sons over daughters

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
I would opine that these numbers would be the same world wide, or maybe even a higher preference for a boy.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.
 

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.

But it seems the vast majority of Democrats find the idea of killing unborn babies, no matter their sex, as sport and fun.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.

There was an article out the other day about that exact topic. In china and india families are aborting pregnancies because of gender and it looks like scew the natural gender ratio.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
There was an article out the other day about that exact topic. In china and india families are aborting pregnancies because of gender and it looks like scew the natural gender ratio.

A little while back I posted a story about Indians letting their daughters die because they didn't want them. I'm not denying abortion is part of it, but it goes beyond that even to allowing born children to die from starvation.
 

Binarycow

Golden Member
Jan 10, 2010
1,238
2
76
stupid thing to do killing their daughters. Their sons grow up without enough girls to marry so they all suffer blue-balled disorder and turn extremists. Maybe we should collect all the crackwhores and welfare moms over here and air-drop them over there to take care of two problems in one stroke.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
given the age gap, I wonder to what extent it's driven by guys wanting a son to pass their name down to.
 

Rastus

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,704
3
0
It's always been that way. A son is more likely to support you when you get old. And there is no dowry to pay, or an expensive wedding.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
stupid thing to do killing their daughters. Their sons grow up without enough girls to marry so they all suffer blue-balled disorder and turn extremists. Maybe we should collect all the crackwhores and welfare moms over here and air-drop them over there to take care of two problems in one stroke.

Creative solution and an interesting idea.
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
But it seems the vast majority of Democrats find the idea of killing unborn babies, no matter their sex, as sport and fun.

Get it right; that's up to the woman to decide what she wants to do with her body. There is even a fucking law supporting this.

If you want to make it look like all pro-choicers are running around with high powered vaccums, sucking out unborn babies, go ahead - you hysterical dolt. Regardless of you villifying people who want to have a choice, this is still the law.

Remember, if you run to the law in regards to owning guns, women can run to the law in regards to doing what they want with their bodies - so fuck off already. It's a done deal, get over it. Now, go run an orphanage filled with unwanted children abandoned by "good Christians" who decided not to have an abortion.

Let me guess; WUT HABOUT DUH LITTLE BABY, WURS HIS CHAWSES?!

What about the countless dead from your awful wars? Please don't bring up valueing life. Because the same people who scream and yell about murdering babies are OK with;
- death penalties
- innocents killed in a war
- shooting an abortion doctor in the face
- shooting and then asking questions (hey! he wuz on mah propertay!!)
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
are OK with;
- death penalties

Apparently you are too stupid to even understand your own post. "Penalties" -- ie, a legal punishment for some heinous action after someone has been afforded due process and found guilty. Even someone as stupid as yourself can understand there's a difference.
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
Apparently you are too stupid to even understand your own post. "Penalties" -- ie, a legal punishment for some heinous action after someone has been afforded due process and found guilty. Even someone as stupid as yourself can understand there's a difference.

Gas, electricution, lethal injection, etc. More than one method of capital punishment in this country. Meaning, it's plural.

Now, no one uses penalties. It IS Dealth Penalty. However, since every sicko conservative likes to get mouth foaming insane over the horrible ways American Liberals are going around murdering babies, they have no problem with gasing, electricuting and poisoning people who may very well be innocent.

EDIT: I had to clear up the "ways to die" is in regards to capital punishment. Some may have a difficult time following the conversation.
 
Last edited:

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Gas, electricution, lethal injection, etc. More than one method of capital punishment in this country. Meaning, it's plural.

Now, no one uses penalties. It IS Dealth Penalty. However, since every sicko conservative likes to get mouth foaming insane over the horrible ways American Liberals are going around murdering babies, they have no problem with gasing, electricuting and poisoning people who may very well be innocent.

EDIT: I had to clear up the "ways to die" is in regards to capital punishment. Some may have a difficult time following the conversation.

Sorry dude, but murdering definitely innocent babies by deliberate action is a whole lot worse than death to possibly innocent adults by judicial mistake.
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
Sorry dude, but murdering definitely innocent babies by deliberate action is a whole lot worse than death to possibly innocent adults by judicial mistake.

Regardless, the law allows it.

Next up, God. Now, let me guess, you know what He thinks, right?
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Regardless, the law allows it.

Next up, God. Now, let me guess, you know what He thinks, right?

The law allowing the killing of people like Charles Manson, with the occasional tragic mistake (of which so far there have been none), doesn't trouble me to the extent that allowing the killing of babies does.

If there is a God, I would like to assume He would frown on the practice of deliberately destroying the helpless and the innocent, while turning a slightly more lenient eye on mistakenly killing in pursuit of justice.
 
Last edited:

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
while turning a slightly more lenient eye on mistakenly killing in pursuit of justice.

I doubt that. But, I will know when I meet Him.

Until then, I leave the issue of abortions up to the people who have the proper say and right to decide what they want to do with their bodies - women.

No apologies what so ever, it's the law, women decide. Make the move to reverse the law, if you like. But, you can not stop a woman from deciding what she wants to do with her body.

So, place your efforts on opening up support centers for pregnant women to avoid abortions. Or, since you value life so much, seek out to save those "mistakenly" killed in the pursuit of justice.