• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Speculation: RDNA2 + CDNA Architectures thread

Page 181 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
There's no real split of RAM or VRAM on consoles, they operate on the Heterogeneous model. There are ofc, "CPU" workloads that sits in the shared memory that would remain in the system RAM on PC. Stuff like audio & game logic. But the rest are GPU.

Maybe I hustled worded my post poorly but that's essentially what I meant. A GPU with 16 GB of VRAM has that 16 GB to itself. The consoles have to use that memory for other things. This means that even though the consoles have 16 GB of memory we're not going to see many PC games that require that full amount or hit some kind of wall at that point.
 
Haven't seen it mentioned before, with MI100 the first CDNA card appears to be launching on November 16 which is sooner than the RDNA2 cards. Will be interesting to hear how much it will deviate from and have similarities to GCN and/or RDNA2.

 
Haven't seen it mentioned before, with MI100 the first CDNA card appears to be launching on November 16 which is sooner than the RDNA2 cards. Will be interesting to hear how much it will deviate from and have similarities to GCN and/or RDNA2.


I believe that is Arcturus though? That should be roughly the same as a Radeon VII (i.e. vega20) + cooperative matrix multiplication for NN (i.e. pretty much tensor cores) but no support for rendering or display.

The lack of rendering is why I believe we will see RDNA 1/2/... cards in the datacenter for visualization and cloud gaming purposes. (i.e. the split really is graphics vs. compute, not consumer vs. prosumer vs. datacenter)
 
Haven't seen it mentioned before, with MI100 the first CDNA card appears to be launching on November 16 which is sooner than the RDNA2 cards. Will be interesting to hear how much it will deviate from and have similarities to GCN and/or RDNA2.


That November date isn't its for sale date though from what I have seen. Its the announcement date with details and such. Which we already had for RDNA2 cards.
 
When Big Kahuna Navi finally gets released.

cIp1XhG.gif
 
Luckily we can buy new pretty cheap gaming consoles. :mask:

Nooo! This is not happening!
 
Yes, noticed the source was Videocardz...
It's like WhyCry can only report extremes (at least he does use the rumor banner). First there was no way any RX 6000 could touch RTX 3080, barely 3070, nevermind 3090, now a report of a lowly 6800 surpassing 3090 1.5 fold in compute is worth a mention?
 
So Navi21 has that much headroom over stock 2.1-2.2GHz? That's awesome. Even when pushed that far out, power doesn't spiral out of control. That's still lower than a stock 3090 IIRC

Assuming that was done on air, I wonder how much further it could go with a full cover block.
Could have just been a suicide run if it was just on air.
 
Seems to be a fake

Why would anyone believe this crap? There's nothing to suggest Navi will do better in crypto mining - in fact it should do the opposite.

The top profitable crypto is still Ethereum. The workload is very stressful to the memory subsystem and Ampere has loads of what Navi doesn't have.

6800XT beating 3090 by 1.5x in crypto mining! Stop being so gullible!
 
Back
Top