Originally posted by: n yusef
Originally posted by: soulcougher73
Originally posted by: n yusef
The article should have specified which African country from which she emigrated. I doubt a news article would ever call someone a "European immigrant" or "Middle Eastern immigrant."
It doesnt really matter which country it was. This is not about racism, its about being offended by the flag of a country you freely choose to come to. It could have been a French woman who was offended and it would still be the same outcry of send her back to France then.
Thinking of Africa as one country, comparable to France, is racist. I'm not necessarily calling out any posters here, but the news article is racist.
Sometimes it's best to stop and think for a moment before immediately leaping to conclusion and calling people/articles etc "racists".
It may be that the woman who was interviewed (the article was quoting her) did not know or remember at that time which specific African country the other immigrated from. And the complainer did not want to speak with the reporter (who could have then clarified which country)
It may that the newspaper did want to specify the country out of respect for the 'complainer', to state the specific country would surely identify her and provide her with no plausible deniability.
It may be that the newspaper did not want to identify the country for fear of labeling all immigrants from there as 'USA flag haters' or just bitchy people, whatever.
It's equally likely the person was from an Arab Muslim country (as opposed to black Africa), they may not have wanted to 'go there'.
It's entirely likely that the editor felt the specific country of origin is of no import to the point of the article/story, thus no good reason for it's inclusion.
IMO, the least likely reason for omitting the specific was racism.
--------------------
I smell BS.
In the original article it is said the person making the complaint was "offended"
Now they say the problem was the size, as if it was some inconvenience or distraction etc.
Unless the 1st article was flat-out incorrect, or a massively poor choice of words, "offended" does not translate into an objection about the size.
Fern