Steve Nash wins the MVP

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
Nash has outplayed Kobe in this series, but the Lakers are up 3-1....hmm...isn't that the exact reason you said Nash should get the MVP - that he's made his team better, even though Kobe's stats are better?

You can't have it both ways!

Don't look now folks, but the winner of this series is going to get the Clippers, since the NBA playoff system is made by 8 year olds and the East and West aren't simply seeded 1-8 based on record....Lakers could very easily end up in the Western Conference finals.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
No one has outplayed kobe, IMO. I think he's just been playing within the game rather than intentionally dominating. It has paid off big time, as the rest of the team is firing on all cylinders right now. Who would have thought Lamar Odom and even to some degree Kwame Brown would be making good plays in a playoff game? Not me...
 

wkabel23

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 2003
2,505
0
0
The Lakers size had more to do with their first 2 victories than Kobe...game 4 was just an excellent clutch play by Kobe at the end. Although overall in terms of stats, Nash has outplayed Kobe in this series but that's not very comforting to Nash considering they're down in the series.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: torpid
No one has outplayed kobe, IMO. I think he's just been playing within the game rather than intentionally dominating. It has paid off big time, as the rest of the team is firing on all cylinders right now. Who would have thought Lamar Odom and even to some degree Kwame Brown would be making good plays in a playoff game? Not me...
Statistically Kobe hasn't been himself for 3 games and 3 quarters, mainly due to Raja Bell and quick double teams by PHO. He was horrid shooting in Game 1 and Game 3, and in Game 2 he shot decent but Nash shot even better. Yesterday Kobe shot better, but only took 12 shots going into the 4th Q (a lot had to do with foul trouble) which isn't going to get it done from your go to guy. He redeemed himself with his clutch play off very lucky 2nd chances, otherwise you have to say Raja is doing great on him.

Kwame and Odom have such a size advantage on PHO that it isn't surprising they're finally earning their paychecks. Kwame in Washington blew chunks which was why they traded him, he could only get better. Odom was down in ppg and reb this year, he wasn't playing to his potential either. It's about time they stepped up (as well as other unlikely heroes, for example D.George with 3 treys in the 4th).
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: NeoV
Nash has outplayed Kobe in this series, but the Lakers are up 3-1....hmm...isn't that the exact reason you said Nash should get the MVP - that he's made his team better, even though Kobe's stats are better?

You can't have it both ways!

Don't look now folks, but the winner of this series is going to get the Clippers, since the NBA playoff system is made by 8 year olds and the East and West aren't simply seeded 1-8 based on record....Lakers could very easily end up in the Western Conference finals.
Nash has made his team better, w/out him this series would have been over by now. His team was in a position to win late in all 3 of their losses, it could have went either way (um did you see Nash's 3 in OT with back spasms?). That has nothing to do with having it both ways.

Nash was MVP for other reasons aside from winning such as being the best passer and shooter in the league. 4 playoff games don't change that. But we've beaten this horse to death already.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Statistically Kobe hasn't been himself for 3 games and 3 quarters, mainly due to Raja Bell and quick double teams by PHO. He was horrid shooting in Game 1 and Game 3, and in Game 2 he shot decent but Nash shot even better. Yesterday Kobe shot better, but only took 12 shots going into the 4th Q (a lot had to do with foul trouble) which isn't going to get it done from your go to guy. He redeemed himself with his clutch play off very lucky 2nd chances, otherwise you have to say Raja is doing great on him.

Kwame and Odom have such a size advantage on PHO that it isn't surprising they're finally earning their paychecks. Kwame in Washington blew chunks which was why they traded him, he could only get better. Odom was down in ppg and reb this year, he wasn't playing to his potential either. It's about time they stepped up (as well as other unlikely heroes, for example D.George with 3 treys in the 4th).

Statistics schmatistics. He has played well enough, considering phoenix really only guards him and not so much anyone else. Any time a team is concentrating most or all of their defense on one guy, it's going to make the one guy look bad and the rest of his team look good. Same thing happened to Duncan in the playoffs a couple years back when more than one team decided to double team him at all times.

