By 1.5 - 2%. Total win indeed. Are you even looking at the numbers?Guess what, 7900x beats the 6950x clock for clock with only half the cache.
That's only Cinebench.By 1.5 - 2%. Total win indeed. Are you even looking at the numbers?
AMD has stuck with a yearly cadence for their desktop CPUs. I expect a full launch in early-mid April starting with with a 3700x or 3800x. I would be surprised if this this not happen. Rumors of a 10% IPC increase (at least) have been floating around, such an increase along with an increase in clockspeed due to the 7nm process would make Ryzen more than competitive with Intel offerings, even as Intel moves to 8 core.Yeah. By 2019-Q1, assuming AMD is aiming for 2019-Q2 for the launch of the Ryzen 3000 series, they should be able to do a paper launch and/or public performance demos to take the limelight from i9-9900K, should they see the need to. However, they might just stick with Threadripper and pricing.
That would be nicer. That means Aug or Sept Launch.That roadmap leak from XFastest is supposedly outdated. The updated roadmap shows i9-9900K arriving in 2018-Q3, which will give i9-9900K a three quarter window, and hence a bigger problem for AMD.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=&tl=en&u=https://hk.xfastest.com/11058/intel-new-raodmap-2018-2019-i9-9900k-i7-9700k/
It looks like you still have to wait a couple of months:It's August now, so...
The Q1-2019 was just wrong.Which is Q4
So there's three roadmaps, and each has a different release date.
One of them must be right, surely.![]()
Are you talking about the i9 9900K? That's going to be at least $100 more.where can I preorder 9900K ?
it is not a bad buy when I consider total system cost. with 9900K I don't need such a expensive low latency memory as with ryzen so for like 50 USD higher I get 10-15% ipc, 20% more frequency. 50 USD when considering mobo+RAM+CPU cost in this price category is a no brainer.
This time good one intel. Even on the price side-I though I would never give a like to intel for price![]()
Yeah, and since Z370 is mature now, board prices are cheaper than at launch, some good deals too. The problem i guess is getting one ready for 8C, with the right (new bios) or having a CPU to borrow.it is not a bad buy when I consider total system cost. with 9900K I don't need such a expensive low latency memory as with ryzen so for like 50 USD higher I get 10-15% ipc, 20% more frequency. 50 USD when considering mobo+RAM+CPU cost in this price category is a no brainer.
2700x is $330 WITH a good HSF. 9900k will most likely be at least $500 and no HSF, so like $200 more for 10% IPC or less.where can I preorder 9900K ?
it is not a bad buy when I consider total system cost. with 9900K I don't need such a expensive low latency memory as with ryzen so for like 50 USD higher I get 10-15% ipc, 20% more frequency. 50 USD when considering mobo+RAM+CPU cost in this price category is a no brainer.
This time good one intel. Even on the price side-I though I would never give a like to intel for price![]()
$200 more for ~10% IPC and ~20% higher max clocks does sound fair to me. AMD simply does not have offerings in that performance class. And i the past forum crowd jumped to spending hundreds on new systems that offered maybe 5% performance increase gen over gen.2700x is $330 WITH a good HSF. 9900k will most likely be at least $500 and no HSF, so like $200 more for 10% IPC or less.
more like available january 20188000 series was announced end of September (Q3) and was officially available in Oct (Q4).
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11869/intel-announces-8th-generation-coffee-lake-hex-core-desktop-processors
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11859/the-anandtech-coffee-lake-review-8700k-and-8400-initial-numbers
Probably the same thing this time around.
You definitely buy a new HSF for 2700X for overlocking. The same of choice as for 9900K.2700x is $330 WITH a good HSF. 9900k will most likely be at least $500 and no HSF, so like $200 more for 10% IPC or less.
It's 'good' for stock frequencies and turbo boosts, but also a bit noisy under load. It's actually a very decent stock HSF but not that suitable for overclocking, not that you can overclock a 2700X much even with upgraded cooling.2700x is $330 WITH a good HSF. 9900k will most likely be at least $500 and no HSF, so like $200 more for 10% IPC or less.
This made my day: people paying a considerable premium for the latest and greatest product from Intel, yet saving a few bucks on memory. The acrobatics are amazing, the savings are real!with 9900K I don't need such a expensive low latency memory as with ryzen so for like 50 USD higher I get 10-15% ipc