The big important ones do
The can put up a shield over a whole planet but a Star Destroyer has to eat space dust and die.
Someone had done comparisons between the weapons used in both. Star Trek had more realistic power usage for their weapons while Star Wars were orders of magnitude higher. Not sure Star Trek shields would matter if getting hit by weapons from Star Wars.
no shields = teleport photon torpedo into bridge
Star Wars ships are too fast for Trek to win any sort of war.
In Star Wars people routinely travel from one side of the galaxy to the other. The whole point of Voyager was that it was going to take them a lifetime to get from the Delta quadrant back home.
Star Wars ships could literally choose their battles; hit and run your bases, supply depots, manufacturing centers, resources, and citizenry with impunity. You can't win against that kind of disparity in strategic maneuverability.
That's without even looking at the ship to ship match ups.
Kevin wiped out a hyper-violent galactic empire with a single thought. Force lightning, whoop!Star Trek gets rofl stomped for various reasons:
The fictional energy output of Star Wars ships is MUCH higher than star trek and would take out their shields in one shot. Also phasers would not harm armor resistant to lightsabers or massive cannons in the star wars universe.
The enterprise is the largest federation ship and is tiny compared to a mid sized Imperial or republic cruiser.
Star wars universe has explored most of the galaxy while star trek has only explored maybe 40% of theirs.
Many Many Star wars characters have frickin magic powers(the force), only one character in star trek has powers (Q) and he would win basically any matchup cuz he is pretty much god so you kinda have to exclude him.
There are far far more humanoids in the star trek universe due to the larger galaxy, the star trek universe would be overrun.
Its no contest. It would be a joke.