Raja bell is somewhat worthless as a defender against kobe. It's the double teams that are making him give up the basketball.
 

wkabel23

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 2003
2,505
0
0
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Statistically Kobe hasn't been himself for 3 games and 3 quarters, mainly due to Raja Bell and quick double teams by PHO. He was horrid shooting in Game 1 and Game 3, and in Game 2 he shot decent but Nash shot even better. Yesterday Kobe shot better, but only took 12 shots going into the 4th Q (a lot had to do with foul trouble) which isn't going to get it done from your go to guy. He redeemed himself with his clutch play off very lucky 2nd chances, otherwise you have to say Raja is doing great on him.

Kwame and Odom have such a size advantage on PHO that it isn't surprising they're finally earning their paychecks. Kwame in Washington blew chunks which was why they traded him, he could only get better. Odom was down in ppg and reb this year, he wasn't playing to his potential either. It's about time they stepped up (as well as other unlikely heroes, for example D.George with 3 treys in the 4th).

Statistics schmatistics. He has played well enough, considering phoenix really only guards him and not so much anyone else. Any time a team is concentrating most or all of their defense on one guy, it's going to make the one guy look bad and the rest of his team look good. Same thing happened to Duncan in the playoffs a couple years back when more than one team decided to double team him at all times.

Raja bell is somewhat worthless as a defender against kobe. It's the double teams that are making him give up the basketball.

Raja bell does as good of a job on Kobe as you can do. The match up between the two is intense...they don't like each other very much.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: wkabel23
Raja bell does as good of a job on Kobe as you can do. The match up between the two is intense...they don't like each other very much.

I don't see that at all. Yeah he does push and shove kobe, but he doesn't actually properly defend him much. It's always a double team or other people in the lane area. Bruce Bowen has played him well in the past, as has artest. Raja seems average at best. Without double teams kobe would definitely have no trouble with him.

I forgot the name of the guy from portland who dubbed himself the kobe stopper. Even that guy was better, and kobe manhandled him a few times after he called himself that.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Great job Steve-O...

The NBA playoffs kick ass!! I am really enjoying all of the action and I hardly ever watch NBA during the regular season.

Go Pistons!!
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: wkabel23
Raja bell does as good of a job on Kobe as you can do. The match up between the two is intense...they don't like each other very much.

I don't see that at all. Yeah he does push and shove kobe, but he doesn't actually properly defend him much. It's always a double team or other people in the lane area. Bruce Bowen has played him well in the past, as has artest. Raja seems average at best. Without double teams kobe would definitely have no trouble with him.

I forgot the name of the guy from portland who dubbed himself the kobe stopper. Even that guy was better, and kobe manhandled him a few times after he called himself that.
Maybe you don't watch the games, or did you miss the replays by TNT of Kobe's forced shots with Bell on him? Anyone who follows the playoffs (analysts like Hubie Brown) have all agreed that Bell is one of the good reasons why he shot 7-22 and 6-18. To totally attribute that to a double team every time is absolutely preposterous. However, I would expect that from someone who says "Statistics schmatistics" to discount Bell's effort.
 

wyvrn

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
10,074
0
0
Raja Bell is a very solid defensive player. I loved him with the Mavs a few years ago. He and Adrian Griffin provided nice perimeter defense, but I'm glad Raja has t he chance to start now.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: wkabel23
Raja bell does as good of a job on Kobe as you can do. The match up between the two is intense...they don't like each other very much.

I don't see that at all. Yeah he does push and shove kobe, but he doesn't actually properly defend him much. It's always a double team or other people in the lane area. Bruce Bowen has played him well in the past, as has artest. Raja seems average at best. Without double teams kobe would definitely have no trouble with him.

I forgot the name of the guy from portland who dubbed himself the kobe stopper. Even that guy was better, and kobe manhandled him a few times after he called himself that.
Maybe you don't watch the games, or did you miss the replays by TNT of Kobe's forced shots with Bell on him? Anyone who follows the playoffs (analysts like Hubie Brown) have all agreed that Bell is one of the good reasons why he shot 7-22 and 6-18. To totally attribute that to a double team every time is absolutely preposterous. However, I would expect that from someone who says "Statistics schmatistics" to discount Bell's effort.

aren't you the one also trying to argue that steve nash's team without him is no better than kobe's team without him?

can't have it both ways bud.

fact is, pheonix has more talent on the team at the moment without nash than the lakers do without kobe.

