I agree, it was said at least in the Senate no hats are allowed. The ex senator wasn't sure on house rules, but it still ia a bad look. She should have been made to remove it or be removed herself.I think he was playing for the camera, just like Pelosi did at times and one time in particular. The difference is she had a better reason to perform her slights. I don't have an issue with it honestly, everyone takes advantage of being in the spotlight. I hate that delusional, insurrection lovin, holy roller prick, but at least he kept his mouth shut.
I'd like to see the Sgt at Arms and friends start responding to people like Marge Traitor Green with their speedy removal, regardless of position or office held. The POTUS is making his address. Either offer applause or remain silent, your choice, but you can save the disrespectful spewing of horseshit for your next Fox Noise appearance. First offense gets you a warning, argue and you get kicked out. Second offense lands you in the brig.
Some people just want a dictatorship, they just don't want to say it out loud.I didn't watch the whole thing but my favorite line I heard was when he said "You can't love you country only when you win!"
(timestamped)
They feel the student being black is distractingThey feel that the hairstyle is "distracting"
Seems about right to me.
In my life, it seems like the American people elect the Democrats to fix things...like the economy. Then, once things are going well, aRepublican comes along, says tbe right things to get elected...things go to shit again...then in 4 or 8 years, the people wlect a Democrat to fix things...and the cycle repeats itself.
Yep. Dems build economies, repugs ruin them. Dems want to talk about solutions, repugs respond with bad faith negotiating and hostage taking tactics. Dems target inequity and poverty, repugs obstruct, actively develop and implement policies that increase both. Dems want to strengthen democracy, GQP won't stop trying to cripple it, even going so far as to vote against certifying valid election results because their crybaby couldn't handle the stomping he received.
You realize that there are substantial populations of liberal-leaning people in "red" states, right? And "blue" states have substantial numbers of conservative-leaning people. Advocating for a national divorce, especially when you live in a "blue" state just shows your utter contempt for those people that would be left in conservative paradises. Maybe you envision some way to move those people out of those states - but then you just have created a humanitarian crisis of mass ethnic cleansing to move them from their homes in this process. Frankly, the whole thought exercise is pretty gross.There's a saying.. no fort's walls are strong enough if they have a traitor inside.
It's beyond time for a national divorce and some moving on with our lives!
You realize that there are substantial populations of liberal-leaning people in "red" states, right? And "blue" states have substantial numbers of conservative-leaning people. Advocating for a national divorce, especially when you live in a "blue" state just shows your utter contempt for those people that would be left in conservative paradises. Maybe you envision some way to move those people out of those states - but then you just have created a humanitarian crisis of mass ethnic cleansing to move them from their homes in this process. Frankly, the whole thought exercise is pretty gross.
It's functionally impossible and would also undo Abraham Lincoln's greatest achievement of keeping the Union intact.You realize that there are substantial populations of liberal-leaning people in "red" states, right? And "blue" states have substantial numbers of conservative-leaning people. Advocating for a national divorce, especially when you live in a "blue" state just shows your utter contempt for those people that would be left in conservative paradises. Maybe you envision some way to move those people out of those states - but then you just have created a humanitarian crisis of mass ethnic cleansing to move them from their homes in this process. Frankly, the whole thought exercise is pretty gross.
The Great Migration - people fleeing the south because of an extended period of Jim Crow and domestic terrorism isn't the flex you think it is.If migrants can reach USA travelling across oceans and walking through jungles in South America.. maybe you underestimate just how resilient people with determination can be.
And in this country's history we've had the Great Migration.
So would life really be terrible if we actually could give them a better life if they could just reach it??
And oh.. maybe if they could fake texican spanish.. they could get free bus rides courtesy of Abbot??
It's functionally impossible and would also undo Abraham Lincoln's greatest achievement of keeping the Union intact.
Only morons would propose a "national divorce."![]()
We can also look to give people a better life by nationally supporting policies that give them a better life, instead of telling them, "get fucked, but if you happen to be able to scrape up the means to uproot your life, you're welcome to join us".
Only thing id like to add to these numbers is that 1950s number is probably single income earner household, while the 2023 is most certainly a two income earner household. If that is true, than we are behind?According to the Census the median household in 1950 made between $3,000 and $3,999. (of course $3,999 actually takes you up to the 64th percentile so it's probably more like $3,500 for the 50th)
![]()
Income of Families and Persons in the United States: 1950
Distribution of families and unrelated individuals by total money income, for the United States, urban and rural.www.census.gov
Being as generous as possible let's say the median American household made $4,000 in 1950. Adjusting for inflation we end up with roughly $52,500 in 2024 dollars.
Real median household income in the US for 2023 is estimated to be about $77,000. So that's about a 32% increase. Now estimates are hard and I'm sure everyone has slightly different methodologies but I think by any reasonable metric it is clear that the average American is much better off.
Yep, millions died in the American Civil War so future Xennials could say "fuck it, we give up. You guys fought for nothing."
I'm not the one with delusions of breaking the country apart. You're the one that would rather give up and condemn millions of people to some sort of conservative hellscape and create 2 countries irreparably diminished.I think you're losing a grip on reality here and trying to imagine a utopia when the reality is.. 15 years after Obamacare.. a lot of states still haven't opted in and there are zero signs they're going to.
If that doesn't tell you you can't change them.. nothing will.
And that's just a saying. If you've been paying attention, things have gotten measurably better over time. Are they perfect? No. Is there still work to be done? Absolutely.Ever hear the saying.. the more things change.. the more they stay the same!
Considering Democrats apparently aren't ever allowed to talk about successes, while Republicans claim success 24/7, how exactly are we supposed to convince people to support Democrats? There will always be problems, there will always be poor people. Why is it not okay to say we have incredibly low unemployment and rapidly raising my lower end wages, while still wanting to do more to help the poor?I am very, very familiar with the struggle of workers on the bottom of the scale, I know a lot of them.
I almost want to read your posts at the leftist open mic, and explain to them how they're all doing great based on your calculations. We don't get a lot of comedy acts.
I'm not the one with delusions of breaking the country apart. You're the one that would rather give up and condemn millions of people to some sort of conservative hellscape and create 2 countries irreparably diminished.
Nope. Personal income is also dramatically higher. I linked it earlier in the thread. We are just a lot richer.Only thing id like to add to these numbers is that 1950s number is probably single income earner household, while the 2023 is most certainly a two income earner household. If that is true, than we are behind?
I’ll just arrogantly speak for the forum and say this analogy makes no fucking sense.If I were to use an analogy since this is a computer forum..
You're telling me Macintosh is holy, sacred and should be worshiped and preserved
And I'm telling you it's a Mac-in-TRASH! And we need to come up with a better computer like maybe a power pc and eventually an Imac!