How is this related to this topic? ;-) As far as I know given the came tCL, latency should match the normal DDR4 memory.
Pretty obvious - review of Ryzen 5 4500U above.
How is this related to this topic? ;-) As far as I know given the came tCL, latency should match the normal DDR4 memory.
Thats not real. Why bother to post a troll post, with a troll post ?Speaking of SMT4:
It’s real, it is just not what some people think it is and no one wants it.Thats not real. Why bother to post a troll post, with a troll post ?
Intel does not have a 64 core CPU, Where did you see that they do ? Not even a rumor that I have seen.It’s real, it is just not what some people think it is and no one wants it.
its the "ultimate" successors to larrabee , its got 2x 512bit vector units per core but the cores where in order( if i remember correctly) thus the SMT4 to sustain throughput.Why does this link say 64 core, 64 threads ? Its an Intel web page about that CPU ?
Intel® Xeon Phi™ Processor 7210 (16GB, 1.30 GHz, 64 core) Product Specifications
Intel® Xeon Phi™ Processor 7210 (16GB, 1.30 GHz, 64 core) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.ark.intel.com
Not to mention, it came out in 2016 and is discontinued now ? and was 1.3 ghz, max turbo 1.5 ghz ? I can see why it failed. And 215 watt for that pathetic performance ?
you may not remember this, because it's not a "real CPU" in the traditional sense. It was the HPC messiah. Guess how it's turned out!Why does this link say 64 core, 64 threads ? Its an Intel web page about that CPU ?
Intel® Xeon Phi™ Processor 7210 (16GB, 1.30 GHz, 64 core) Product Specifications
Intel® Xeon Phi™ Processor 7210 (16GB, 1.30 GHz, 64 core) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.ark.intel.com
Not to mention, it came out in 2016 and is discontinued now ? and was 1.3 ghz, max turbo 1.5 ghz ? I can see why it failed. And 215 watt for that pathetic performance ?
Bad things come in threesyou may not remember this, because it's not a "real CPU" in the traditional sense. It was the HPC messiah. Guess how it's turned out!
Where is this news but in english about dali being only 6 watts, i thought it was 15 watts (according to the wikichip article and others)?
Dali 6 watts:
A família de processadores híbridos AMD Dali oferecerá modelos com um TDP de não mais de 6 watts
Intel does not have a 64 core CPU, Where did you see that they do ? Not even a rumor that I have seen.
And look at the comment "trollllolololol"
The old Phi (hot garbage) is what came to mind with 64c/256t
Yeah IIRC it's basically a bunch of dressed up Atom cores, with about a 1/8th level of performance relative to 'real' Core series performance. So, this big "64 core" pile of stanky Phi ass is more like an 8 Core Xeon with super low clock speeds outside of a need for tons of low performance threads lol (which has got to be a pretty rare situation).
Written by one of AnandTech's writers. Not fake, but definitely trolling.
Larrabee was quite a novel design. It was designed originally as a GPU. The Pentium M cores used in the prototypes at the time were inexpensive to manufacture.
The real issue was execution. Unfortunately, Intel never figured out how to capitalize on this design.
The idea of massive amounts of x86 cores is not dead, and there are use cases.
One realization that came to mind when the 3970X and 3990X came out is just how close we are to real time software ray tracing, for example.
I expect AMD to explore their own version of Phi or Larrabee at some point. Imagine having 512-1024 general purpose Zen cores at your fingertips. Even at low clockspeeds, this would be a potent solution for some use cases.
I see your idea, but didn't this largely get superseded by GPGPU? I know Nvidia keeps expanding the feature sets of their SKUs for emerging DC and AI stuff. Given their interviews, it seems like Xe is focused on this as far as Intel is concerned. Even for work like Crypto, GPU is astonishingly more efficient compared to even fat cores, to say nothing of little stuff like Zacate/Atom scale.
AMD is poised to get back into it with Navi 20 it seems.
GPUs to this day still have limited instruction sets. There are many types of tasks that cannot easily/efficiently be performed on a GPU.
I expect both AMD and Intel to work towards convergence within the next couple of decades.
Anyone knows what sort of latency you could expect from LPDDR4-3200?
Just remembering that at the early of the 3d graphics accelerators the game engines also done software based 3d rendering and all done by the cpu.One realization that came to mind when the 3970X and 3990X came out is just how close we are to real time software ray tracing, for example.
Underfox said:
- Patent: Configuring dynamic random access memory refreshes for systems having multiple ranks of memory - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200027499.pdf
- Patent: Hardware transmit equalization for high speed - AMD A solution for performing reduced-latency equalization training to increase the data transfer rate... More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/10541841.pdf
- Patent: Refresh Scheme In a Memory Controller - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200020384.pdf
- Patent: Method and apparatus for virtualizing the micro-op cache - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200019406.pdf
- Patent: Multiple-table Branch Target Buffer - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200012497.pdf
- Patent: Low Loss T-coil Configuration with Frequency Boost for an Analog Receiver Front End - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/10530325.pdf
- Patent: Clock synthesizer with integrated voltage droop detection and clock stretching - AMD More details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200007082.pdf
- Patent: Branch Target Buffer With Early Return Prediction - AMD More Details: http://freepatentsonline.com/20200034151.pdf
Mmmmm....Some very interesting new AMD Patents (most for Zen 3 but some for GPUs)
It looks like the memory controller was heavily modified in zen 3, also some Micro-op cache improvements. Clock-stretching and an voltage droop detecion (improved somehow? as this has been in since steamroller cores).
I hope the memory latency improves as even with the chiplet-approach current AMDs memory controller has at least 10-15ns left on the table. Clocks should also improve (Just temper the expectations on the ST Boost front, MT will probably improve more)