 

Supa

Member
Jun 26, 2003
177
0
0
Suns success with Nash ... how about Dallas's success WITHOUT Nash? Seems to me a 2 times MVP should not be so easily replaceable.


---
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: Supa
Suns success with Nash ... how about Dallas's success WITHOUT Nash? Seems to me a 2 times MVP should not be so easily replaceable.


---
Dirk gets better every year, and some say he could be the MVP if he improved his D/rebounding. The scary part would be if Dallas had kept them both, since neither were in their prime. Remember, Nash was never an MVP at Dallas, hindsight is 20/20.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: wkabel23
Raja bell does as good of a job on Kobe as you can do. The match up between the two is intense...they don't like each other very much.

I don't see that at all. Yeah he does push and shove kobe, but he doesn't actually properly defend him much. It's always a double team or other people in the lane area. Bruce Bowen has played him well in the past, as has artest. Raja seems average at best. Without double teams kobe would definitely have no trouble with him.

I forgot the name of the guy from portland who dubbed himself the kobe stopper. Even that guy was better, and kobe manhandled him a few times after he called himself that.
Maybe you don't watch the games, or did you miss the replays by TNT of Kobe's forced shots with Bell on him? Anyone who follows the playoffs (analysts like Hubie Brown) have all agreed that Bell is one of the good reasons why he shot 7-22 and 6-18. To totally attribute that to a double team every time is absolutely preposterous. However, I would expect that from someone who says "Statistics schmatistics" to discount Bell's effort.

aren't you the one also trying to argue that steve nash's team without him is no better than kobe's team without him?

can't have it both ways bud.

fact is, pheonix has more talent on the team at the moment without nash than the lakers do without kobe.
That's subjective. Walton is a better rebounder/defender than probably anyone on PHO. Nobody knew that he was capable of this. The Lakers have much better big men (defense, rebounding, assists), while PHO has better shooters/scorers. IMO they are easily a wash. Who on PHO is better than Walton? What about bench? Did you see Devean George explode while Barbosa has been very quiet all series? Who + Marion is better than Kwame/Odom?
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Originally posted by: meltdown75
The NBA playoffs kick ass!! I am really enjoying all of the action and I hardly ever watch NBA during the regular season.

Go Pistons!!

Agreed, this for the most part this has been a fantastic playoffs so far. One of the most exciting first rounds in many years imo. :thumbsup:
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
speed, I love your enthusiasm, but you are going way overboard here...lets look at a few of your comments...

"Walton is a better rebounder/defender than probably anyone on PHO" Come again? Luke Walton, not Bill Walton, right? Luke Walton is a terrible rebounder and defender. He's a smart player, a very good passer, and that's about it. Let's not get carried away here.

The worst thing you've said in this entire thread is your comment about the Cavs. You said that since Larry Hughes, Drew Gooden, and Z are statistically having worse seasons than they had last year it proves that LeBron isn't making his teammates better.

Wow.

The Cavs are in the playoffs for the first time since 1998. They won 50 games this year. Larry Hughes was hurt for nearly the entire 2nd half of the season. Drew Gooden's numbers are down because A.Varejon (sp?) gets more playing time this year, as well as the addition of D.Marshall - Gooden's minutes are down, not "LeBron isn't making him better".

As for Big Z, lets look at the stats again - this year vs last year - ppg = down 1.3 pts a game, shooting = 47% last year, 51% this year, FT shooting up 80% to 83%, rebounds, down 1 per game, minutes per game = 4.2 less this year. I fail to see anything in these stats that has anything to do with LeBron, other than shooting percentage, with LeBron getting him the ball much more this year in the pick and roll game, with Z hitting face-up shots more often.

Let's just agree to disagree. I say that while Nash is a great player, he's the beneficiary of a system in Pheonix that runs all game, which suits him perfectly, jacks up 3's like no NBA team has ever done before, and I do agree that he's had a more impressive season this year than last year, but with Amare and Marion available last year, this year's team doing as well as they did was a credit, in part, to him.

LeBron, in my opinion, should have been the MVP - statistics, team improvement, playing without #2 player for much of the 2nd half. Kobe in my opinion would be a close 2nd.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

Maybe you don't watch the games, or did you miss the replays by TNT of Kobe's forced shots with Bell on him? Anyone who follows the playoffs (analysts like Hubie Brown) have all agreed that Bell is one of the good reasons why he shot 7-22 and 6-18. To totally attribute that to a double team every time is absolutely preposterous. However, I would expect that from someone who says "Statistics schmatistics" to discount Bell's effort.

