Someone had done
comparisons between the weapons used in both. Star Trek had more realistic power usage for their weapons while Star Wars were orders of magnitude higher. Not sure Star Trek shields would matter if getting hit by weapons from Star Wars.
Yeah, I think the power output of Boba Fett's ship was stated somewhere to be close to that of a Galaxy Class cruiser's warp core.
no shields = teleport photon torpedo into bridge
That's what kind of sucks about these situations with advanced tech, or even fairly low-tech tools.
The transporter can get through quite a lot of material, but it's rarely used as a weapon.
Videogames have the same problem.
Oh, you've got a rocket launcher and a gravity gun that can propel a 30-pound projectile at 60mph?
Nope, your ass is completely blocked by a rickety wooden door that can't be taken down by half a dozen rockets, grenades, C4 packs, a 60mph fire extinguisher, or 200,000 whacks with a crowbar.
Star Wars ships are too fast for Trek to win any sort of war.
In Star Wars people routinely travel from one side of the galaxy to the other. The whole point of Voyager was that it was going to take them a lifetime to get from the Delta quadrant back home.
Star Wars ships could literally choose their battles; hit and run your bases, supply depots, manufacturing centers, resources, and citizenry with impunity. You can't win against that kind of disparity in strategic maneuverability.
That's without even looking at the ship to ship match ups.
While still calling it "light speed."
Maybe it's a genericized trademark, like Kleenex or Xerox.
"If they did go into Light Speed®, they could be on the other side of the galaxy by now."
Or "Galaxy" was just the name of the classiest startruck stop&bar in the sector.
Rebel dogfighters in Star Wars were basically space versions of the A10 Warthog.
Imperial fighters were like an open wheel F1 race car with a laser cannon on the font.
Capital Ships were enormous cruise liners.
There was no real fancy effects or science to them. Just purpose built, blunt and crude appliances meant to perform a function. They clunked. They wobbled. They required a ton of human involvement.
Star Trek was a much more diplomatic and elegant approach to a more civil universe. It was like a lot of their stuff was meant for peaceful protests and non-lethal engagements. I think they tended to rely more on diplomacy and evasion than outright defense and attack.
There were some engagements too where a Galaxy-class would hold fire for most of the encounter, but then it would take one good shot at the other ship and drop its shields in one hit.
A big lumbering ship of exploration, but if it needs to, it'll knock you down a notch and
then see if you want to talk it over.
Other times, in heated combat, they felt the need to only occasionally squeeze a little somethin' out the phaser arrays. TV writers.
Given the number of times transporters have been thwarted by naturally occurring phenomena (radiation, weird metal ores, etc) they may not even be able to transport through Star Wars' unshielded hulls (which are some sort of neutronium alloy, if memory serves)
That'd explain why the Executor popped into a fireball the instant it hit the Death Star: Absolutely no crumple zone whatsoever. :awe:
The impact and deceleration occurred so darn fast that the crew and equipment in the ship were briefly exposed to 35,000 Gs.