I don't know if I'd go so far to claim Navi 21 is a superior product, but it's pretty clear that it isn't an inferior one either. Even at 4K there are still several titles where it performs better than Ampere (just like there are some in the lower resolutions where it still loses) so if all a person cares about it one particular title then that's all that matters. If all someone cares about is the best RT possible, then NVidia is obviously the superior product, but if you're a eSport streamer that just wants the fastest 1080p results AMD is clearly ahead. Trying to use some arbitrary set of categories and an average of how many each company "wins" isn't particularly useful, especially when the cards are both pretty close in general performance and each has their own unique set of strengths.
I realize that you've had some reliable insider information about how RDNA2 was going to stack up, but I think most of us are quite surprised that AMD is actually competitive with NVidia's top cards. When's the last time that they were within 5% at the high end? You have to go back to early GCN and typically NVidia would launch something a few months later that would create a fairly massive gap that AMD would need to catch up to all over again. With this generation we know that NVidia really doesn't have anywhere to go, because they've already released their absolute best card in the 3090, which doesn't scale all that well over the 3080.
Meanwhile AMD has the eventual option of releasing a card with faster GDDR6X memory and some of the leaks have suggested that AIB cards can be pushed a fair bit further in the overclocks, so there's a good possibility that in 8 months we see a mid-generation refresh from AMD that does have a solid lead in 4K averages. Never mind that console ports are are likely to do better on Navi since the consoles share the same RDNA2 architecture. It's pretty ludicrous for AMD to be in this position at all quite frankly.