I do watch the games. I also watch almost every other playoff game kobe has been in. He has always had a low shooting percentage when shaq is on the bench or not on the team. There are also countless players who claim to be the kobe stopper or defend kobe well. They are all full of it, because none are any better than the other. Maybe if you want to make some weird argument that almost everyone who guards kobe guards him well in the playoffs, I suppose you could try that.

Kobe's numbers look off in the playoffs because he gets double teamed more and often has to take bad shots due to shot clock issues or because he thinks it's appropriate for him to take over.

Also, this whole "everyone who watches x says y" argument is only making you look less credible to me, because it is a gross exaggeration. Every announcer has stated only that he is doing a good job defending him, I agree with that. No one has said that kobe has looked terrible because of raja bell. Quite the opposite, actually. They all say he is doing a great job distributing to his teammates and stepping up his play when he needs to. There was the one game, 3 I think, where he missed some easy shots in the 4th, and they did not attribute that to bell at all. Instead they said, "he will make those shots this time".

Actually, the announcers really have only attributed one player's bad performance to the defender - shawn marion.
 

wyvrn

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
10,074
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Supa
Suns success with Nash ... how about Dallas's success WITHOUT Nash? Seems to me a 2 times MVP should not be so easily replaceable.


---
Dirk gets better every year, and some say he could be the MVP if he improved his D/rebounding. The scary part would be if Dallas had kept them both, since neither were in their prime. Remember, Nash was never an MVP at Dallas, hindsight is 20/20.


The reason Nash wasn't resigned was because of age / contract length. Most 36-37 yr old point guards hit a wall, and Dallas would have been liable for multimillions of dollars. Now Phoenix will face the same problem, eventually.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

Maybe you don't watch the games, or did you miss the replays by TNT of Kobe's forced shots with Bell on him? Anyone who follows the playoffs (analysts like Hubie Brown) have all agreed that Bell is one of the good reasons why he shot 7-22 and 6-18. To totally attribute that to a double team every time is absolutely preposterous. However, I would expect that from someone who says "Statistics schmatistics" to discount Bell's effort.

I do watch the games. I also watch almost every other playoff game kobe has been in. He has always had a low shooting percentage when shaq is on the bench or not on the team. There are also countless players who claim to be the kobe stopper or defend kobe well. They are all full of it, because none are any better than the other. Maybe if you want to make some weird argument that almost everyone who guards kobe guards him well in the playoffs, I suppose you could try that.

Kobe's numbers look off in the playoffs because he gets double teamed more and often has to take bad shots due to shot clock issues or because he thinks it's appropriate for him to take over.

Also, this whole "everyone who watches x says y" argument is only making you look less credible to me, because it is a gross exaggeration. Every announcer has stated only that he is doing a good job defending him, I agree with that. No one has said that kobe has looked terrible because of raja bell. Quite the opposite, actually. They all say he is doing a great job distributing to his teammates and stepping up his play when he needs to. There was the one game, 3 I think, where he missed some easy shots in the 4th, and they did not attribute that to bell at all. Instead they said, "he will make those shots this time".

Actually, the announcers really have only attributed one player's bad performance to the defender - shawn marion.
You just agreed with me, I'm confused. "Every announcer has stated only that he is doing a good job defending him, I agree with that." That's what people were saying, that Raja wasn't doing a good job on Kobe. Well, he is.

Then you say: "Kobe's numbers look off in the playoffs because he gets double teamed more and often has to take bad shots due to shot clock issues or because he thinks it's appropriate for him to take over."

So you're attributing Kobe missing a shot because he "thinks it's appropriate to take over" or "shot clock issues", but none of that has to do with Bell (which you just said has done a good job defending Kobe)? I'm not following you here, if Bell was transparent, then Kobe can take a shot uncontested and not worry about the shot clock. Only good defense is going to keep him from getting an easy shot at the end of the shot clock.

You should give credit where credit is due, Bell is a good reason why he shot 6-18 and 7-22, not only because of the double team (which comprises of 1/2 Bell too).

