- Apr 14, 2001
- 57,493
- 20,068
- 146
Originally posted by: Eli
Did you even read what I said? Apparently not. Look, I agree that this is lame. I was just throwing ideas out there.Originally posted by: Amused
Yeah, a 4' kid will be so much better off in 5' of water vs 10', right?Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Cyberian
Like an 8-year-old couldn't drown in a 5' pool?Swimming at an all-shallow pool with her 8-year-old daughter on a sweltering day in Philadelphia, Maria Rinaldi said of the new design: ``I think it's safer.
That's what I was thinking.
I wouldn't doubt that it would reduce drownings at least a little though. If the kid starts having problems, and he's in the (Oh noes!) deep end, he could panic and make the situation worse...![]()
Please read, and think about my comment again.
I did. I keep coming away from it with the idea that you think deep ends are more dangerous than 5" shallow ends. Is it a mistake in the inference, or implication? I dunno.
Sorry if that's not what you meant.
