behavior characteristics with females.
The same also applies when looking at female homosexuals.
Some "Butch" type lesbians exist. Some are extremely feminine.
The main differences in a male brain and a female brain can be found in the hypothalamus.
What is the really only characteristic difference between males and females when it comes to mating behavior is the preoptic hypothalamus.
The preoptic hypothalamus plays a role in the mating behavior exhibited by humans and other animals. It has 2 times the amount of cells in a male brain when compared to a female brain. This could have something to do with the increased sexual drive of males. But that is not all there is to know.
There is also a part that controls the biological clock.
The Suprachiasmatic nucleus. According to some researchers, this part is a piece of the puzzle when it comes to sexual orientation and perhaps what humans and other animals find sexual attractive.
Then there is the sexually dimorphic nucleus.
With heterosexual males this part of the hypothalamus is much larger than when compared to heterosexual females. The theory is that with homosexual males however, this part seems to be smaller as well.
Transsexuals, and then primary male to female transsexuals, have a smaller uncinate nucleus than when compared with heterosexual males who feel comfortable in their body. Also part of the hypothalamus. This part is smaller in size and neurons when compared.
Primarily, the sexual orientation and awareness is rooted in parts of the hypothalamus. It has to be, because in nature many "gay" animals can be found. And these do not have the neocortex and other parts that create the human conscience.
EDIT:
GAY : A term that explains happiness.
I doubt all gays are naturally happy.
That definition is somewhat outdated now, and I don't think any demographic is naturally happy.
Also I believe that behaviour can be an unconscious choice.
In my personal opinion it is environmental rather than biological. I believe everyone is born with the capacity to be any sexuality, but that things change in the way they perceive others through time. I'm bisexual, I would argue that I carry both male and female stereotypical characteristics, it's certainly an interesting area of query. There may be some causal link between biology and the persons resultant sexuality, but from my own experience / research sexuality is developed, not innate (though in some cases It would seem to be innate more often than not it appears to be developed)