 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
You just agreed with me, I'm confused. "Every announcer has stated only that he is doing a good job defending him, I agree with that." That's what people were saying, that Raja wasn't doing a good job on Kobe. Well, he is.

Then you say: "Kobe's numbers look off in the playoffs because he gets double teamed more and often has to take bad shots due to shot clock issues or because he thinks it's appropriate for him to take over."

So you're attributing Kobe missing a shot because he "thinks it's appropriate to take over" or "shot clock issues", but none of that has to do with Bell (which you just said has done a good job defending Kobe)? I'm not following you here, if Bell was transparent, then Kobe can take a shot uncontested and not worry about the shot clock. Only good defense is going to keep him from getting an easy shot at the end of the shot clock.

You should give credit where credit is due, Bell is a good reason why he shot 6-18 and 7-22, not only because of the double team (which comprises of 1/2 Bell too).

The problem is, you can't differentiate between someone who does a good job defending kobe and someone whose defense greatly limits his play. If someone does a good job defending kobe, it really just means he isn't totally mauling them on offense and having his way such that someone else should be defending him or that a constant double team is necessary even at the top of the 3 point circle. As numerous commentators have said for the last several years, no one really stops kobe except kobe.

You shouldn't give false credit where it's due, is the real lesson. Bell is not doing any better job than a host of other people who have defended Kobe. Better than average? Probably. So well that Kobe is having trouble? Not even remotely.

No one is saying bell is making kobe take bad shots at the end of the shot clock. It's the fact that his team hasn't gotten off a shot and kobe can't develop a good shot like he normally would with 15 seconds left.

So yeah, bell is doing a good job in that kobe isn't totally dominating him, but not such a good job that "bell is the reason why kobe is 6-18" or any such nonsense.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: NeoV
speed, I love your enthusiasm, but you are going way overboard here...lets look at a few of your comments...

"Walton is a better rebounder/defender than probably anyone on PHO" Come again? Luke Walton, not Bill Walton, right? Luke Walton is a terrible rebounder and defender. He's a smart player, a very good passer, and that's about it. Let's not get carried away here.

The worst thing you've said in this entire thread is your comment about the Cavs. You said that since Larry Hughes, Drew Gooden, and Z are statistically having worse seasons than they had last year it proves that LeBron isn't making his teammates better.

Wow.

The Cavs are in the playoffs for the first time since 1998. They won 50 games this year. Larry Hughes was hurt for nearly the entire 2nd half of the season. Drew Gooden's numbers are down because A.Varejon (sp?) gets more playing time this year, as well as the addition of D.Marshall - Gooden's minutes are down, not "LeBron isn't making him better".

As for Big Z, lets look at the stats again - this year vs last year - ppg = down 1.3 pts a game, shooting = 47% last year, 51% this year, FT shooting up 80% to 83%, rebounds, down 1 per game, minutes per game = 4.2 less this year. I fail to see anything in these stats that has anything to do with LeBron, other than shooting percentage, with LeBron getting him the ball much more this year in the pick and roll game, with Z hitting face-up shots more often.

Let's just agree to disagree. I say that while Nash is a great player, he's the beneficiary of a system in Pheonix that runs all game, which suits him perfectly, jacks up 3's like no NBA team has ever done before, and I do agree that he's had a more impressive season this year than last year, but with Amare and Marion available last year, this year's team doing as well as they did was a credit, in part, to him.

LeBron, in my opinion, should have been the MVP - statistics, team improvement, playing without #2 player for much of the 2nd half. Kobe in my opinion would be a close 2nd.
Well we have 2 main ideas here:
1) The MVP should make his player better, and
2) The MVP had more talent to work with.

I'll address each.

Ilgauskas:
1)You're right, I overlooked minutes on Z's -4 minutes/game which could very well have dropped his ppg/reb, and the FG% (+4) is significant. He has shown improvement (+1ppg/40min).
2) But can you honestly say that he isn't on par with Diaw's numbers? Many would say a wash.

Gooden:
1) While you're right he did play less minutes, I don't think Lebron has made him that much better and here's why: he averaged almost 1 less ppg (.9) and less assists (.4) than when he was in Orlando in 2004, while playing even less (.5) minutes (albeit all 3 shooting %'s increased) in Orlando from 2 years ago. I wouldn't exactly say he improved that much from Orlando (in fact 1.5ppg/40min less).
2) Is Gooden's output comparable to Raja Bell's? Many would say yes it's a wash.

