That's not what happened.
? The last posts were a mini meltdown in the Skylake / Kabylake thread. https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/intel-skylake-kaby-lake.2428363/page-407
Did the success of Ryzen cause them to leave AT forums?
That's not what happened.
Nope? The last posts were a mini meltdown in the Skylake / Kabylake thread. https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/intel-skylake-kaby-lake.2428363/page-407
Did the success of Ryzen cause them to leave AT forums?
Compare apples to apples - Pinnacle Ridge 6C/12T at 4GHz vs this sample, also at 4GHz.
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/13241660?baseline=13267824
ST up by ~11% MT up by ~15%
Compare apples to apples - Pinnacle Ridge 6C/12T at 4GHz vs this sample, also at 4GHz.
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/13241660?baseline=13267824
ST up by ~11% MT up by ~15%
And also that the AES MT score of this CFL is highly inflated for some reason...Very impressive results, even more so considering atrociuos memory latency. I took the liberty to compare the results to 4Ghz CFL with tight memory:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/13241660?baseline=13277187
The fact that Ryzen operates so well with latency twice as high is incredible.
6/12 Matisse Zen 2 in Geekbeench, what CPU clocks where do you see 4ghz?Geekbeench only shows 3.2ghz for green Matisse sample?
If we go by this, 3.2ghz green dragon is faster than 4ghz 6/12 R5 2600X?
Regardless if one counts them or not, they were all fixed so no longer matter anyway.No, the hit piece done by CTS labs on AMD doesn't count as these "vulnerabilities" required root access on the system to exploit.
I'm confused. What exactly do we KNOW right now? As far as I see, all we have is confusing teases.the adoredtv leak is falling apart, nice
only thing left is clocks, lets see how my 4,7 GHz prediction fares
ryzen 5 is 6c/12t contradicting the adoredtv "leak":I'm confused. What exactly do we KNOW right now? As far as I see, all we have is confusing teases.
I'm confused. What exactly do we KNOW right now? As far as I see, all we have is confusing teases.
ryzen 5 is 6c/12t contradicting the adoredtv "leak":
The keynote is at 7PM tonight pacific time as far as I can tell.
After 3k replies and months of speculation it's all coming down to the keynote it looks like. I'm not sure how Lisa Su pulled it off, but it looks like she's clamped down hard on the leaks.
I have no clue how getting the naming scheme wrong contradicts a leak. Adored gave that leak months ago and the naming scheme was certaintly subject to change. Remember that leaks like that signify what AMD was planning months ago. AMD changing their mind in the subsequent months and renaming things doesn't make the leaks wrong.ryzen 5 is 6c/12t contradicting the adoredtv "leak":
ryzen 5 is 6c/12t contradicting the adoredtv "leak":
It depends on what you are expecting. We were promised more cores, more IPC, more clocks, similar TDPs, same socket/backwards compatibility. All leaks point out to ~15% general IPC improvement with up to ~2x in AVX/FMA workloads. Clocks seem to reach high depending on the model (almost ~5Ghz Turbo @ stock should be seen on at least one model in the lineup). This is going to be a huge launch that will make intel's HEDT platform(i9-7980XE) look silly and relegate their top of the line mainstream SKU (9900K) to midrange class.Or it’s a disappointment....
However we will find out more in 12 hours.
In all fairness to the 9900k, the FX9590 never sat at the top of the desktop performance heap. The 9900k is top dog until Monday, not counting HEDT...
It depends on what you are expecting. We were promised more cores, more IPC, more clocks, similar TDPs, same socket/backwards compatibility. All leaks point out to ~15% general IPC improvement with up to ~2x in AVX/FMA workloads. Clocks seem to reach high depending on the model (almost ~5Ghz Turbo @ stock should be seen on at least one model in the lineup). This is going to be a huge launch that will make intel's HEDT platform(i9-7980XE) look silly and relegate their top of the line mainstream SKU (9900K) to midrange class.
It depends on what you are expecting. We were promised more cores, more IPC, more clocks, similar TDPs, same socket/backwards compatibility. All leaks point out to ~15% general IPC improvement with up to ~2x in AVX/FMA workloads. Clocks seem to reach high depending on the model (almost ~5Ghz Turbo @ stock should be seen on at least one model in the lineup). This is going to be a huge launch that will make intel's HEDT platform(i9-7980XE) look silly and relegate their top of the line mainstream SKU (9900K) to midrange class.
How come single-thread performance barely went up while multi-thread performance went up by almost 20%?
