• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

sons over daughters

I would opine that these numbers would be the same world wide, or maybe even a higher preference for a boy.
 
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.
 
Infohawk said:
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.
Click to expand...

But it seems the vast majority of Democrats find the idea of killing unborn babies, no matter their sex, as sport and fun.
 
Infohawk said:
As long as other people aren't killing their daughters (like some Indians) that's fine. I find it interesting that less educated people and Republicans prefer boys.
Click to expand...

There was an article out the other day about that exact topic. In china and india families are aborting pregnancies because of gender and it looks like scew the natural gender ratio.
 
charrison said:
There was an article out the other day about that exact topic. In china and india families are aborting pregnancies because of gender and it looks like scew the natural gender ratio.
Click to expand...

A little while back I posted a story about Indians letting their daughters die because they didn't want them. I'm not denying abortion is part of it, but it goes beyond that even to allowing born children to die from starvation.
 
stupid thing to do killing their daughters. Their sons grow up without enough girls to marry so they all suffer blue-balled disorder and turn extremists. Maybe we should collect all the crackwhores and welfare moms over here and air-drop them over there to take care of two problems in one stroke.
 
It's always been that way. A son is more likely to support you when you get old. And there is no dowry to pay, or an expensive wedding.
 
Binarycow said:
stupid thing to do killing their daughters. Their sons grow up without enough girls to marry so they all suffer blue-balled disorder and turn extremists. Maybe we should collect all the crackwhores and welfare moms over here and air-drop them over there to take care of two problems in one stroke.
Click to expand...

Creative solution and an interesting idea.
 
a777pilot said:
But it seems the vast majority of Democrats find the idea of killing unborn babies, no matter their sex, as sport and fun.
Click to expand...

Get it right; that's up to the woman to decide what she wants to do with her body. There is even a fucking law supporting this.

If you want to make it look like all pro-choicers are running around with high powered vaccums, sucking out unborn babies, go ahead - you hysterical dolt. Regardless of you villifying people who want to have a choice, this is still the law.

Remember, if you run to the law in regards to owning guns, women can run to the law in regards to doing what they want with their bodies - so fuck off already. It's a done deal, get over it. Now, go run an orphanage filled with unwanted children abandoned by "good Christians" who decided not to have an abortion.

Let me guess; WUT HABOUT DUH LITTLE BABY, WURS HIS CHAWSES?!

What about the countless dead from your awful wars? Please don't bring up valueing life. Because the same people who scream and yell about murdering babies are OK with;
- death penalties
- innocents killed in a war
- shooting an abortion doctor in the face
- shooting and then asking questions (hey! he wuz on mah propertay!!)
 
Macamus Prime said:
are OK with;
- death penalties
Click to expand...

Apparently you are too stupid to even understand your own post. "Penalties" -- ie, a legal punishment for some heinous action after someone has been afforded due process and found guilty. Even someone as stupid as yourself can understand there's a difference.
 
PokerGuy said:
Apparently you are too stupid to even understand your own post. "Penalties" -- ie, a legal punishment for some heinous action after someone has been afforded due process and found guilty. Even someone as stupid as yourself can understand there's a difference.
Click to expand...

Gas, electricution, lethal injection, etc. More than one method of capital punishment in this country. Meaning, it's plural.

Now, no one uses penalties. It IS Dealth Penalty. However, since every sicko conservative likes to get mouth foaming insane over the horrible ways American Liberals are going around murdering babies, they have no problem with gasing, electricuting and poisoning people who may very well be innocent.

EDIT: I had to clear up the "ways to die" is in regards to capital punishment. Some may have a difficult time following the conversation.
 
Last edited:
Macamus Prime said:
Gas, electricution, lethal injection, etc. More than one method of capital punishment in this country. Meaning, it's plural.

Now, no one uses penalties. It IS Dealth Penalty. However, since every sicko conservative likes to get mouth foaming insane over the horrible ways American Liberals are going around murdering babies, they have no problem with gasing, electricuting and poisoning people who may very well be innocent.

EDIT: I had to clear up the "ways to die" is in regards to capital punishment. Some may have a difficult time following the conversation.
Click to expand...

Sorry dude, but murdering definitely innocent babies by deliberate action is a whole lot worse than death to possibly innocent adults by judicial mistake.
 
Atreus21 said:
Sorry dude, but murdering definitely innocent babies by deliberate action is a whole lot worse than death to possibly innocent adults by judicial mistake.
Click to expand...

Regardless, the law allows it.

Next up, God. Now, let me guess, you know what He thinks, right?
 
Macamus Prime said:
Regardless, the law allows it.

Next up, God. Now, let me guess, you know what He thinks, right?
Click to expand...

The law allowing the killing of people like Charles Manson, with the occasional tragic mistake (of which so far there have been none), doesn't trouble me to the extent that allowing the killing of babies does.

If there is a God, I would like to assume He would frown on the practice of deliberately destroying the helpless and the innocent, while turning a slightly more lenient eye on mistakenly killing in pursuit of justice.
 
Last edited:
Atreus21 said:
while turning a slightly more lenient eye on mistakenly killing in pursuit of justice.
Click to expand...

I doubt that. But, I will know when I meet Him.

Until then, I leave the issue of abortions up to the people who have the proper say and right to decide what they want to do with their bodies - women.

No apologies what so ever, it's the law, women decide. Make the move to reverse the law, if you like. But, you can not stop a woman from deciding what she wants to do with her body.

So, place your efforts on opening up support centers for pregnant women to avoid abortions. Or, since you value life so much, seek out to save those "mistakenly" killed in the pursuit of justice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top