Hughes:
1) I did acknowledge that he only played 1/2 the season, but should that excuse his huge drop in production? Maybe, it's hard to say. It looks bad on paper though, because he averaged almost 2 less minutes in Washington (33.8 vs 35.6) 2 years ago and still scored -3 ppg than 2 years ago (that's roughly a -5 ppg/40minutes drop). Was he playing hurt maybe?
2) Hughes has the potential to put up close to Marion numbers (22ppg last year) and his assists edge almost completely closes the rebounding gap. Shooting %'s Marion is better in FG and FT%, but Hughes is definitely better at 3 %. You could give the very slight edge to Marion.

Snow:
1) Slightly down despite playing SIX more minutes per game than last year. Consider vs last year: -0.4 ppg/40min, -1assist/40min, same rebounds/40min. The only good thing about Snow is that his FG% +2.5, although his FT% -5%.
2) Anyone on the Suns is better in production (TT, Barbosa).

Marshall:
1) Down over 2+ppg (3.5ppg/40min) despite the same amount of minutes played in Toronto, -0.5 assist and rebound/game. FG%, 3pt%, and FT% all down by 5% or more! Horrid season for him.
2) Still better production than Tim Thomas and about the same as Barbosa.

Final Thoughts:
1) Overall Lebron improved 1 player out of the five I compared. Bell, Barbosa, Diaw, Marion all either improved their FG AND 3pt% or stayed the same. 3 of the 4 experienced dramatic increases in PPG/40 minutes (except Bell) in comparison to the year before. Huge edge to Nash in player improvement.

2) Slight edge to Lebron because let's face it, nobody on either team was as bad as Eric Snow this year. The Snow/Marshall production can't compare to the TT/Barbosa combo, even if Marshall is still better than TT. Hence I'd say a slight 0.5 - 1 player edge to Lebron. However, many would theorize that is neutralized by the fact that the Cavs play in the weaker East @only 50 wins vs Suns@54 in the West.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
You just agreed with me, I'm confused. "Every announcer has stated only that he is doing a good job defending him, I agree with that." That's what people were saying, that Raja wasn't doing a good job on Kobe. Well, he is.

Then you say: "Kobe's numbers look off in the playoffs because he gets double teamed more and often has to take bad shots due to shot clock issues or because he thinks it's appropriate for him to take over."

So you're attributing Kobe missing a shot because he "thinks it's appropriate to take over" or "shot clock issues", but none of that has to do with Bell (which you just said has done a good job defending Kobe)? I'm not following you here, if Bell was transparent, then Kobe can take a shot uncontested and not worry about the shot clock. Only good defense is going to keep him from getting an easy shot at the end of the shot clock.

You should give credit where credit is due, Bell is a good reason why he shot 6-18 and 7-22, not only because of the double team (which comprises of 1/2 Bell too).

The problem is, you can't differentiate between someone who does a good job defending kobe and someone whose defense greatly limits his play. If someone does a good job defending kobe, it really just means he isn't totally mauling them on offense and having his way such that someone else should be defending him or that a constant double team is necessary even at the top of the 3 point circle. As numerous commentators have said for the last several years, no one really stops kobe except kobe.

You shouldn't give false credit where it's due, is the real lesson. Bell is not doing any better job than a host of other people who have defended Kobe. Better than average? Probably. So well that Kobe is having trouble? Not even remotely.

No one is saying bell is making kobe take bad shots at the end of the shot clock. It's the fact that his team hasn't gotten off a shot and kobe can't develop a good shot like he normally would with 15 seconds left.

So yeah, bell is doing a good job in that kobe isn't totally dominating him, but not such a good job that "bell is the reason why kobe is 6-18" or any such nonsense.
We'll just have to agree that Bell's playing better than average defense on Kobe. ;)
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
We'll just have to agree that Bell's playing better than average defense on Kobe. ;)

Sure, I hope we can agree that other players have played even better defense against Kobe though.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
We'll just have to agree that Bell's playing better than average defense on Kobe. ;)

Sure, I hope we can agree that other players have played even better defense against Kobe though.
Yeah, for the most part, I think the PHO double team has been exceptional on Kobe. But they haven't doubled him every time.